IN THE BOMBAY
LEGISLATURE
______________________________________________
Contents
APPENDICES
I Speech by P. J. Roham on Birth-Control on behalf of Dr. Ambedkar
II Questions asked by Dr.
Ambedkar and Replies given by the Government
III Questionnaire of
University Reforms Committee and Written Evidence by Dr. Ambedkar.
APPENDIX I
*[f1]ON
MEASURES FOR BIRTH- CONTROL
Mr. P. J.
Roham (Ahmednagar South): Sir, I beg to move
" This Assembly recommends to Government
that in view of the urgent need of limiting the family units. Government should carry on
an intensive propaganda in favour of birth-control among the masses of this Province and
should provide adequate facilities for the practice of birth-control." Question
proposed.
Mr. P. J.
Roham (Addressed the House in Marathi): The educated class has, by this time, fully
realised the necessity of birth-control and fortunately the leaders in our country also
are unanimous on this point. Pandit Jawaharlal Nehru, Sir Ravindranath Tagore and Mrs. Sarojini Naidu, know very well
the importance and the urgency of the movement for birth-control and are in favour of
contraceptives. Babu Subhash Chandra Bose, the President of the Indian National Congress,
said in his presidential speech :
" If the population goes up by leaps and
bounds, as it has done in the recent past, our plans are likely to fall through."
Even Mahatma Gandhi has written long ago as follows :
" I must not conceal from the reader the
sorrow I feel when I hear of births in this land."
Very few have an adequate idea of the immense
loss sustained by children born of persons who are handicapped either physically, mentally
or financially. The parents as well as the society also suffer very much. The prevention
of the births of such children would considerably reduce the death-rate among mothers who
succumb to child-birth and its concomitant diseases, lower infantile mortality, improve
public health by removing the many diseases due to want of even the prime necessaries of
life felt by many persons, check the offences perpetrated by persons suffering from
intense poverty and would bring about an all-round uplift of society by affording full
scope to its spiritual advancement.
The present keen struggle of life renders
timely marriage impossible for many and thus exposes them to various diseases and habits.
Many women become invalid for life and some even lose their lives by the birth of children
in their diseased condition or in too great numbers or in too rapid succession. Attempts
at abortion, resorted to for the prevention of unwanted progeny, exact a heavy toll of
female lives. Unwanted children are often neglected by their mothers and hence they become
nothing but a burden to society which is further deteriorated by the addition of defective
progeny from diseased persons. Birth-control is the only sovereign specific that can do
away with all these calamities. Whenever a woman is disinclined to bear a child for any
reason whatsoever, she must be in a position to prevent conception and bringing forth
progeny which should be entirely dependent on the choice of women. Society would in no way
profit by the addition of unwanted progeny. Only those children who are welcomed by their
parents, can be of social benefit and hence every woman must be enabled to resort to
prevention of conception quite easily.
Poverty is the root-cause of immorality. The
following passage from the essay read by Prof. Dr. Tondler before the Congress at Vienna
in 1933 would show the evil consequences of insufficiency of living accommodation. The
professor said, " On the average every family gets one room in Germany, two and a
half rooms in France and three rooms in England. Seventy-five thousand families had no
tenements of their own in Berlin in 1925. The result is that children sleep with the
adults not only in the same room but also in the same bed. Many children lose their lives
by the overcrowding in sanitary dwellings. Whole families are stricken with veneral
diseases. Girls have to succumb to sexual intercourse even before they are mature. Sexual
connections often take place between parents and their children and brothers and sisters.
The boys learn to commit thefts and the girls become prostitutes. The same condition
prevails at Vienna. In 1919, out of the tenements let out, 10 per cent. had only one small
room; 37 per cent. had one big room and 23 per cent. had one small room and one big room.
Out of the children between the ages of fourteen and eighteen who maintained themselves,
twenty per cent. had no separate beds of their own. Towns and villages fare even
worse."
In our country, the same condition prevails
in cities like Bombay. A few exceptions apart, it is observed that virtue is palsied where
poverty prevails. Further on it will be shown how it is well-nigh impossible to uproot
poverty without the aid of birth-control. The aphorism, bubhukshitah kim na karoti papam, is well known.
When we have thus realised that birth-control
is the sine qua-non for every progress, we
must consider the means to attain that end. To be satisfied with only that much of sexual
enjoyment that is necessary for getting the desired number of children and to banish
sexual thoughts from one's mind when progeny is not required, is one of the ways. The use
of modern contraceptives is the other way. As for the first way, it must be remembered
that while continence in the unmarried state may be possible, it is nothing but displaying
ignorance about human nature to expect that young and healthy married couples, living
together and fond of each other, can observe continence for years together. The cases of
strong-willed persons, whose minds are not affected in the presence of objects of
enjoyment, apart, there is no doubt that ordinary human beings are bound to fall a prey to
the influence of enticements. Is it not strange, therefore, that this fact, which is as clear as daylight, is denied by some.
Self-control has been proved to be absolutely
useless for birth-control from the experience of several countries and ages. Even the
advocates of continence cannot claim that ordinary persons will be able to eschew sexual
intercourse altogether throughout their lives. The laying
aside of continence even for a single day every year may lead to an annual conception.
Even, if we assume that self-control enables certain persons to bring about birth-control,
we cannot draw the conclusion that others will be able to follow them. It is necessary to
remember that just as appetite for food differs in the case of different persons, so
sexual appetite also varies from person to person.
Strict observance of certain rules laid down
in Hindu scriptures necessitates the neglect of the ideal of family-limitation. For
instance, verse 5, Chapter 54, of " Vishnu Smriti " enjoins sexual intercourse
on certain specified days.
Sir, honourable members have received a
pamphlet written by Mrs. Sarojini Mehta, M.A., I am not going to read the whole pamphlet,
but will quote only a few passages from it:
" Whenever the subject of birth-control
is broached, the burden of our opponents' song is that continence (Brahmacharya) is the
sovereign specific for our country and that it is better to leave Westerners to be blessed
by their own artificial remedies. I humbly supplicate these honourable persons to state
the grounds upon which they hold this view. It is stated that our people are
spiritualistic, while Westerners are materialistic. It has now become well-nigh nauseating
to hear this parrot cry repeated. In what way are our people spiritualistic ? Have our
people renounced the world and become ascetics ? Can mere repetition of certain
catch-phrases like "All this is delusion." " One must abandon attachment to
worldly life ", turn people into spiritualistic ? Does not every one of our villages
possess Shylocks ready to demand their pound of flesh from poor and innocent debtors ? Are
there not bankers mean enough to devour the deposits of widows? Have we not scoundrels who
are debased enough to leave stranded helpless widows whom they themselves have misled ? Can we claim that our society is without men who have
discarded their chaste and devoted wives and taken to prostitutes ? I am completely at a
loss to understand how a society can be called spiritualistic, in which many are ruined by
matrimonial transactions that amount to virtual sales of brides and bridegrooms, in which
a person refusing to give an absenquial feast to his caste-people is out-casted, in which
men are planning their second marriages while their first wives are burning on funeral
pyres, in which even old fogies of sixty years can marry girls of twelve on the strength
of monetary bribes and in which the treatment offered to widows is worse than that given
even to the beasts. Western materialism cannot be held responsible for the rotten state of
our society described above. On the contrary it is those who have come into contact with
western materialism who are trying their best to remedy these evils, though their efforts
are proving nothing but a cry in the wilderness."
Further on, in another paragraph, she says :
" The conduct of Indraraj towards
Ahilya, of Parashar Rishi towards Satyawati and of Suryadev towards Kunti would make those
perpetrators liable for rigorous imprisonment in this age of Kali but that being
considered to be Satya Yug, we
not only connive at these delinquencies but raise books containing such descriptions to
the status of ' Sacred Books ' and insist that they must be
prescribed as test-books in the curriculum for children. How many lessons on continence
can pupils find in the Mahabharat, the Bhagwat and the Puranas ? How can an age, that
never knew what continence was, inspire us to observe that virtue ? How is it possible to
consider that age to have observed continence in which there were incidents like the story
of King Dushyanta, who first misled an innocent and guileless girl living in the hermitage
of a sage and then discarded her when she was pregnant ?
When one considers the number of children born to certain persons mentioned in very
ancient narratives, a doubt naturally arises in one's mind as to whether the people in
those days ever dreamt what continence was. How can one believe that continence was
observed in those times when one considers that Sagar begot
sixty thousand sons and that there were a hundred Kowrawas,
twenty-seven daughters of Daksha Prajapati and several other
such instances ? Continence was paid scant respect in bygone
days. It can actually be seen that in these days it is kept at a distance everywhere. The
birth-rate of our country is not falling lower than that of any ' materialistic ' country.
Brahmacharya cannot be observed even where the life of a woman, already the mother of many
children, is jeopardised by an additional delivery. It is neglected even in the families
of paupers, dying of hunger, where the addition of even a single individual to the family
would be nothing short of a calamity. Even in these days of unemployment, when if is
practically impossible to find outlets for sons, additional children are born even in
middle class families every year or year and a half. In castes, in which the usage of
dowry prevails, parents express much grief at the birth of a daughter, kill her at the
very outset or bring her up most negligently so that she may die a natural death. They,
however, never resort to continence to avoid the chances of girls being born. In spite of
all these instances we go on proclaiming that continence alone is the ideal for our
country! Of what earthly use is such conduct ? We have to take into account the state of
things actually existing before our eyes. There are no chances of making any improvement
in our condition by mere talk of ideals."
Dr. K.
B. Antrolikar: Sir, all that may be taken as read, because every member
has received it.
Mr. P. J. Roham: Sir, I have made it
clear that I am not going to read the whole of it. I request my honourable friend Dr.
Antrolikar to have patience.
Mr. P. J.
Roham: She continues :
" If, therefore, they have got the
country's welfare at heart, they ought to try their level best to popularise continence by
founding associations for the purpose of carrying on the work systematically, just as the
birth-controllers are doing to popularise contraceptives. If, however, they are either
unwilling or unable to do anything in this matter, the hands of the champions of
contraception will be strengthened."
As a doctor has wisely remarked, if men had
to bear the pangs which women have to undergo during child-birth none of them would ever
consent to bear more than a single child in his life.
It is wrong to hold that because the ideal of
large families is before society up to this time nobody wishes to limit his family. Human
beings, who earnestly desire to be saddled with large families, are rare. Ordinary persons
do want to limit their families and do not even flinch to have recourse to diabolical
methods such as abortion, infanticide, etc. Such attempts are witnessed everywhere. From
an account published by " The People's Tribune " in 1934 it is found that in
1933 over 24,000 dead bodies of little infants were picked up in the street of Shanghai
alone and the same state prevails throughout most of China. It is bitter and terrible
poverty that makes the parents expose their infants. In the light of such instances, it is
futile to hope that ordinary persons will be able to avoid progeny merely through
self-control. It is, therefore, established that there is no go without recourse to modern
contraceptives. To deny the necessity of those remedies is to show one's preference for
abortions, infanticides, etc.
Some people think that they would be losers
if the numbers in their particular race, religion, or region are lessened. They are afraid
that their adversaries would thereby be enabled to gain ground over them. In the first
place, it is necessary to remember in this connection that the rate of increase of a
population does not necessarily dwindle down as soon as family limitation is resorted to.
That rate is dependent not merely on the birth-rate but chiefly on the survival-rate. The
experience of several scientists from different places has proved that the higher the
birth-rate, the higher is the death-rate also and no sooner the birth goes down, the
death-rate also declines. The result is that not only is the survival-rate not adversely
affected but very often it even rises. Dr. Maria Stopes has found from the experience
gained in " The Mothers' Clinic " that the greater the number of conceptions the
higher is the rate of maternal and infantile mortality. Similar is the experience of other
scientists. Dr. J. M. Munro, M.D., F.R.F.P.S., says in his book " Maternal Mortality
and Morbidity ":
" The strongest argument in favour of
limiting the family is that by the fourth birth the mortality-rate very nearly approaches
that of the first birth, looked upon generally as the most serious and dangerous. After
the fourth birth, the mortality rate steadily and markedly rises with each successive
pregnancy and parturition. The same applies to still-births and neo-natal deaths."
Due to excessive child-mortality, the rate of
growth of the population of countries like India is not equal to that of countries like
England though the birth-rates in countries of the former type are higher than those in
the latter type. The birth-rate of England is nearly half that of India. Yet we find that
the population in England increased by nearly 23 per cent. between 1901 and 1931, while
the population in India rose by only 17 per cent. in the same period. This will show that
even for a rapid growth of numbers, the better way is to adopt the practice of
birth-control and thus cut down infantile mortality.
It must also be remembered that for modem
wars comparatively few persons are necessary. An army, well equipped with modern materials
for warfare, can route an army much greater in number than itself, if the latter one is not so well-equipped. In the former world war,
countries of low birth-rates vanquished those with high birth-rates.
In the world, we can witness many societies
that are small in numbers but distinguished in respect of wealth, culture etc. In our
country, the Parsee community is an illustration on this
point. To hanker after quantity is, therefore, not a very profitable ideal. The aphorism, varameko guniputro na ch murkhashatanyapi , is well
known.
After this, it is worth while keeping in mind
that it is principally poverty that is at the root of the animosity between different
races, societies and countries. When poverty will be uprooted, the root-cause of much of
such hatred will be eradicated and then nobody need be afraid of molestation from others.
The example of Western nations shows us that
modern contraception is utilised by persons of all races, religions and strata. For
instance, it is found that the notion that the Roman Catholics are against birth-control
is unfounded. France is a Roman Catholic country and still it is notorious that the
birth-rate in that country is quite low. The following ten countries had the lowest
birth-rates in 1932 :
Sweden
...
... ...
14-5
Germany
... ... ...
15-1
Austria
...
...
... 15-2
England and Wales ... ... ..15-3
Norway
...
...
...
16-3
Australia
...
...
...
16-4
Switzerland
...
...
... 16-7
New Zealand
...
...
... 17-1
United States
...
... ... 17-3
France
...
...
... 17-3
Among the three lowest countries are Austria, which is entirely Catholic, and Germany, which is one-third
Catholic.
The following figures, the birth-rates of
important cities, illustrate the very point. They are all for 1927 or 1928:
London
...
...
... 16-1
Cologne
...
...
... 16-0
Geneva
...
...
... 14-6
Milan
...
...
... 14-5
Turin
...
...
... 13-2
Prague
...
...
... 12-5
Munich
...
...
... 12-0
Vienna
...
...
... 10-6
With the exception of London, all the above
towns are solidly Roman Catholic, yet they all have a lower birth-rate than London. Three
of them are in Mussolini's Italy.
It will be thus seen that the fear, that
other communities will neglect birth-control and will thus become stronger in numbers, is
altogether a baseless one.
Speeches of statesmen, who are responsible
for wars, clearly show that economic difficulties, due to pressure of population, are at
the root of most of the modern wars, Bemhardt, the Kaiser, Hitler, Mussolini and Gooring
have often stressed this point in no ambiguous words. For instance, Adolf Hitler says in
his book, Mein Kampf :
" Through the mad multiplication of the
German people before the war, the question of providing the necessary daily bread came in
an ever sharper manner into the foreground of all political and economic thought and
action." Further on he says :
" Only an adequate amount of room upon
this earth secures to a nation the freedom of its existenceThe National Socialist
movement must endeavour to do away with the disproportion between our numbers and our
territory ............ Ground and territory must be the object of our foreign
politics." (pp. 728-35).
In his recent historic speech, delivered on
the 12th of September 1938, Hitler says:
"They expect Germany, where 140 persons
are squeezed into a square kilometre, to keep her Jews, whereas the powers with only a few
persons per kilometre do not want them ........."
Similarly Mussolini has said :
" We are hungry for land, because we are
prolific and intend to remain so." (From " Foreign Affairs ", October
1926).
" Italy demands that her indisputable
need of sun and land shall be recognised by all other nations. Should they fail to do so.
Italy will be forced to take matters into her own hand." (From " Sunday Times
", November 14, 1926).
The
Deputy Speaker: The honourable member has exceeded the
time-limit.
Mr. B. K. Gaikwad: Sir, may I
know what is the time-limit ?
The
Deputy Speaker : Half-an-hour.
Mr. B. K.
Gaikwad: On a point of information. Sir. The honourable member who moved the last
resolution (Mr. Shrikant) spoke, I believe, for more than an hour.
The
Deputy Speaker: Extension of the time is within the discretion of the Chair.
Mr. B. K.
Gaikwad: Can that indulgence not be given to other resolutions ?
Mr. P. J.
Roham: Sir, I do not wish to take much time of the House, but I have still some more
points to make and request you to kindly allow me some more minutes.
It is, therefore, obvious that all those who
stand for permanent world-brotherhood, must discountenance every attempt at increase of
numbers and must try their best to limit populations by means of birth-control.
The fear that birth-control propaganda will
fail to filter down to the masses and the result of the movement will thus be dysgenic
instead of eugenic, is also groundless. The experience gained in Western countries
establishes the fact that the lower classes do take advantage of contraceptives as soon as
they are made cognisant of them, the need being greater in their cases. The masses in our
country, though illiterate, are intelligent enough to know in what their own interest lies
and hence there is no doubt that they will fully utilise this invention also as soon as
they are made aware of its existence. Vasectomy would be found to be useful in the case of
such persons and hence Government and municipalities must provide facilities in this
respect in their hospitals, etc.
The late principal Gole has clearly shown in
his book that even villagers have many virtues and it is really they that replenish the
supply of good citizens.
The opponents of this movement try to show
its futility by pointing out the examples of France, Germany and Italy but they forget
that we cannot follow these countries unless it is proved that their attempts at the
increase of their populations are justified. In the first place, it must be kept in mind
that the birth-rates of these nations are much lower than the birth-rate of our country.
Our birth-rate is 35 whereas in 1936 the birth-rates of Italy, France and Germany were 22-2, 15 and 19 respectively. In 1900 the birth-rate in Germany
was 35-6 but in 1933 it came down to 14-7. Italy and France also have their birth-rates much reduced
since that time. In England the birth-rate was 33-9 in 1851-55 but in 1931 it was lowered
to 15-3. Our birth-rate is practically stationary for the
last fifty years and hence it would be unwise for us to imitate the efforts of other
countries towards raising that rate.
It is quite natural for imperialists to
lament the slackening of the rate of increase of the people of their race and it is not
surprising that they should raise cries like " Renew or Die ". It is, however,
strange to see that those cries should make even some educated persons suspicious about
the benefits of birth-control. An article, " Renew or Die ", by Sir Leo Chiozza
Money in " The Nineteenth Century and After " for February 1938 will illustrate
the point. This writer has assumed that white leadership is necessary for the good of all
humanity and has raised a cry to arrest the decline in the number of the white people.
Now, in the first place, many will refuse to admit that white supremacy has benefitted the
world and secondly few educated persons will be prepared to go to the length of
maintaining that the decline in the number of white people will bring down any calamity
upon humanity. Besides this, the postulates of this person are all wrong. He has taken it
for granted that the birth-rate in England will gradually become lower and lower and that
in the year 2,035 the population of England will be reduced to 4,400,000 (44 lacs). But
the facts are that the birth-rate in England is increasing instead of going down. In 1933
it was 14-4 but in July 1938 it becomes 15-3. Similarly whereas the writer has estimated
that the population of England and Wales in 1940 would be only 40,700,000, the actual
figure for 1937 there was already 41,031,000 and it is increasing at the rate of 190,000
people per year. These facts will show that one must take the precaution of not being
misled by such articles.
Emigration is sometimes suggested as a remedy
for finding an outlet to over-population but that remedy also is not very promising.
Compulsion in emigration, amounting to transportation is out of question. Very few persons
have the courage and the inclination necessary for leaving one's own country, endeared to
one's heart by reminiscences of childhood and the presence of relatives and friends and
made agreeable by a suitable climate and other factors and to repair to a distant land in
which there is the danger of the climate being found to' be an unsuitable one and in which
the inhabitants are different from oneself in language, customs and manners. Generally,
people willing to emigrate are those who are fit to be good citizens and who are able and
energetic. It is really a loss to the motherland that such people should emigrate. These
persons can easily maintain themselves in their own country but ambition impels them to
try to better their lot by going to distant lands. Emigration is practically useless in
the case of persons who are handicapped either physically or mentally or financially and it is really these people that
stand in need of help. Considered from the point of the necessary capital alone, this
remedy cannot afford relief to many persons.
Besides this, it must be kept in mind that
sparsely populated countries are unwilling to accommodate others because they require
elbow-room for their own increasing progeny. Canada is a colony in the British Empire
mainly inhabited by Englishmen but it is notorious that the Canadians refused to allow
English labourers, who had gone there for seasonal work, to settle in their land. Wars are
occasioned by the attempts of populous countries to force their entrance in sparse
regions. An illustration on the point, which is quite recent and near to us, is afforded
by Burma. The cause underlying the recent communal riots there was mainly the suspicion in
the minds of the Burmans that Indian marred their material progress. Compared: to
over-populated countries, regions of sparse populations are very few, Japan, Italy,
Germany, China, India and many other countries are over-populated. It is not possible to
find adequate room for emigrants from all these lands..
One more point in this connection is also
worth mentioning. Emigration cannot solve the population problem of a country permanently.
Like air, expanding population has a tendency to fill up vacuum immediately, leading to
the recurrence of the former condition and hence it is obvious that there is no go without
birth-control.
Some think that as soon as child-marriages
are given up and late marriages are introduced, the increase in population will be
checked. But this belief also is an unfounded one. In the first place, years must elapse
before the ages at which girls are married would be sufficiently raised in our country.
The years of greatest fertility in the case of girls are those between 18 and 22. In
Western countries, women marry after this period. That is, they marry when their time of
greatest fertility is over. When we notice the difficulties in the enforcement of the
Sarda Act, fixing the minimum age of marriage of a girl at 14, we can easily see that it
is almost useless to hope that in the near future women in our country will postpone their
marriages up to 22 and population will be checked thereby. Mr. P. K. Wattal has drawn the following conclusions from the fertility-enquiry
conducted specially in connection with the 1931 census.
(1) That girls married at ages below twenty
give birth to a smaller number of children than girls married at ages above twenty.
(2) That the survival-rate of children born to mothers married at ages below twenty is much less than
that of children born to mothers married at ages above
twenty.
These conclusions show us that even when late
marriages would come into vague generally, there is no chance of population being
appreciably checked thereby. More children would live upto mature ages and hence there is
a chance of an increase and not a decrease in the rate of growth of our population.
Dr. G. S. Ghurye, Ph.D., University Professor
of Sociology, Bombay, says in his article, " Fertility Data of the Indian Census of
1931 "in the" Journal of the University of Bombay" (Vol. Ill, May 1934)
:-
" If the above tentative conclusion
about the co-relation between fertility and the age of woman at marriage should prove to
be correct, then with the increase in woman's age at marriage which is quite essential,
there would be an increase in the fertility of marriage. As it is, I believe our
population is very large and our increase undesirable and to help its increase at a
greater rate would be suicidal. With our efforts to raise the women's age at marriage,
therefore, there must also be carried on an intensive campaign for control of birth."
It must not, moreover, be forgotten that
prostitution is encouraged by people being unable to marry at proper ages and other evil
consequences also follow thereby. It is, therefore, necessary to resort to birth-control
if marriage at a proper age is aimed at.
The view is held that economic independence
of women will lessen the growth of population but it also does not hold water. Economic
independence has no power to free a person from the clutches of Eros. Few women can
observe perfect continence throughout their lives and hence this remedy would be found to
be fruitless. Even now, women of the lower classes are actually helping their families
with their own earnings but that fact does not seem to help family-limitation to any
extent.
Some persons hold the view that though
birth-control may be necessarily on medical and hygienic grounds, still it is not required
for solving economic difficulties. They maintain that our country has got much scope for
economic and agricultural development and efforts in these directions would raise the
standard of life of our people appreciably. On close examination, however, this view also
is found to be quite untenable. Want of sufficient capital and rich customers would
prevent any material development of our industries. Similarly, insufficiency of fertile
lands, rain-fall and manures stand in the way of any substantial increase in our
agricultural production. Except in Assam, there is very little fertile land that has not
yet been brought under cultivation. In Burma, there is even now sufficient suitable land
awaiting cultivation and it was the figure of such land from that province that misled
certain people into the belief that India has even yet sufficient fertile virgin land. In
our province, 86-4 per cent. of the cultivable land has already been brought under the
plough and it is doubtful whether even a fraction of the rest of the land is of any value.
According to the Report of the Royal Commission on Indian Agriculture much of such land is
worthless. A great portion of the agricultural land in our country has become barren
through incessant cropping and want of sufficient manures.
Through the excessive growth of population,
our country suffers from deficiency of forests and pasture-lands. In Canada 34-3 per cent.
of cultivable land is reserved for pasturage. This proportion is 21.5 in France. 18.3 in
Italy, 14.3 in Germany but in our country it is only 1.6. These figures will show to what
strait our cattle is forced. Cast our glance in whatever direction we may come across mere
skeletons of cattle. Though our people pride themselves upon their humanitarianism, they
have, in their struggle for land, unjustly deprived the dumb creatures of much of their
pasturage and brought it under tillage. Our agriculture, therefore, is suffering from
insufficiency of useful cattle and organic manures like cow-dung, and hence it is very
difficult to effect many appreciable improvements in it. Some persons point out the large
produce per acre of rice in Japan and China and hold out the hope that there is scope for
materially increasing our produce of that crop. There are grounds, however, to doubt the
correctness of the figures of the production of rice in those countries. Count Karlo
Sforra, former Minister for Foreign Affairs for Italy, contributed an article styled
" The conflict between China and Japan " to a recent number of the "
International Conciliation," a monthly published from New York. It is stated therein
that from 1900, there is an appreciable decrease in the rice production per acre in Japan.
There is considerable evidence to show that figures about agriculture in Japan are not
reliable. Besides this, notice also must be taken of the facts that Japan is blessed with
plenty of timely and all-the-year round rainfall and abundance of manures due to her
extensive forests and also with a climate ideally suited to her rice crops; combination of
advantages rarely witnessed anywhere else. Although it may be admitted that self-rule may
effect some betterment of the lot of our masses, no lasting and appreciable improvement in
the economic condition of our people can be hoped for unless the growth of our population
is deliberately checked. As has been already explained, with every opportunity afforded
for its expansion, population begins to grow rapidly and thus nullifies all the advantages
secured through great efforts. Hence, experience has made many scientists to hold the view
that unless precaution is taken to regulate population growth by means of birth-control
along with efforts to improve the economic condition of the people there cannot be any
substantial and permanent rise in the standard of life of the masses.
The fact, that mere self-rule is powerless to
effect an all-round improvement in the condition of a people, is demonstrated to the hilt
by the examples of many independent nations. Although, through various reasons, including
a low birth-rate, the economic condition of the inhabitants of countries like England and
America is superior to that obtaining in this countrypoverty prevents many of our
countrymen from obtaining a nourishing food-still it is far from satisfactory. Even
there, many find it difficult to maintain a standard of life necessary for perfect health.
According to President Roosevelt one-third of the
inhabitants of America do not get sufficient nourishing food. One of the reasons for this
is that even there birth-control is not practised to the
extent to which it is necessary. There is plenty of fertile land per head in countries
that are newly settled and hence the people there get more
nourishing food than that obtained by persons in thickly populated nations. Here are the
figures of consumption per head per annum in Australia and Italy :
|
Australia |
Italy |
Milk and its products (gals.) |
102 |
23 |
Meat (Ibs.) |
202 |
35 |
Fruit (Ibs.) |
104 |
40 |
Sugar (Ibs.) |
107 |
18 |
Wheat (Ibs.) |
297 |
351 |
Every article of food except wheat is consumed
in far greater quantities in Australia than in Italy.
Out of the nations of the old world,
countries like Holland that have their birth-rates much reduced through birth-control, are
much happier than the rest.
In the Bombay Presidency, the amount of milk
available per head per day is only one and a quarter "
tolas ". According to authorities on nutrition, every individual must get on an
average at least one pint of milk per day.
The main object of the movement for
birth-control is to bring about a state of things wherein every country will have its
birth-rate suitably reduced so that it would thus be able to maintain its population
decently with the aid of its own produce.
Some are under the impression that modern
scientific discoveries have solved the problems of food for mankind and that it is only
mal-distribution that is at the root of the present economic difficulties. Fair
distribution of property would, in their opinion, bring about plenty everywhere. There is
no doubt that in many places injustice prevails in the division of property and every
impartial public worker must take all steps to secure justice for wronged persons in this
respect. It is, however, necessary to remember that mere equal distribution will never be
able to bring about a permanent and material amelioration of the condition of the masses
unless growth of population is controlled by means of family-limitation.
Land being the chief source of all wealth,
there cannot be plenty for all unless plenty of fertile land falls to the share of each
individual. Agricultural experts like Sir Damiel Hall and Prof. East have pointed out that
about two and a half acres of cultivable land are needed to support one individual on the
western European standard. But in all old countries, people have to maintain themselves on
land much less than this. In India, there is only three quarters of an acre of cultivable
land for each individual and, as has been already pointed out, according to the opinion of
the Royal Commission on Agriculture, much of the uncultivated land in this country is
practically useless.
The view that the advent of chemical fertilisers has solved the problem of manures is also not a sound one. Artificial manures cannot be used at each and every place. Rao Bahadur D. L. Sahastrabudhe, M.Ag., M.Sc., retired Agricultural Chemist to the Government of Bombay, wrote in his article in " Sahyadri " for October 1936 as follows :
"Experience has shown that artificial manures cannot be utilised everywhere. Organic manures like cow-dung must accompany the use of chemical fertilisers. Otherwise, artificial manures do not prove to be congenial to the crops. Similarly the crop that is to be manured with chemical fertilisers must have plentiful supply of water to prevent an injury to it.
Besides this, it must be noted that the two
chief fertilisers are nitrates and phosphates and neither is of much use without the
other. The supply of phosphates, however, is very limited. Sir Federick Keeble says :
'Nearly all the soil of the world are
famishing for phosphates.' (Fertilisers and Food Production) (1932), p. 221. Professor
Armstrong says:
'The solution of the nitrogen problem by
Crookes has brought us nearer to destruction rather than saved us, by hastening the
depletion of irreplaceable phosphatic stores.'."
Almost all places are suffering from
inadequacy of forests and as a result thereof there is also a shortage of water and
manures.
The present Congress Government are trying to
uplift the masses of this Bombay Presidency (hear, hear). But all their efforts will go in
vain if the population-problem is not tackled by means of birth-control.
The
Deputy Speaker: The Honourable Member may now bring his remarks to a close.
Mr. P. J.
Roham: Yes, Sir. Dr. Radhakamal Mukerjee has in his
book, " Food Planning for 400 Millions ", states :
" Unless some check is placed upon
population-growth, any other remedy tends to be only temporary, as in the latter country
(China), for population will rapidly rise again to the maximum number of persons the land
will support. As population outruns faster the educational facilities that may be
provided, while the taxable capacity hardly increases, it is clear that the pressure of
population cannot be viewed merely in relation to the food-supply. An expanding population
makes readjustments more and more difficult. A rational family planning and education of
the masses in birth-control, must be accepted as the most effective means of combating
population-increase."
Bombay is the gateway of India and this
movement also entered this country through that very gate. It would be in the fitness of
things, therefore, that it should also be nurtured in this very province. Few people get
an opportunity for doing acts that would immortalise their names. Birth-control movement
has afforded such an opportunity to our provincial government and it is hoped that they
will not let it slip but will fully utilise it to the benefit of themselves and the
people.
QUESTIONS ASKED BY Dr. B. R. AMBEDKAR AND REPLIES
GIVEN BY THE GOVERNMENT
Government
Service: Selection Board
Dr. B. R.
Ambedkar : Will Government be pleased to state (a) whether there is any selection board
constituted for the purpose of selecting candidates applying for the vacancies in the
Provincial and Subordinate Services of the Government of Bombay; (b) if so, the names of the members who constitute
that Board ?
The
Honourable Sir Chunilal Mehta: No single Board exists for selecting candidates for the
Provincial and Subordinate Services of the Government of Bombay. For certain of the
Provincial Services selection committees have been constituted. Appointments to the
Subordinate Services are made by the heads of offices under powers delegated to them or by
the Local Government.
Dr. B. R.
Ambedkar: Will the Honourable Member state whether he can give the names of the
members of the Committees constituted for the Provincial Services ? He says that for
certain of the Provincial Services selection committees have been formed.
The
Honourable Sir Chunilal Mehta: I am afraid I cannot carry the names of the members in
my head. If the honourable member gives notice, I shall supply the names. But I think
there is not a fixed list of members of these committees; they change, I believe, every
year or from time to time. (B.L.C. Debates, Vol. XIX, p. 325, dated 28th February 1927)
Acquisition
and Improvement of Land for Village Sites
Dr. B. R.
Ambedkar: Sir, I rise to a point of information. I do not exactly understand the
object for which this amount is provided in the present budget. I should like to know from
the Honourable Member in-charge whether it is expended for the purposes of establishing
new settlements of villagers who are dissatisfied with their own village sites, or whether
the amount is spent for providing amenities to the villagers, or for what purpose. There
is certainly no information given either in the Blue Book or the White Book to enable new
members like myself understand the exact purpose of this amount. I, therefore, hope that
some enlightenment will be thrown on this subject. (B.L.C. Debates, Vol. XIX, p. 421,
dated 1st March 1927)
Superintendents
of Land Records
Dr. B. R.
Ambedkar: Sir, I do not think that much argument need be wasted on this motion. The
motion is based upon the ground that these superintendents who are provided in the budget
at a cost of Rs. 35,800 do work which ordinarily in the course of things can be done and
discharged by the deputy collectors. The only answer to this argument is that the deputy
collectors are not in a position to do this work. The reply given by the honourable
member, the Settlement Commissioner, does not seem to me to touch on that aspect of the
question. Nobody here in this House disputes that the work done by them is useful work
necessary in the interest of society, but, Sir, the point and the important point is
whether such work cannot be done by deputy collectors. If the reply to that is in the
affirmative, then Government has no case at all, and I should like Government to clear
that point in order to enable new members like me to decide one way or the other.
(B.L.C. Debates, Vol. XIX, p. 453, dated 3rd
March 1927)
Deputy Collectorship: Application of Mr. M. K. Jadhav
Dr. B. R.
Ambedkar : Will Government be pleased to state (i) Whether Mr. M. K. Jadhav,
B.A. (Hons.), Bombay, applied for one of the three posts of Deputy Collector recently
filled up by the Revenue Department of the Government of Bombay ?
(ii) Whether they were aware that he belonged
to the depressed classes ? (iii) The reasons why his application was rejected '?
Honourable
Mr. J. L. Rieu: (i) Yes. (ii) Yes.
(iii) Government regret that they are not
prepared to state the reasons why Mr. Jadhav or any other individual candidate was not
selected.
Dr. B. R.
Ambedkar: Did Government apply the rule of 50 per cent. reserved posts for depressed
classes in Government service when filling up the appointments ?
The
Honourable Mr. J. L. Rieu: The rule does not apply at all. It applies to clerical
staff only.
Mr. W. S.
Mukadam: Will Government be pleased to give us the names of the candidates selected ?
The
Honourable Mr. J. L. Rieu: The honourable member will find it from records.
Dr. B. R.
Ambedkar: Is the exclusion of Mr. Jadhav consistent with the policy of Government of
encouraging the depressed classes ?
The
Honourable Mr. J. L. Rieu: It is not inconsistent with it. (B.L.C. Debates, Vol. XIX,
p. 545, dated 5th March 1927)
Admission
of Depressed Classes to Public Places
Dr. B. R. Ambedkar: Will Government be pleased to state what
steps they have taken to carry into effect Mr. Bole's resolution to throw open to the
depressed classes all public places in this presidency ?
The
Honourable Sir Ghulam Hussain: Attention is invited to the Press Note No. P-117, dated
the 29th September 1923 (copy below for ready reference) issued by the Director of
Information.
Press
Note No. P-117, dated the 29th September 1923 (With the Compliments of the Director of
Information, Bombay)
THE UNTOUCHABLE
CLASSES
GOVERNMENT AND
COUNCIL RESOLUTIONS
At the last session of the Bombay Legislative
Council, on the motion of Mr. S. K. Bole, a resolution was passed recommending that
"the untouchable classes be allowed to use all public watering places, wells and
dharamshalas which are built and maintained out of public funds or are administered by
bodies appointed by Government or erected by Statutes as well as public schools, courts,
offices and dispensaries."
In pursuance of this resolution Government
have directed their officers to give effect to it as far as it relates to the public
places and institutions belonging to and maintained by Government. The Collectors have
been requested to advise the local public bodies to consider the desirability of accepting
the recommendation made in the resolution. The Bombay and Karachi Port Trusts, the Bombay
City Improvement Trust and the Municipal Corporation have also been requested lo give
effect to the resolution with regard to the places under their control.
Dr. B. R.
Ambedkar : Is the honourable member aware that the depressed classes in several places
are prevented from taking advantage of the public places provided by the public bodies, by
the ordinary villagers in the villages ?
The
Honourable Sir Ghulam Hussain: Not to my knowledge.
(B.L.C. Debates, Vol. XIX, p. 546, dated 5th
March 1927)
Assistant
Educational Inspector for Depressed Classes
Dr. B. R.
Ambedkar: Will Government be pleased to state (i) Why Mr. G. G. Kamble was
reduced from his post of Extra Assistant Educational Inspector for the Depressed Classes ?
(ii) Whether the said post has been abolished ? (iii) If so, why ?
The
Honourable Dewan Bahadur Harilal D. Desai: (i) Mr. Kamble was reverted because he
failed to justify his existence, there being no real improvement in the schools placed
under his charge. (ii) Yes.
(iii) The post was abolished because the
control of primary schools having been transferred to the local authorities under the
Bombay Primary Education Act, 1923, there was no longer any necessity for Government to
continue to maintain it.
Dr. B. R.
Ambedkar: Does not Government think it necessary that the benefit of a special
assistant educational inspector should be extended to the depressed classes schools ?
The
Honourable Dewan Bahadur Harilal D. Desai: In the first instance, Government created
the special post. The schools have now been transferred to the local bodies, and if
Government find it necessary to make such an appointment, they will consider the matter.
(B.L.C. Debates, Vol. XIX, p. 604, dated 7th March 1927)
Judgements
of Mr, Fleming, City Magistrate
Dr. B. R.
Ambedkur: Will Government be pleased to stale (a) whether their attention has been drawn to the
judgements delivered by Mr. Fleming, City Magistrate, Poona, in the two recent criminal
cases (i) Emperor v. Baburao Fule and (ii)
Emperor v. Javalkar and others in both of which
the accused were charged under section 500 of the Indian Penal Code;
(b)
whether they are aware that Mr. Fleming has delivered contradictory judgements on a common
point of law involved in both the cases, viz., whether the complainant is an aggrieved
person within the meaning of section 198 of the Criminal Procedure Code;
(c) whether they have called for an
explanation from Mr. Fleming as to why he delivered such contradictory judgements;
(d)
whether they propose to take any steps against Mr. Fleming in this connection?
The
Honourable Mr. J. E. B. Hotson: (a) to (d)
The remedies provided by the law are open to any person who considers himself aggrieved by
a magistrate's judgement. Government could not without gross impropriety express an
opinion in this House on the points to which this question refers.
Mr. S. K.
Bole: The answer is given only to (b) and
not to (a), (c) or(d).
The
Honourable Mr. J. E. B. Hotson: The answer is to all four parts of the question.
Mr. S. K.
Bole : The question in (a) is "
whether their attention is drawn to the judgements delivered by Mr. Fleming " but
there is no answer to that.
The
Honourable Mr. J. E. B. Hotson: I think, it is implied. The attention of Government
has been drawn to them.
Mr. S. K.
Bole: Again, in (b) the question is "
whether they are aware that Mr. Fleming has delivered contradictory judgements " but
there is no answer to that.
The
Honourable Mr. J. E. B. Hotson: Yes, the reply is there, " Government could not
without gross impropriety express an opinion in this House " etc.
Mr. S. K.
Bole: What is asked is whether they are aware.
The
Honourable the President: The word "contradictory" implies and asks for
opinion, and therefore that reply.
(B.L.C. Debates, Vol. XIX, p. 1147, dated
16th March 1927)
Assault
by Mulki Patil on a Mahar (Chikhardi)
Dr. B, R.
Ambedkar : Will Government be pleased to state (a) whether it is a fact that the Mulki Patil of
the village Chikhardi in the Sholapur District committed an assault on Arjuna Lala Mahar
for refusing to do his private work and fractured his skull;
(b)
whether it is a fact that Arjuna is now being treated for his injury at the Civil
Hospital, Barsi;
(c) if so, what steps they have taken against
the Patil ?
The
Honourable Mr. J. L. Rieu: The information has been called for.
(B.L.C. Debates, Vol. XIX, p. 1147, dated
16th March 1927)
Harassment
of Mahars (Sholapur)
Dr. B. R.
Ambedkar : Will Government be pleased to state (a) whether it is a fact that the Gaonkaris of the
villages of (i) Ralerass, (ii) Pangaon, (iii) Pangri, (iv) Uple Dumala, (v) Ambegaon and
(vi) Surdi in the District of Sholapur have been acting in conspiracy to stop the ryots
and shop-keepers of their respective villages from having any dealings with the Mahars of
their villages and have assaulted the Mahars of their villages and have in some cases
outraged the modesty of the Mahar women and have gone to the length of throwing filth in
the water-courses used by the Mahars because the Mahars in these villages have in their
efforts at self-improvement given up the carrying of the carcasses of dead animals ;
(b)
what steps they propose to take to protect the Mahars from such tyranny. The Honourable Mr. J. E. B. Hotson : The
information is being obtained.
(B.L.C. Debates, Vol. XIX, p. 1298, dated
17th March 1927)
Accident
on the Ulhas River
Dr. B. R.
Ambedkar : Will Government be pleased to state (a) whether their attention has been drawn to the
leading article published in the Pratiyogi,
dated the 13th February 1926, and the extracts of statements of the people of Badlapur
published in the Pratiyogi, dated the 12th
June 1926;
(b)
if so, whether they still withhold the permission to prosecute as asked for ?
The
Honourable Sir Cowasji Jehangir: (a) Government have noticed a summary of the article
published in the Pratiyogi, dated the 13th
February 1926, but not the extracts of statements of the people of Badlapur published in
the issue of the paper of 12th June 1926. (b)
Yes.
(B.L.C. Debates, Vol. XX, p. 759, dated 27th
July 1927)
Public
Service: Depressed Classes
Dr. B. R.
Ambedkar: Will Government be pleased to give the following information regarding the
strength of the depressed classes in the public service:
District |
Department |
Number of Depressed Classes employed |
|
As peons |
On the staff |
The
Honourable Sir Chunilal Mehta: The information has been called for. (B.L.C. Debates,
Vol. XX, p. 847, dated 27th July 1927)
Watandar
Mahars: Remuneration
Dr. B. R.
Ambedkar: Will Government be pleased to give the following information for each
village in the Presidency:
Village |
Total Population |
No. of Offending Mahars |
Remuneration to
officiating Mahars estimated from all sources in Rupees |
Total Remuneration |
|||
From Inam land |
From Baluta |
Government Salary |
|
||||
|
The
Honourable Mr. J. L. Rieu: As the time and trouble involved in obtaining the
information would be out of all proportions to its possible utility from the public point
of view. Government regret that they are not prepared to collect it. If the Honourable
Member will select a small number of typical villages for this enquiry. Government will
consider whether it is practicable to supply the information he desires in regard to them.
Dr. B. R.
Ambedkar: It is not a fact that the information asked for in this question is
obtainable from the watan proceedings of every village ?
The
Honourable Mr. J. L. Rieu : In any case I would call the honourable member's attention
to the fact that this question would have to be sent to every village in the Bombay
Presidency. The labour and time involved in collecting this information would be enormous.
(B.L.C. Debates, Vol. XX, p. 1065, dated 27th July 1927)
Officiating
Watandar Mahars
Dr. B. R.
Ambedkar : Will Government be pleased to state (a) whether there are any rules governing the
number of the officiating Watandar Mahars in the villages in the different parts of the
presidency ? (Jb) if so, whether they will
publish them or refer to them ?
The
Honourable Mr. J. L. Rieu: (a) and (b)
There are no rules on the subject. The appointment of officiating Watandar Mahars is
governed by the provisions of section 64 of the Bombay Hereditary Offices Act.
Dr. B. R.
Ambedkar: Is the Honourable Member aware that discretion is left to the Collector
under section 64 in exercise of which he can make rules regarding officiating Watandar
Mahars ?
The
Honourable Mr. J. L. Rieu: I am aware of that.
Dr. B. R.
Ambedkar: Is the honourable member aware that in a certain village 16 Mahars are
officiating as Watandars ?
The
Honourable Mr. J. L. Rieu: If the honourable member gives notice I will make
enquiries.
(B.L.C. Debates, Vol. XX, p. 1207, dated 27th
July 1927)
Bridge
on the Ulhas River at Badlapur
Dr. B. R.
Ambedkar : Will Government be pleased to state
(a)
whether the consideration of the question of constructing a low level causeway on the
river Ulhas at Badlapur in the Thana District has not yet been finished;
(b)
whether the whole correspondence including the Commissioner's and the Collector's reports
thereon would be placed on the Council Table ;
(c) whether they are aware that a high level
bridge instead of a low level causeway is absolutely necessary ?
The
Honourable Mr. J. L. Rieu: (a) No. But it is hoped that a conclusion will soon be
reached.
(b)
Government are not prepared to place the correspondence on the table.
(c) No.
(B.L.C. Debates, Vol. XX, p. 1472, dated 27th
July 1927)
Forest
Land for Cultivation: Grants to Depressed Classes
Dr. B. R.
Ambedkar: Will Government be pleased to state (a) the total extent of forest land given for
cultivation in each district of this Presidency in the years 1923, 1924, 1925 and 1926; (b) how much of this was given to the Depressed
Classes in each district in the years mentioned ?
Honourable Mr. G. B. Pradhan : (a and b) A
statement furnishing the required information is placed on the Council Table. The area
shown in the statement is for each forest division of the presidency.
Statement of forest land given out for
cultivation during 1923,1924,1925 and 1926
Forest Division |
Total extent of forest land
given out for cultivation |
|||
|
1923 |
1924 |
1925 |
1926 |
Northern Circle |
Acres |
Acres |
Acres |
Acres |
1 Panch Mahals |
660 |
7,536 |
|
9 |
2 Surat .. |
1,175 |
1,152 |
3,558 |
|
3 North Thana |
191 |
171 |
|
5 |
4 West Thana |
339 |
330 |
295 |
|
5 East Thana |
21,463 |
2,237 |
2,810 |
3,733 |
6 West Nasik |
3,080 |
432 |
1,817 |
256 |
7 East Nasik |
8,493 |
2,714 |
2,100 |
2,482 |
Central Circle |
|
|
|
|
1 East Khandesh . . |
186 |
401 |
1,756 |
1,872 |
2 North Khandesh .. |
|
1,325 |
1,660 |
1,815 |
3 West Khandesh .. |
90 |
51 |
235 |
560 |
4 Poona |
1 |
1 |
70 |
36 |
5 Ahmednagar |
4,254 |
55 |
86 |
88 |
6 Satara |
3,516 |
252 |
473 |
285 |
Southern Circle |
|
|
|
|
1 Northern Division, Kanara |
22 |
|
|
7 |
2 Eastern Division, Kanara |
105 |
137 |
33 |
7 |
3 Southern Division, Kanara |
26 |
40 |
31 |
37 |
4 Western Division, Kanara |
.133 |
70 |
59 |
5 |
5 Central Division, Kanara |
13 |
6 |
1 |
|
6 Belgaum |
668 |
719 |
2,006 |
2,717 |
7 Dharwar |
346 |
25 |
154 |
132 |
Sind Circle |
|
|
|
|
1 Sukkur |
1,841 |
2,577 |
1,330 |
1,888 |
2 Shikapur |
1,399 |
1,256 |
1,066 |
928 |
3 Larkana |
4,321 |
3,143 |
4,838 |
5,300 |
4 Hyderabad |
549 |
1,782 |
2,071 |
2,396 |
5 Karachi |
92 |
1,093 |
1,789 |
3,084 |
|
Northern Circle |
|
|
|||
1 |
Panch Mahals |
227 |
1,446 |
|
9 |
|
2 |
Surat |
1,175 |
1,152 |
3,558 |
|
|
3 |
North Thana |
191 |
171 |
|
5 |
|
4 |
West Thana |
339 |
330 |
295 |
|
|
5 |
East Thana |
21,463 |
2,237 |
2,810 |
3,733 |
|
6 |
West Nasik |
2,927 |
411 |
1,727 |
243 |
|
7 |
East Nasik |
8,493 |
2,714 |
2,100 |
2,482 |
|
|
Central Circle |
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
East Khandesh |
|
30 |
91 |
101 |
|
2 |
North Khandesh |
|
1,325 |
1,660 |
1,815 |
|
3 |
West Khandesh .. |
.. 40 |
37 |
90 |
340 |
|
4 |
Poona |
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
Ahmednagar |
55 |
|
|
|
|
6 |
Satara |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Southern Circle |
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
Northern Division, Kanara |
|
|
|
|
No applications were received from persons of Depressed Classes during these years. |
2 |
Eastern Division, Kanara |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
Southern Division, Kanara |
.. 20 |
38 |
28 |
36 |
|
4 |
Western Division, Kanara |
|
|
|
|
No applications were received from persons of Depressed Classes during these years |
5 |
Central Division, Kanara |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6 |
Belgaum |
.. 45 |
104 |
23 |
664 |
|
7 |
Dharwar |
|
|
|
|
Do. |
|
Sind Circle |
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
Sukkur |
|
|
|
|
There are no Depressed Classes in Sind who do agricultural work. |
2 |
|
|
|
|
||
3 |
|
|
|
|
||
4 |
Hyderabad |
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
Karachi |
|
|
|
|
(B.T..C. Debates. Vol. XX. pp. 1472-74, dated
27th July 1927)
Tobacco
Licence
Dr. B. R.
Ambedkar : Will Government be pleased to state (a) whether one Narayan Sakharam had applied to the
Superintendent of Excise, Tobacco Department, for licence to sell tobacco;
(b) whether his application was refused
although the applicant was a military pensioner and was recommended for licence by the
Officer Commanding the 117th Rajputs; (c) the reasons why his application was refused;
(d)
whether the application was refused on account of the fact that the applicant belonged to
the depressed classes;
(e) whether they make any caste
discrimination in the matter of issuing licences?
The
Honourable Mr. J. L. Rieu: (a) Yes. (b)
Yes.
(c) Tobacco licences are only granted to
persons in really indigent circumstances who are unable to earn a livelihood by any other
means. The person referred to by the honourable member was reported to be quite fit to
earn his livelihood in other ways. He was therefore refused a licence. (d) No. (c) No.
Dr. B. R.
Ambedkar: Is this in accordance with the rules laid down by the department in the
matter of tobacco licences ?
The
Honourable Mr. J. L. Rieu: I do not think that there are any specific rules on the
subject, but that is the practice.
Dr. B.
R. Ambedkar: May I know whether this particular question refers to the
honourable member's department or to the department under the Excise Minister ?
The
Honourable Mr. J. L. Rieu: This refers to the Revenue Department. Tobacco licences are
given out by the Collector of Bombay. (B.L.C. Debates, Vol. XXI, p. 57, dated 29th
September 1927) Forest Lands, Nasik: Applications of Mahars
Dr. B. R.
Ambedkar : Will Government be pleased to state (a) whether they are aware that the Mahars of the
village of Pimplad in taluka Nasik had applied to the Collector for forest land;
(b)
whether they had asked for survey number 220 in the village of Pimplad;
(c) whether, that being refused, they had
asked for survey number 202 in the village of Rajur-Babula ;
(d)
whether, that being refused they had asked for survey number 71 in the village of
Rajur-Babula;
(c) whether it is a fact that even this last
application has been rejected; (f) the reasons for this persistent refusal to consider
favourably the applications of these Mahars ?
The
Honourable Mr. G. B. Pradhan: (a), (b), (c), (d) and (e) Yes, as it had already been.
granted to another individual.
(2) Survey No. 202 of Rajur is pasture forest
incharge of the Revenue Department. It is sold annually for grazing to the villagers, and
it cannot be granted for any other purpose, as the remaining grazing area available in the
village is not sufficient for their requirements.
(3) For the same reason Survey No. 71 of
Rajur-Babula which is assigned for Kuran (grazing ground) could not be granted to the
Mahars.
I may add that II survey numbers of Pimplad and Rajur-Babula comprising of nearly 200 acres of land
were the only lands available for being given out for cultivation. They were therefore put
to sale at an upset price 12 times the assessment and it was ordered that none but the
Mahars, Bhils and Kolis should
bid. The condition was imposed specially to exclude unfair competition by moneyed people.
The papers of the sales recently sanctioned show that two Kolis and three Mahars of
Pimplad and one Koli and three Mahars of Rajur-Babula are the purchasers. (B.L.C. Debates,
Vol. XXI, p. 219, dated 1st October 1927)
Grazing Grounds, Thana District
Dr. P. G.
Solanki on behalf of Dr. B. R. Ambedkar: Will Government be pleased to state
(a) whether their attention has been drawn to
the information published on pages 372 and 417 of the Vividha Jnana Vistar of the year
1926;
(b)
if so, whether they intend to take steps to order such varkas or grass lands to be free
from assessment;
(c) whether they intend to let open the
forest lands of the village of Badlapur in the Thana District for agricultural and grazing
purposes as the income from those forest lands is comparatively very small ?
The
Honourable Mr. J. L. Rieu : (a) Only when the Honourable Member gave notice of this
question.
(b)
No.
(c) No.
(B.L.C. Debates, Vol. XXI, pp. 269-70, dated
1st October 1927)
Forest Lands for Depressed Classes
Dr. P. G.
Solanki on behalf of Dr. B. R. Ambedkar: Will Government be pleased to state
(a)
whether they are aware of the enormous extent of unemployment prevailing among the
depressed classes;
(b)
whether in view of the fact that many occupations are closed to the depressed classes
owing to the system of untouchability, they intend to consider the question of forming
settlements of the depressed classes wherever tracts of forests lands are available as has
been done by the Mysore Government;
(c)
whether they intend to give preferential treatment to applicants from the depressed
classes for forest lands ?
The
Honourable Mr. G. B. Pradhan: (a) No.
(b)
Such settlements have already been formed in the three Khandesh Divisions, and the
feasibility of forming further settlements will be considered if applications are made and
suitable lands in forests are available.
(c) Application from depressed classes for
forest lands will be favourably considered, but no promise of preferential treatment can
be held out. (B.L.C. Debates, Vol. XXI, pp. 269-70, dated 1st October 1927)
Deccan
Agriculturists' Relief Act: Repeal
Dr. B. R.
Ambedkar : Will Government be pleased to state (a) whether it is a fact that they are
contemplating the introduction of a bill to repeal the Deccan Agriculturists' Relief Act;
(b)
if so, whether they have ascertained the views of the agricultural population whose
interests are bound to be affected by such a step;
(c) whether they are aware that the Royal
Commission on Agriculture has expressed the opinion that the operation of the Usurious
Loans Act, 1918, has not been successful ?
The
Honourable Mr. J. R. Martin : (a) and (b)
The question of amending or repealing the Deccan Agriculturists' Relief Act has been
postponed till the question of legislation in connection with agricultural indebtedness
recommended by the Royal Agricultural Commission can be taken
up as a whole. (c) Yes. (B.L.C. Debates, Vol. XXIV, p. 287,
dated 29th September ]928)
Government Servants: Salaries and Pensions
Dr. B.
R. Ambedkar: Will Government be pleased to state the total amount they
paid out in 1927-28 (or any other year previous to it for which figures are
available)
(i) as salaries to their permanent servant in
the subordinate and clerical services;
(ii) as pensions to servants who were in their subordinate and
clerical services ?
The
Honourable Mr. G. B. Pradhan: (i) Figures of the cost of permanent and temporary
establishments are not separately available. The total amount expended by the Provincial
Government during 1925-26 on the salaries of their subordinate establishments was Rs. 296
lakhs excluding the cost (amounting to about Rs. 25 lakhs) of the menial establishments.
(ii) Government regret that they are unable
to furnish the information asked for as separate figures for different classes of
establishments are not readily available. (B.L.C. Debates, Vol. XXIV, p. 287, dated 29th
September 1928)
Government Servants: Starting Pay of
Graduates
Dr. P. G.
Solanki on behalf of Dr. B. R. Ambedkar: Will Government be pleased to state
(a)
whether it is a fact that Mr. S. K. Bole had put a question in the Council asking for
information about the starting pay of Graduates in the City of Bombay;
(b) whether it is a fact that Government replied that Graduates
were started on Rs. 90 except those serving in the Lower Grade in those offices, where the
establishments are divided into " Upper and Lower
Grades," and that Government issued Government
Resolution, Finance Department, No. 1140, dated 25th March 1925 directing the Heads of
Departments accordingly;
(c) whether it is
a fact that inspite of the above mentioned Government Resolution directing the Heads of
Departments to start Graduates on Rs. 90 in the City of Bombay, the Collector of Bombay
starts Graduates on Rs. 60 only in the departments under him, even though there are no
Upper and Lower Grades in those departments;
(d)
whether Government are aware that Graduates start on
Rs. 70 in the mofussil ?
The
Honourable Mr. G. B. Pradhan: (a) Yes.
(b)
Government replied that all Heads of Offices in Bombay were authorised to pay an initial
salary of Rs. 90 to all graduates except those in the Lower Division in those offices in
which the establishment is divided into Upper and Lower Divisions. Orders to the above
effect were issued in Government Resolution, Finance Department, No. 1140, dated 25th
March 1925.
(c) Under the orders referred to by the
Honourable Member Government have authorised their Heads of Offices to start graduates,
except those in the Lower Division in those offices in which the establishment is divided
into Upper and Lower Divisions, on an initial pay of Rs. 90 per mensem in the revised time
scale. According to the above orders the Collector of Bombay gives an initial pay of Rs.
90 per mensem to a graduate where he thinks that a graduate clerk is absolutely necessary
whereas in other cases graduates are given rates of pay ranging from Rs. 60 to Rs. 90
according to the importance of the work assigned to them. (d) Yes.
(B.L.C. Debates, Vol. XXV, p. 685, dated 28th
February 1929)
Land
Acquisition : Mulshi Dam
Dr. P. G.
Solanki on behalf of Dr. B. R. Ambedkar: Will Government be pleased to state
(a)
whether the lands of the Mahars of Mohari and Wadgaon, taluka Haveli, district Poona, were
acquired by Government on account of the Mulshi dam;
(b)
the rates at which the lands were acquired;
(c)
whether the price of the lands was paid to the Mahars of these villages ?
The
Honourable Mr. J. L. Rieu: (a) Yes.
(b)
Rs. 50 per acre for Jirait land and Rs. 550 per acre for Gadi (rice) lands.
(c) The lands being service inam, the sums
awarded were credited to Government and an annual cash allowance calculated at 5 per cent.
of the total amount of the compensation was sanctioned for the watandar Mahars.
(B.L.C. Debates, Vol. XXV, p. 767, dated 1st
March 1927)
Grants-in-aid
to Local Boards
Dr. P. G.
Solanki on behalf of Dr. B. R. Ambedkar: Will Government be pleased to state
(a)
whether it is a fact that the question of grants to Local Boards has been kept pending for
nearly 3 years by the Director of Public Instruction; (b) if so, who is responsible for the delay;
(c) what steps, if any. Government propose to
take in the matter ? The Honourable Moulvi Rafiuddin
Ahmed: (a) If the honourable member refers to grants by Government on account of
primary education the provisional grants made yearly to district local boards or local
authorities are often in excess of the actual amount shown to be due after audit. The
final adjustment of these yearly grants are made later when audit objections have been
met. (b) Does not arise.
(c) No alteration of the existing procedure
is contemplated. (B.L.C. Debates, Vol. XXV, p. 1092, dated 7th March 1929)
Bombay
Municipal CorporationMorland Road
Dr. B. R.
Ambedkar: Will Government be pleased to state(a) whether it is a fact that the
Bombay Municipal Corporation has not completely
re-constructed Morland Road even once during the last 15 years, and, if so, the reasons
therefor ;
(b)
whether Government intend to take any steps in the matter; (c) whether it is a fact that the matter was
represented to the Police Authorities and to the Municipal Corporation through
representations and in the Press ?
The
Honourable Dewan Bahadur Harilal D. Desai: (a) It is not a fact that the road has not
been repaired during the last 15 years. During the period 1914 to 1921 the whole road was
repaired regularly and in 1920-21 the entire length was repaired and the surface dressed
with a paint coat of tar at a cost of Rs. 11,640-15-3. Since 1922 substantial repairs have
not been carried out, but extensive patching of the road surface has been frequently done.
The Corporation has given its consent to the re-construction of the road with sheet
asphalt on cement concrete foundations and the work will be taken in hand in due course.
(b)
No.
(c) Complaints have been made to the
Corporation.
(B.L.C.
Debates, Vol. XXV. p. 1092, dated 7th March 1929)
Secondary Schools; Grants-in-aid
Dr. P. G.
Solanki for Dr. B. R. Ambedkar : Will Government be pleased to state
(a)
the reasons why the question of reorganising the basis of assessing annual grants to
Secondary Schools was not considered last year;
(b)
whether there are any schools in the Presidency that have deserved special consideration
from Government in point of receiving regular grants-in-aid ;
(c) whether in assessing grants to Secondary
Schools the Director of Public Instruction is invariably guided by the inspection reports
of the Educational Inspectors ? If not, what is generally his standard of distributing
annual grants to Secondary Schools ;
(d)
whether the Educational Department observe, in order to maintain the departmental standard
of efficiency, some basis on which the aided Schools are expected to spend per capita
annually, and the Government on the other hand are expected to share the corresponding
cost ? If so, what is the minimum ratio between the cost to the Government and the
institution according to the basis ;
(c) the minimum number of years after which a
Secondary School is given registration by the Education Department;
(f)
the number of Secondary Schools of over 5 years' standing that have not yet been
permanently registered for grant-in-aid ?
The
Honourable Moulvi Rafiuddin
Ahmed: (a) Government were generally satisfied that the basis on which grants to
Secondary Schools are assessed is sound. (b) Yes.
(c) Grants are assessed according to the
principles laid down in the Grant-in-aid Code. In framing his estimate of the extent to
which a particular school satisfies the requirements of the Grant-in-aid Code, the
Director of Public Instruction is invariably guided by the reports of the Inspecting
staff. The question in the latter portion does not therefore arise.
(d)
No definite standard of expenditure per capita is observed in assessing expenditure for
grant. The system laid down in the Grant-in-aid Code provides for grants at the rate of
one-third of the admitted expenditure being given to all schools which satisfy the
requirements, subject to the funds allotted for the purpose permitting.
(e) No minimum number of years is prescribed.
Owing to lack of funds the registration of additional schools has been suspended. (f)
About 110 schools.
(B.L.C. Debates, Vol. XXVIII, pp. 585-86,
dated 27th February 1980)
UNIVERSITY REFORMS COMMITTEE
(Refer Chapter 7, page 48)
OF UNIVERSITY REFORM IN
BOMBAY PRESIDENCY
(The Bombay Government appointed a Committee
to look into the problem of reform of the Bombay University. This Committee consisted of
13 members with Sir Chimanlal H. Setalvad, Kt. as its Chairman. Dr. Ambedkar was not a
member of this committee but he was one of the 321 persons to whom the committee sent its
questionnaire of 54 questions. Dr. Ambedkar replied only some of the questions which he
considered worth replying. The questions replied by Dr. Ambedkar are alone reproduced here
to be followed by his evidence.Editor.)
1. What in your opinion should be the aim and
function of University education in the Bombay Presidency ? Do you consider that the
existing system of University education in this Presidency affords the young Indians of
this Presidency adequate opportunities of attaining this aim ? If not, in what main
respects do you consider the existing system deficient ?
2. Do you consider that the defects pointed
out by you mainly lie in or spring from (a) the
spirit and methods of instructor or pupil; (b)
the conditions of education, antecedent to the students' entrance of the University; or
(c) the administrative or educational machinery of the University ?
3. How far in your opinion has the University
promoted knowledge of, and mutual interest? in and sympathy for, the history and culture
of the different communities in this Presidency ? Can you suggest means by which this can
be further promoted ?
II.
Secondary and Intermediate Education (Questions 4-7)
4. Do you consider the training and
attainments of students coming out of our High Schools sufficient preparation for entering
upon University education ? If you consider this preparation inadequate, have you any
suggestions for the improvement of the present conditions ?
5. Do you consider the creation in this
Presidency of (a) a new set of institutions in intermediate between High Schools and
University; (b) a new Board of Secondary and
Intermediate Education such as was proposed by the Calcutta University Commission
necessary or desirable ? If so, how should such institutions and such a Board be
constituted and financed ?
6. If you consider intermediate institutions,
with or without an Intermediate Board, unnecessary or undesirable, how without them could
the level, range and effectiveness of existing High School education in this Presidency be
improved ?
7. How may the University best secure the
maintenance of efficiency in the institutions that send students to it for admission ?
III.
Functions of the University of Bombay (Questions 8-24)
(a)
Teaching (Questions 8-13)
8. In what directions is it necessary and
practicable as well as advisable, in your judgement, to extend the function of the
University of Bombay so as to make it predominantly a teaching University ?
9. Do you consider that the University
should, in addition to postgraduate teaching take any direct part in under-graduate
teaching ? If so, how would you reconcile and co-ordinate the teaching functions of the
University with those of the existing teaching institutions ?
10. If you do not consider the University
should take any direct part in under-graduate teaching, how by proper co-ordination would
you utilise to the best advantage the existing facilities for under-graduate study ?
IV.
Additional University in Bombay Presidency (Questions 25-30)
25. Is it desirable to constitute any
additional Universities within the Bombay Presidency ? What Centres of higher education in
the Presidency do you consider
(a)
ripe for immediate expansion into Universities, (b)
likely to be ripe in the near future, and on what grounds ? 28. How would the institution
of additional Universities affect the existing University of Bombay ? How would you secure
co-operation, co-ordination, and reciprocity between the University of Bombay and the new
University ? What arrangement do you suggest for the period of transition ?
VII.
Constitution (Questions 36-40)
36. What defects do you find in the
constitutional machinery of the University of Bombay ?
37. What should be the strength, composition,
duration of office, method of constituting and powers and functions of the Senate ? Who,
if any, should be ex-officio, life, and
nominated members of the Senate ? How does your method of constituting the Senate secure
the representation of all interests and communities ?
38. Do you consider that it is necessary or
desirable to decentralise the powers and functions hitherto exercised by the Syndicate of
the Bombay University ? If so, what powers or functions would you remove from the
Syndicate and to what new or existing bodies of the University would you assign them ? How
should the Syndicate so reorganised and any new bodies you may propose be composed ?
39. What functions and powers would you
assign to the Faculties and Boards of Studies ? How should these bodies be constituted and
appointed ?
III.
Functions of the University of Bombay (Questions 8-24)
(c) Prescribing
Courses and Examining (Questions 16-19)
16. How in your opinion has the University
been discharging the functions of (a) conducting
examinations, (b) prescribing courses of study,
and (c) appointing text-books ? Would you suggest any modifications in the exercise of
these functions ?
17. How far can University examinations be
profitably replaced or supplemented by other means of testing proficiency, intelligence
and competence ?
18. On what branches of study should the
Bombay University undertake the teaching immediately and in the near future ?
19. In considering the extension of the
teaching functions of the University of Bombay and bearing in mind the special
requirements of the people of Bombay, would you suggest the institution of any more
faculties e.g. of Fine Arts or Technology so as to make the scope of the University
broader, more liberal and more comprehensive ? (d)
Post-Graduate Courses and Degrees (Questions 20-21)
20. When the Bombay University further
develops its teaching functions, what should be the duration of studies for post-graduate
degrees ? How would you award such degrees, whether by examination, thesis, original
research or a combination of one or more of these ?
21. Do you wish to institute any new degrees honoris causa and, if so, on what grounds would
you have them awarded ? (c) Promoting Research
(Questions 22-23).
22. How can the University best encourage and
guide independent investigation of Indian and especially Bombay's problems, whether
historical, economic, sociological, industrial, or other ?
23. Is there any need for the creation of a
University Press and Publication Department ? How might such Department be organised and
financed ? (f) Appointing University Teachers
(Question 24) 24. In a Bombay Teaching University what should be the method of selecting
and appointing University Professors, Readers, Lecturers etc. ? What qualifications are
requisite in them ? What range of salaries do they require ? What should be the conditions
regulating their appointment and tenure of office ?
IV.
Additional Universities in Bombay Presidency (Questions 25-30)
30. What principles or policy should be
followed by (a) the Bombay University, (b) any
new University within this Presidency in permitting the opening of any new College or
Institution, constituent or affiliated ?
V.
Relation of the University and the Public (Questions 31-34)
31. How far do you consider the curricula of
the Bombay University satisfy the needs of Agricultural, Industrial, Professional and
Public-life in the Presidency, and especially in the City of Bombay ?
32. Can you suggest method of promoting
cordial relation and co-operation between the University and other public bodies whether
industrial, commercial, professional, municipal or Government ?
33. What measures should be taken to bring
the University and its working into closer relation with the industrial and commercial
life and interests of the City?
34. What should be the extent and purpose of
the University's contribution to the education of the adult non-collegiate population ?
How should the University organise extension lectures, vacation terms and other measures
to this end ?
VI. Relation of University and Government (Question
35)
35. What should be the relation of the
Government of India and of the Government of Bombay to the University of Bombay and to any
new Universities that may be created ? What modifications, if any, do you think necessary
in the existing powers of the Chancellor and of Government to control University finance,
legislation, appointments of University Officers and Teachers and membership of University
bodies ? What should be the relation, if any, of the Director of Public Instruction and
the Minister in charge of Education to the University ?
VIII.
Curricula (Questions 41-44)
41. Are you generally satisfied with the
subject and curricula at present prescribed for the various University Examinations ? If
not, can you indicate the changes you desire ?
42. Are you in favour of establishing (a) an
absolute or (b) a greater differentiation of the
pass and honours courses ? How would such differentiation affect the Colleges and
Students?
43. Would you approve of an absolute
exclusion of science from the Arts Courses ? Do you approve of the present dissociation of
Literature and Arts from the study of science ?
44. Do you consider the existing courses for
the Bachelor's and Master's degree provide a sufficient variety of options and
satisfactory combinations and correlation of Courses of Study ?
IX. Use
of the Vernacular (Questions 45-46)
45. To what stage and to what extent do you
consider the vernacular can and should be used to replace English as the medium of
instruction and examination (a) in Bombay, (b) in any newly constituted University ? What
safeguards do you suggest to secure that the standard of English required by students does
not suffer from such replacement ?
46. What do you consider the best method of
promoting the scientific study of the Vernaculars of this Presidency and for encouraging
the production of good vernacular literature of all kinds ?
XIII.
Special Communities (Question 52)
52. Do you consider any special measures are
required for the promotion of University education in any particular community ?
*[f3]WRITTEN EVIDENCE BY DR.
B. R. AMBEDKAR
Question
1: I agree with the Inspectors of the Board of Education in England that the aim and
functions of University Education should be to see that the teaching carried on there is
suited to adults ; that it is scientific, detached and impartial in character; that it
aims not so much at filling the mind of the student with fact or theories as at calling
forth bis own individuality, and stimulating him to mental effort; that it accustoms him
to the critical study of the leading authorities, with perhaps, occasional reference to
first hand sources of information, and that it implants in his mind a standard of
thoroughness, and gives him a sense of the difficulty as well as the value of reaching at
truth. The student so trained should learn to distinguish between what may fairly be
called matter of fact and what is certainly mere matter of opinion. He should be
accustomed to distinguish issues, and to look at separate questions each on its own merits
and without an eye to their bearing on some cherished theory. He should learn to state
fairly, and even sympathetically, the position of those to whose practical conclusions he
is most stoutly opposed. He should become able to examine a suggested idea, and see what
comes of it, before accepting it or rejecting it. Without necessarily becoming an original
student he should gain an insight into the conditions under which original research is
carried on. He should be able to weigh evidence, to follow and criticise argument and put
his own value on authorities.
I see no reason why the aim and functions of
the University Education in the Bombay Presidency should be different. Judged by the
quality of the students it turns out it must be said that the existing system of
University Education in this Presidency has totally failed to realise the aim and
functions of University Education.
Question
2: It is possible that this failure springs
partly from the spirit and methods of the instructor, partly of the pupils and partly from
the conditions of education antecedent to the students' entrance to the University. In my
opinion, however, the failure springs mainly from the administrative and educational
machinery of the University. Before a University can be in a position to fulfil the aims
and functions of University Education it must be so organized that it becomes essentially
a place of learning, where a Corporation of Scholars labour in comradeship for the
training of men and the advancement and diffusion of knowledge. In the light of these
remarks it will be obvious that the Bombay University in the first place is no true
University. It is not a Corporation of Scholars. It does not undertake the training of men
and it is not directly interested in the advancement and diffusion of knowledge. On the
other hand, the Bombay University in respect of its administration and educational
machinery is what a University ought not to be. It is a Corporation of Administrators. It
is only concerned with the examination of candidates while the advancement and diffusion
of knowledge is outside the ambit of its interests.
Question
3: The University of Bombay has not promoted knowledge of and mutual interest in and
sympathy for the history and culture of the different communities in this Presidency. A
purely examining University that does not concern itself with inculcating the love of
learning cannot achieve this object. And it seems to me that the only way of success along
this line is first of all to convert the University into a Teaching University.
Questions
4-7:I do not feel I am competent to answer
these questions satisfactorily. I agree that a great deal depends upon what kind of "
stuff " the University gets from the high schools. How to get the right kind of stuff
is a problem with every University. But I cannot understand why a University should be
required to enter upon the control of high schools in order to compel them to produce the
required kind of stuff. I know of no University that has undertaken this responsibility.
All that the Universities do is to hold their own entrance examination whereby they select
the kind of stuff they want by their test papers. I do not see why the Bombay University
should be called upon to do more.
Questions
8-10: There are in my opinion two distinct problems that must arise in any attempt
that may be made for converting the University of Bombay into a Teaching University. They
are (0 how to convert it into a Commission which recommended that the Universities might
justify their existence as teaching bodies by making further provision for advanced
courses Teaching University and (ii) how to
organize its teaching. With the first problem I will deal when I come to questions 36-40.
Here I will deal with the second problem. In the Incorporation Act of 1857 no provision
was made for allowing the University to undertake teaching functions. The Act of 1904 for
the first time described the University as being incorporated for the purpose (among
others) of "making provision for the instruction of students ", a phrase which
might seem to have been intended to include undergraduates in putting into practice this
clause all the older Universities have followed the University of study. As a result of
this we find today that the undergraduate teaching has been separated from the
postgraduate teaching, the former being taken up by the University and the latter left to
the colleges.
I am totally opposed to any such sharp
division between post-graduate and undergraduate training. My reasons are as follows
:
(1) The separation of post-graduate work from
undergraduate work means the separation of teaching from research. But it is obvious that
that where research is divorced from teaching research must suffer. As has been well
observed by the Commissioners of 1911 on University Education in London.
" 69. Teaching will, of course,
predominate in the earlier work, and research will predominatle in the advance work : but
it is in the best interests of the University that the most distinguished of its
professors should take part in the teaching of the undergraduates from the beginning of
their University career. It is only by coming into contact with the junior students that a
teacher can direct their minds to his own conception of his subject, and train them in his
own methods and hence obtain the double advantage of selecting the best men for research,
and getting the best work out of them. Again it is the personal influence of the man doing
original work in his subject which inspires belief in it, awakens enthusiasm, gains
disciples. His personality is the selective power by which those who are fittest for his
special work are voluntarily enlisted in its services and his individual influence is
reproduced and extended by the spirit which actuates his staff. Neither is it the few
alone who gain; all honest students gain inestimably from association with teachers who
show them something of the working of the thought of independent and original minds. ' Any
one ', says Helmholtz, ' who has once come into contact with one or more men of the first
rank must have had his whole mental standard altered for the rest of his life '. Lectures
have not lost their use and books can never fully take the place of the living spoken
word. Still less can they take the place of the more intimate teaching in laboratory and
seminar, which ought not to be beyond the range of the ordinary course of a university
education, and in which the student learns, not only conclusions and the reasons
supporting them, all of which he might get from books but the actual process of developing
thought, the working of the highly trained and original mind."
" 70. If it is thus to be desired that
the highest university teachers should take their part in undergraduate work and that
their spirit dominate it all, it follows for the same reasons that they should not be
deprived of the best of their students when they reach the stage of post-graduate work.
This work should not be separated from the rest of the work of the University, and
conducted by different teachers in separate institutions. As far as the teacher is
concerned it is necessary that he should have post-graduate students under him. He must be
doing original work himself, and he often obtains material assistance from the
co-operation of advanced students. Their very difficulties are full of suggestions, and
their faith and enthusiasm are a pay source of refreshment and strength. He escapes the
flagging spirit and and the moods of lethargy which are apt to overtake the solitary
worker. There can be no question of a higher class of teachers than the professors of the
University, or the whole position of the University will be degraded. On the other hand, a
university teacher of the highest rank will naturally desire to have as his post-graduate
students those students whom he has already begun to train in his own methods, though his
laboratory or seminar will, of course, be open to students who come from other
universities, and to some perhaps who come from no university at all, as well as to some
who come from other teachers of the University of London. There must be a great deal of
give and take, and students may often gain by studying under more than one teacher of the
same subject; but that is an entirely different thing from separating the higher work from
the lower. We do not think it would be possible to get the best men for University
Professorship it they were in any way restricted from doing the highest work or prevented
from spreading their net wide to catch the best students."
"71. It is also a great disadvantage to
the undergraduate students of the University that post-graduate students should be removed
to separate institutions. They ought to be in constant contact with those who are doing
more advanced work than themselves, and who are not too far beyond them, but stimulate and
encourage them by the familiar presence of an attainable ideal."
The disastrous consequences which follow to
advanced research work where it is separated from teaching have become patent at least to
me. It is a notorious fact that many Indian students who have returned with postgraduate
degrees from the University of London and other universities have been failures in the
sense that they have failed to master their subjects although some of them occupy the
highest posts in the educational line. The reason for this is to be found in the fact that
their under-graduate training was utterly insufficient for advanced research work. The
Committee will remember that post-graduate training is very modem in its origin and
conception. There were men at Cambridge and Oxford who did a great deal of excellent work
although those universities did not have post-graduate departments. Even now the men at
the head of post-graduate departments at Oxford, Cambridge and London are only graduates
and yet they are doing their work of directing post-graduate research remarkably well so
as to attract students from all parts of the world. The reason is that their undergraduate
training was of a high order. I am, therefore, bound to emphasise that the University must
undertake the training of the undergraduates if it intends to rear a structure of a sound
system of post-graduate work.
(2) Secondly, the assumption by the
University of direct responsibility for teaching in the post-graduate sphere by its own
staff which is regarded as a great reform tends to produce the unhappy effect of placing
the university staff in antithesis and in opposition to the college staff which feels that
its status is unreasonably reduced by the formal and practically permanent limitation of
the colleges to an inferior sphere of work.
(3) Thirdly, the establishment of a distinct
University Professoriate for post-graduate work is a sheer waste of the resources of the
University and can be easily avoided by a proper husbanding of the resources of the
colleges. In our system of University education the colleges are the only places of
learning. But they are at present the property of separate bodies and the management of
each college is vested in a separate governing body. The income derive from a college goes
to its own fund. If there is any surplus after the necessary expenses it only serves to
swell this fund. Each college teaches the same subjects as the rest and is so to say a '
pocket ' university obliged to maintain a competent staff to teach all the subjects and to
provide separate libraries and laboratories for their own use. Autonomous as these
colleges are none of them is financially a wealthy institution to be able to engage a
first class and adequate staff and to provide a first class and adequate equipment in the
form of libraries and laboratories. Owing to their slender resources the college staff is
handicapped and overburdened. Being obliged to teach too many subjects specialization
becomes impossible and a college professor under these circumstances has neither the
inducement nor the opportunity to become the master of a small branch of a great subject. As an inevitable result of this
system of autonomous self-sufficing colleges we have scattered here and there poor
professoriates, poor libraries and poor laboratories. But because the existing resources
seem insufficient when looked upon as attached to or dissipated among the different
colleges it does not follow that the resources of the colleges in the aggregate are not
great enough to cope with the teaching of the post-graduate and undergraduate work of the
Bombay University. Take for instance the resources of the colleges situated in the City of
Bombay for the purpose of teaching economics.
We have in the City of Bombay the following
colleges providing training in Economics for the B.A. Course of the Bombay University
:(1) Elphin-stone College, (2) Wilson College, (3) St. Xavier's College and (4)
Sydenham College. There are two men teaching economics at the Elphinstone, two at the
Wilson, two at the St. Xavier's and some six or so at the Sydenham College. Together there
are about 12 men in the City of Bombay engaged in the teaching of economics. I know of no
university in the world which has such a large number of men engaged in the teaching of
one subject and yet all this plethora of professors is running to waste merely for the
want of a better organization. And the University instead of attempting to stop this waste
had added to it by the appointing of two more professors of its own to the existing lot.
It is however obvious that if these colleges
could be induced to pool their teaching and library resources it would not only produce a
strong specialised professoriate but it will produce a professoriate adequate to deal with
both undergraduate and post-graduate work and thus obviate the waste of university
resources on the two university chairs of economics. To bring this about one has only to
arrange that these twelve men do combine together to distribute among themselves the work
of carrying out the economics curriculum of the University and agree to lecture to all
students taking that course irrespective of the colleges in which they are enrolled. The
same plan could be easily adopted in organizing the teaching of other subjects in the
colleges in the City of Bombay. The only difficulty probably in the way of this plan is of
the students having to run from college to college to attend these lectures. This
difficulty can be easily met. I should say that all lectures on Political Science shall be
delivered at the Sydenham College. All lectures on Philosophy and Psychology shall be
delivered at the Wilson College and all lectures on Literature and languages shall be
delivered at the Elphinstone College. By this arrangement the frequent run of students
between colleges will be entirely obviated. The colleges should be declared to be halls of
lectures on a particular subject and the lectures while remaining on the foundations of
their respective colleges will coalesce together so as to form a homogeneous group and
will have rooms at the college which is assigned for the subject they will be dealing
with, and which will contain the portions of the libraries of the colleges on that
particular subject.
I agree that University should be a
centralised institution and if the plan of a new University were to be laid down ab integro it would be better to rule out the
type in which a university was to be composed of affiliated colleges. But it must be
recognized that universities cannot be sown broadcast and that where a number of
institutions of collegiate status have come into being they cannot be lightly abolished in
order to promote the success of centralizing institution. Under the plan I have outlined
neither the standard of university education nor the independence of colleges is
sacrificed. Administratively the colleges remain independent. Educationally they become
integral parts of the University. In short the position becomes somewhat like the position
at Oxford and Cambridge where the university is the colleges and the colleges form the
university. Such an organization makes the most of the existing colleges and eliminates
the waste.
Question
25 : My scheme of organizing University
Education applies only to those centres where
the colleges are situated in close proximity. If this scheme is to be utilised on a large
scale the first thing to do is to control the location of colleges so that they shall be
established in close proximity. In other words it is necessary to prevent adventurous
educationists from opening individual autonomous colleges in all sorts of unseemly and
unpromising towns. When one recalls the waste, duplication and dissipation of resources
involved in the existence of such separate and scattered colleges one is surprised to see
that such anarchical situation should have been tolerated so far. I regard it a great
piece of good fortune for the Bombay Presidency that the growth of these isolated colleges
has not as yet become so rank and wild as in Bengal. But steps must be taken at once to
counteract the establishment of scattered colleges at random if the standard of University
Education is to be maintained. For this purpose I should lay down the centres of
University Education in this Presidency and should not allow any college to be started at
any other place. In my opinion the following places should be marked as actual or
potential centres of University Education:
IBombay |
VIHyderabad
(potential). |
IIPoona |
VIIDharwar
(potential). |
IllAhmedabad |
VIIISangli
(potential). |
IVSurat (potential) |
IXNasik (potential). |
vKarachi |
XAmalner
(potential). |
Having defined the centres of University
education the next thing to do is to organize the teaching at those places. At most of the
above University centres there is as yet only a single college providing education in
Arts. Only in Bombay and Poona are there groups of colleges in close proximity. There the
problem of University teaching can be easily solved by permutation and combination of the
various college staffs into departments. At those centres where there are as yet only a
single isolated college the problem of providing education of the university type can be
solved in two ways (1) by allowing the foundation of new colleges in close proximity of
the existing ones for the purpose of teaching one particular subject or (2) by recognizing
the existing college as a university and to allow it to expand by starting new departments
of study. The former plan seems to be easier of success. But the latter would be better
from the standpoint of efficiency. By adopting this policy instead of having a number of
colleges scattered through the different parts of the Presidency to meet the educational
demands in those parts of the Presidency we would be able to have other universities in
other parts of the Presidency to meet the educational demands in those parts. By this we
may not have achieved the ideal of a centralised university. But we may at least be
achieving the next best of having all the colleges which are affiliated to a university
situated in the university town in close proximity of one another to combine together in
intellectual co-operation and make the university so to say a living personality.
Question
28: Bombay and Poona are the only places ripe
for immediate expansion into universities and I suggest that these be at once incorporated
into separate universities. Ahmedabad is likely to be ripe in the near future. It has
already an Arts College and a Science Institute and may be converted into a University.
Pending the establishment of universities in
the centres marked above the three universities of Bombay, Poona and Ahmedabad should have
an external side like the University of London whereby arrangements could be made to grant
degrees to students of the other colleges appearing at their examinations.
If the future universities to be established
in this Presidency shape themselves into centralised institutions then the problems raised
in these questions will not arise. For, then, the university will be in full control of
its staff and teaching arrangements. But I will assume that our future universities will
be a cluster or constituent colleges independent in their organization. At any rate it
will be so of the new universities of Bombay and Poona. Under the scheme of having
constituent colleges, the colleges will still continue to be places licensed by the
university to provide University education. The plan of infer-collegiate teaching will
remove the waste duplication and dissipation of resources by the constituent colleges. But
will that arrangements be sufficient to ensure that the standard of university education
will be maintained at a high level. That depends upon the standing of the teaching staff
engaged in imparting University education. At present the teachers are attached to the
colleges and their pay and status are regulated by the authorities governing the colleges.
But the colleges do not seem to be making the appointments solely from the sense of
obtaining the most qualified persons nor regulating their grades, tenure, pay and
promotion in such a manner as to open a career to the best and most qualified member of
the staff. The whole educational work carried on by Government is entrusted to the
educational services in the three grades of which are included all the administrative and
inspecting officers, and all the teachers in Government colleges and schools from the most
responsible to the most junior. As in all services the principle of seniority is so deeply
rooted that it has become a sacred convention that all superior posts should go by
seniority. The principal drawback of this system so far as the work of University
education is concerned is that rewards are regulated not by depth of scholarship but by
the length of service. Teachers of a college who are subject to be transferred from place
to place as is the case with the members of the Government service cannot but feel that
the body corporate which claims their loyalty and obedience is not the college but the
service and more often than not their ambition is directed to securing service promotions
than that of creating a school of learning with which their names will be identified. The invidious distinction drawn
between the I.E.S. and P.E.S. is another weakness of the service system in that it tempts
even the very junior members of the former to regard themselves as the superior of the
most senior and distinguished members of the latter. This introduces an element of
friction among the members of the college staff rendering difficult that free and friendly
co-operation which is so indispensable to promote the intellectual life of any educational
institution. Last but by no means the least in importance is the fact that under the
present circumstances the professors in the Government colleges by reason of their being
servants of the Government have lost the confidence of their students. The students
instead of regarding their professors as their intellectual leaders regard them as the
agents of Government and the professors receiving no response from their students drudge
on without kindling their interest and winning their allegiance. In the colleges
maintained by Missionary bodies the leading members of the staff are European
Missionaries. The rest of the staff consists of Indian teachers. The distinction between
the I.E.S. and P.E.S. is reproduced there on a small scale though it is not quite so
emphasized as to produce open friction. In the private colleges maintained by Societies,
such as the Deccan Education Society all the members of the staff are the members of the
Society. The staff here is therefore more homogeneous and has nothing in its organization
to lead to any cleavage. But the constitution of these colleges restricts them to the
appointment of men who care to become life members of the Societies which control them. I
cannot speak very definitely about the prospects offered by these private colleges but it
is certain that they are very poor even when compared with the lowest grades in the
Government colleges and indeed they are so poor that they cannot attract men of moderate
attainments unless the same can afford to maintain a large margin of disinterestedness.
But it is not the private colleges alone that fail to procure proper persons to fill their
vacant posts. Even Government colleges with the best of prospects seldom succeed in
hitting upon the right sort of a person. The reason is that neither have any proper
machinery for making a judicious selection. In the case of Government colleges it is the
Director of Public Instruction or the Secretary to Government that makes the choice. But
as a matter of fact they are the most inexpert people for this task. Similarly the
appointments in the private colleges are mostly in the hands of the heads of the colleges
and they too are incapable of making proper choices. The fault lies in not recognizing
that to assess the merits of a person one must belong to his kind. It will take an
economist to judge an economist.
Quite apart however from these difficulties
and drawback there is no possible means of bringing a University staff thus recruited by
the different colleges into a due relation, as regards either its members or its
distribution, to University needs. The University might find itself supplied with half a
dozen professors of one subject and without a single in another equally important branch
of knowledge. University organization cannot proceed on these lines, and the difficulties
described above can be removed only by placing the appointments of all teachers of the
University in the hands of the University itself acting through the Academic Council (see constitution of the new University) or at
least by giving the University an effective voice in their appointment.
I therefore propose that the collegiate
branch of the Educational Service should be separated from the Administrative branch and
should be placed under the University with proper safeguards. In other words the teachers'
posts at the different colleges should be converted into chairs attached to and supported
by certain foundations in the present case by the private colleges and Government. But the
appointments to these chairs should be controlled by the University.
I attach the greatest importance to the
control of the University over the appointment of its teaching staff. Hitherto the
University of Bombay has attempted to maintain the standard of University education by
means of its power to test it by a rigid system of examination. The result has been a
gradual lowering of the calibre of its graduates. This is principally to be attributed to
the egregious error committed by the fathers of our University education in not at all
recognizing that the only means of maintaining the standard of University education are
the rigid exclusion of students who are unfit for University studies and the existence of
a body of highly qualified and productive teachers, organized in departments adequately
equipped. In other words they attempted to maintain the standard of the University degrees
without attempting to maintain the standard of the teachers and the taught. When events
are moving us in the direction of making the University of Bombay a teaching University,
it must be clearly realised that " the power to control teaching is of more
importance than the power to test it by granting degrees ". A University cannot
become a teaching University unless its academic affairs, i.e., teaching and examination
are left to the uncontrolled discretion of those engaged in teaching. But it will be fatal
to the standard of a University degree if the University reposed such a large trust in a
body of teachers in whose calibre it has no confidence. I therefore propose that the
University should have the power of purse over the colleges. All Government grants to the
colleges should be made through the University, so that the University will have a voice
in the appointment of the staff of teachers and their equipment in the matter of libraries
and laboratories.
Qnestions
36-39: If a University as a corporation of learning is to serve the community, then
its constitution must provide (a) for a body
which will keep it in touch with all varied requirements of the community; (b) for a body which will give the University a
statesman-like guidance in the provision and also in accommodation of means to ends so as
to bring about a working comprise between the possible misconceptions of the public and
the possibly too narrow outlook of the scholar; and (c) for a body of scholars engaged in
the work of teaching to give an authoritative direction to the academic business of the
University.
I want to impress upon the Committee that a
University does not become a teaching University merely by engaging in the work of
teaching through the agency of its own staff. That is not the criterion of a teaching
University. A University may undertake teaching and yet may not be a teaching University.
Whether or not a University is a teaching University depends upon whether or not the
scholars engaged in the work of teaching have the authoritative direction of the academic
business of the University in their hands. If it is in their hands then the University is
a teaching University. If it is not in their hands then the University is not a teaching
University. A teaching University is a teachers University.
I am led to make these preliminary remarks
because I feel that the Committee in inviting answers to its questions on the constitution
is motivated by the desire to obtain such suggestions as will help to make the University
of Bombay a teaching University. The existing constitution of the University of Bombay
does not provide in any adequate or clear cut manner any of the three bodies I have said
to be necessary for a University to function properly. The Senate of the University is not
sufficiently representative of the life and interests of Bombay. The Syndicate has not the
responsibilities and powers which should devolve upon the Executive Council of a great
University and often has devolved upon it duties which it is absolutely unfit to perform.
While the teaching staff which is really the heart of the University has practically no
voice, let alone authoritative direction, in the academic affairs of the University.
To make the University of Bombay a teaching
University I would first of all proceed to the constitution of faculties. For this purpose
I will take it that my scheme of inter-collegiate teaching between the colleges situated
in the City of Bombay is adopted. Under that scheme the several studies pursued in the
colleges will naturally have to be grouped into Departments, e.g.. Economics, History,
Politics, Administration, Law, Literature, Languages, Chemistry, Physics, etc. It will be
admitted that students are receiving at a University their final systematic preparation
for one or other of the several occupations of life for which a University education is
necessary at any rate, the most advantageous preliminary.
To succeed in this it is necessary to group
together certain branches of knowledge which students pursue. Not only do the needs of
students require such a grouping but the needs of the teachers point in the same
direction, for it is obvious that certain studies have a closer relation between them and
there is a greater similarity in the point of view from which they are approached. These
forces emanating from the teachers and the taught have led everywhere the grouping of the
several departments of study into what are called Faculties. I suggest therefore that the
Departments in the new University of Bombay should be grouped into Faculties and the
Faculties should be made the basis of the University organisation if our University is to
be a teaching University. A faculty should consist, either wholly or mainly of the
Professors and Assistant Professors of the subjects comprised within the Faculty; and of
such other teachers and officers appointed by the University as the Faculty may co-opt.
The Vice-Chancellor should ex-officio be a
member of every faculty. A Faculty should have the power to make Regulations
(i) to appoint Committees consisting of the
Faculty together with other persons to act as Board of Studies and for other purposes;
(ii) to determine generally the conditions
for the award of degrees, diplomas, and other distinctions within the purview of the
Faculty:
(iii) to determine generally the course of
study to be pursued by students of the University in the subjects within the purview of
the Faculty ;
(iv) to determine generally the method and
manner of teaching and examination with regard to the subjects within the purview of the
Faculty. I must say again that if the Faculties are to be entrusted with the powers set
out above and the teachers are to be freed from the restrictions imposed by a common
syllabus of instruction and a general quasi-external examination, it is necessary to make
sure that the teachers are worthy of the trust imposed in them.
The Faculties should be the constituent
bodies of the University. Having constituted our Faculties to take charge of the academic
and educational work of the University, we must constitute a Central Governing Body to
take charge of the administrative work of the University. This body should correspond to
the existing Senate of the Bombay University but should be entirely different in character
and composition. In my opinion the Senate as a supreme governing body should be
comparatively a large body mainly non-professional in character but including
representatives of graduates and the teachers. The advantages of such a mode of government
are obvious. By mean? of a large Senate a number of influential citizens, chosen because
of their individual capacity, and of representatives of the great interests of the town,
municipal, administrative, commercial, legal, scientific, etc., and of members of
Legislative Council, the Assembly and the Council of State are brought into touch with the
University and serve as channels between the University and the community as a whole. Such
a Senate will be able to ask for support to the University with greater authority and
success and the whole city will feel interested in the success of the University.
But the Universities Commission of 1902
regarded it as a fault of the system and reported that the Senates of the Universities
were too bulky in numbers (in 1900 the Senate of the Bombay University consisted of 305
fellows) and incapable of exercising proper control in educational matters. That
Commission did not understand that the proper function of the Senate was not to control
the education but to keep the University in touch with all the varied requirements of the
community. That being the function of the Senate it must necessarily be large and varied
in its composition. I propose that the Senate of the University of Bombay should be
composed of 150 members. One of the most important changes effected under the Universities
Act of 1904 was the provision that two-fifths of the Ordinary Fellows should be associated
with the profession of teaching. As a preventive of the system in which Fellowships were
bestowed by way of compliment without due regard to the qualifications of the recipient
this proviso was a salutary proviso. But in view of the proposal I advocate of giving
greatly increased statutory powers to the Faculties, I do not think that the teachers in
the University need more representation on the Senate than is sufficient to enable each of
the Faculties to have a spokesman. I, therefore, propose to restrict the representation of
the teachers to the Deans of the Faculties. The rest of the Senate should be composed of
persons in the political or commercial world and interest in education may be able to
render the University substantial service.
The chief function of the Senate would be
legislation (1) to make statutes affecting the Government of the University and pass
resolutions,
(2) to confer all honorary degrees,
(3) to approve of the admission of
constituent colleges or University departments,
(4) to institute any new degree, diploma, or
certificate,
(5) to decide disputes between Faculties.
Having provided for the two bodies one to look after the Government of the University and
the other to take charge of the academic business of the University, we have now to
provide for third body charged with the provision and also the accommodation of means to ends. In other words there must be a Central
Executive of the University. This body should correspond to the existing Syndicate of the
Bombay University but should be entirely different in character and composition. The
Syndicate appears, both as to its composition and the conditions of its work, the least
satisfactory of all the University bodies. As a supreme executive the Syndicate should
have the custody and use of the Common Seal, the management of the whole revenue and
property of the University and (except as otherwise provided) the conduct of all the
affairs of the University. But instead of this the work of the Syndicate has been extended
over a wide field of business much of which might be conveniently entrusted to other and
more appropriate bodies. The existing system concentrates in a so-called executive the
work rather of discussion than of deliberate decision. I, therefore, propose to abolish
the Board of Accounts and transfer its functions to the Syndicate which shall have power
to determine
(1) The finance, investments and accounts of
the University.
(2) The amount and payment of fees to be
exacted within the University, or in relation to the enjoyment of privileges therefrom.
(3) The terms and mode of appointment, tenure
of and removal from office, duties, emoluments, allowances, salaries and superannuation
allowances of the officers of the University, including its professors, teachers,
registrars, librarians and permanent servants.
(4) The tenure of office and terms and manner
of appointment and the duties of the Assessors, Examiners and Examining Board.
(5) The provisions and tenure of fellowships,
scholarships, prizes, rewards, and pecuniary and other aids.
(6) The provision, maintenance, and
supervision of halls, hostels or other premises for the residence of students.
(7) The admission of students as
under-graduates of the University.
(8) To deal with the real and personal
property of the University.
(9) To provide buildings, premises, furniture
and apparatus and other means needed for carrying on the work of the University.
(10) To borrow money for the University and
to mortgage University property if necessary.
(11) To enter into, vary, carry out and
cancel contracts on behalf of the University.
(12) To entertain, adjudicate upon and if
thought fit redress any grievances of the officers of the University, the professors, the
teaching staff, the graduates, under-graduates and the University servants who may feel
aggrieved otherwise than by an act of the Senate. (13) To regulate the Government grants
to the constituent colleges. These three bodies, the Senate, the Syndicate and the
Faculties should be constituted by the Act of Incorporation and together they are enough
to supply all the necessary organs of a great teaching University. But there seems to be a
want for one more body for the new University of Bombay, particularly for the transition
period that is bound to be very long before the mother colleges at the centre of
University education ripen into Universities pending which they must remain affiliated to
one or other of the newly organized teaching Universities in this Presidency. But even if
this problem of making provision for the transition period was not there, the need for a
fourth body in the management of a great teaching University would be felt nonetheless.
The plan of organization I have proposed is
based more or less on the principle of separation of powers. The centre of legislative
power is the Senate. The centre of
executive power is the Syndicate and the centre of academic power is the Faculty. But if
these separate powers are exercised independently and without any co-ordination, the
result is bound to be injurious to the best interest of the University. A Faculty is here
taken as the basis of University organization and is given complete autonomy in
prescribing courses of study and arranging the teaching of and the examining work. But
provision must be made for the control of all matters not expressly assigned to the
Faculties, the settlement of matters affecting more than one Faculty, and for a final
decision when differences arise between one Faculty and another. There is not only a need
for a body for co-ordinating the Faculties but there is also a need for a body for
co-ordinating the Faculties and the Syndicate, otherwise the Syndicate by the exercise of
its executive powers may seriously interfere in the academic freedom of the Faculties. The
control of the purse must ultimately mean the control of all else and it is therefore
necessary to ensure that the Syndicate shall not take any action having a direct
educational bearing on the University as a whole without consultation with a body
representative of the teaching staff as a whole. Thus whether as a feature of the
transition period or as a permanent feature of University organization there is a clear
necessity for the establishment of a fourth body in the act of incorporation. That body I
propose to call the Academic Council. Its functions will be partly advisory and partly
executive.
Its executive functions would include the
determination by regulation or otherwise of all matters relating to
(1) The quorum to be required at meetings of
the Faculties or at meetings of any Committees appointed by the Faculties.
(2) The duties and powers of Advisory and
other Boards, including Boards and Committees to be appointed by the University jointly
with any other University or Body touching any educational matter.
(3) The qualifications for honorary degrees
and distinctions to be awarded by the University and the means and steps to be taken
relative to the granting of the same.
(4) The visitation of affiliated colleges.
(5) The affiliation and disaffiliation of
colleges.
(6) The tenure of fellowships, scholarships,
exhibitions and pecuniary and other aids.
(7) The discipline to be enforced in regard
to the graduates and undergraduates in so far as they come within the jurisdiction of the
University.
(8) The removal from membership of the
University of graduates and under-graduates and the withdrawal of degrees, diplomas,
certificates and distinctions, subject to an appeal to the Senate. The advisory functions
of the Academic Council shall be as follows :
(i) The Syndicate shall not make any decision
in regard to any matter relating to the organisation, improvement, and extension of
University education, both under-graduate and post-graduate without first inviting and
receiving a report thereon from the Academic Council.
(ii) The Syndicate shall not issue general
directions to the Faculties, or review any act of any Faculty or of any Committee or Board
of a Faculty, other than the election of an officer or representative of such body, upon
the appeal of any other Faculty or give directions for their future action without first
inviting and receiving a report thereon from the Academic Council.
(iii) the Syndicate shall not make any appointment to
the teaching staff without first inviting and receiving a report from the Academic
Council.
The composition and strength of the Senate,
the Syndicate and the Academic Council should be the same as proposed by the Calcutta
University Commission for the new Calcutta University. I think it might be better to
change as well the nomenclature and call the Senate, the Court and the Syndicate the State
of the new University. I also propose that the Viceroy should be the Visitor of the
University.
Question
16 : The University of Bombay may have been discharging the functions of (a)
conducting examinations, (b) prescribing course
of study, and (c) appointing text-books very well. But the University never seems to have
paid attention to the pernicious effect of all this on the teacher and the taught. How to
secure freedom for the University teacher to teach as he thinks best and not to restrict
him by a hard and fast syllabus is a problem which should be in the forefront of the
problems to be solved by this Committee. If freedom for the teacher can be obtained then
freedom for the learner will follow. For this purpose the teachers of the University ought
under proper safeguards to have entire control of the education and examination of their
students and the University ought to be so constituted as to make this possible.
Question
17: Besides examination, students' work in colleges ought to be taken into account.
For the higher degrees there should be thesis and oral examinations.
Questions
18 and 19 : The University of Bombay should have the Faculties of Engineering,
Agriculture, Fine Arts, Technology and Music to make it a complete University.
Question
20: The duration of studies for post-graduate degrees should be four years (I am
speaking only for social sciences). There should be two stages of two years each. At the
end of the first stage the candidate should be entitled to the M.A. degree. He should
specialise in one subject only which should be the subject of his major interest. The test
should consist of a written examination accompanied by an essay of some 75 type-written
pages showing his familiarity with the art of using original sources and commenting upon
them. At the end of the second stage the candidate should be entitled to the Ph.D. degree.
There the test would include an oral examination and a thesis of a respectable size fit
for publication. The thesis will embody the investigations of the candidate in a
particular field lying within the scope of the subject he had taken at the M.A. as being
of major interest to him. Beside this the candidate will present himself for an oral
examination in two subjects to be known as subjects of minor interest which will be allied
to the subjects of his major interest. This arrangement will allow specialization with a
broad base.
Question
21: It may be well to have a few such degrees.
Question
22: By means of subventions, studentships and
fellowships.
Question
23; Most essential to have a University press and publication
department. Without this the post-graduate
work will be considerably hampered.
Question
24: See answer to questions Nos. 11-13.
Question
30: Bombay University should confine itself to Bombay. New Universities should open
their own departments. But if the new University is to be composed of colleges, then each
college must confine itself to the teaching of one subject only.
Questions
31-33: See answer to questions Nos. 36-39.
Question
34; Spread of education should be a proper function of the University. But this cannot
be achieved unless the University adopts vernacular as the medium of instruction which in
the present circumstances is a far cry.
Question
35: Government should have no control over the academic affairs of the University
which must be entirely entrusted to the Faculties. But Government should have some control
over the legislative and administrative affairs of the University. This they should have
by means of nominations to the Court and the Senate of the University.
Questions
41-44: I should leave these questions to the newly constituted Faculties. My opinion
is that the curriculum even of the Honours Course provides a poor fare to the students.
Questions
45-46: I hold a very strong affirmative view on the use of vernacular as a medium of
instruction. But I feel that the problem cannot be solved unless Indian public opinion
decides which vernacular it selects for common intercourse.
Question
52: I think special measures are required for
the promotion of University education among the Backward Classes and particularly the
Depressed Classes.
Before closing my replies to the
questionnaire I beg to express my surprise at the absolute disregard the Committee has
shown in the matter of organizing a good Library. I cannot see how any University can
function without a first rate library attached to it.
15th August 1924.
[f1] *Speech delivered by Shri P. J. Roham. He has expressly
stated that the speech was based in all respects on the points drawn by D.r. Ambedkar for
his own speech and that Dr. Ambedkar is the father of this speech. Shri Roham further
states that he was complimented by Dr. Ambedkar for almost reproducing the speech which,
he had contemplated to deliver in the Assembly, but he could not do so owing to his
inability to attend the Assembly on that day, i.e. on 10th November 1938. B.L.A. Debates,
Vol. 4 (Part 3), November 1938, pp. 4024-38.
[f3] *University Reforms CommitteeWritten Evidence No. 103, pp. 1-17, dated 15th August 1924.