THE
EVOLUTION OF PROVINCIAL FINANCE IN BRITISH INDIA
____________________________________________________________________________________________
PART
II
PROVINCIAL
FINANCE : ITS DEVELOPMENT
1877-78
to 1881-82
___________________________________________________________________________
The
scheme of Provincial Budgets, the second stage of which we shall presently study, was
launched not without mixed feelings. Boundless hopes were entertained, though not
unmingled with a sense of misgiving. Just what was expected of the scheme may be correctly
gauged from the remarks of Sir Richard Temple, who, when introducing the scheme in 1870,
said :
"We
hope that this concession (of increased control over revenues and expenditure) will give
the Local Governments an additional interest in the study and the enforcement of economy
in expenditure; will afford them a just inducement to supplement their local receipts from
time to time by methods either most acceptable to the people or least fraught with popular
objection; will cause a more complete understanding to arise between the executive
authorities and the tax-paying classes respecting the development of fiscal resources;
will teach the people to take a practical share in the Provincial Finance, and lead them
up gradually towards a degree of local self-government; and will thus conduce to
administrative as well as financial improvement."[f1]
While
entertaining these hopes he also took the opportunity of asking the Council to be prepared
for disappointment, for he went on to remark:
"the
hopes which I am expressing, however sanguinely, or
confidently entertained, are after all but hopes, and like all other hopes may or may not
be fairly realised. But let all this eventuate as it may, sure I am with certainty free
from shade of doubt, that the measure is advantageous to the Imperial Budget of British
India. For it will have the direct effect of definitely limiting, for the present, the
expenditure from the general Exchequer on certain important branches of civil expenditure,
the very branches indeed, where, from the progressive state of the age, the demands for
increased outlet have most arisen, and in which from the nature of the case the supreme
Central Authority is least able to check the requirements of the local authorities."
The
actual results, however, far surpassed these very moderate hopes and were more than
necessary to dispel the misgivings that still lingered in the minds of those who looked
upon the institution of Provincial Finance as a project of doubtful utility. Confining
ourselves to the issues immediately affecting the Government of India or the Provincial
Governments, it was abundantly proved that Provincial management was more economical than
Imperial management. If we compare the expenditure incurred upon the services while they
were an Imperial charge with the expenditure on them after they were provincialised, the
superior economy of provincial management is overwhelmingly proved.
Year |
Total
excess Expenditure on all Transferred Services except Registration over Total Receipts from them inclusive of all
Contributions other than those for Bengal Famine under Imperial management |
|
Total
excess Expenditure on all Transferred Services except Registration over Total Receipts from them inclusive of all
Contributions other than those for Bengal Famine under Provincial management |
|
£ |
|
£ |
1863-64 |
5,111,297 |
1871-72 |
4,835,238 |
1864-65 |
5,606,248 |
1872-73 |
4,964,407 |
1865-66 |
5,587,779 |
1873-74 |
5,329,180 |
1867-68 |
5,821,438 |
1874-75 |
5,379,509 |
1868-69 |
6,030,214 |
1875-76Est. |
5,135,677 |
1869-70 |
5,856,310 |
|
|
1870-71 |
5,197,250 |
|
|
Complied
from an official volume of Notes on Imperial, Provincial and Local Finance, 1876.
It
was therefore with confirmed belief in its utility and even with a sense of relief that
the Government of India proceeded to incorporate into the Provincial Budgets additional
services local in character or more amenable to local control. But these additions to the
incorporated services made the problem of a supply of funds to Provincial Governments
assume greater proportions. In the first period the gap between the receipts of
incorporated services and the total charges for them was comparatively smaller than what
it was found to be the case on the present occasion. The mode of bridging the gap entirely
by assignments was deemed to be ill-fitted for the success of the scheme in its enlarged
form. The most radical defect in the system of budget by assignment consisted in its
rigidity. The provinces did not favour it as a mode of supply for the reason that while
the outlay on the services under their
management continued to expand the assignments made to them remained fixed in amount. Sir
John Strachey, to whom belonged the credit of carrying the
scheme a stage further, was particularly alive to this weakness of the system. In place of
fixed assignments he desired to give the provinces certain sources of revenue, the yield
of which largely depended upon good management. His primary object in doing this, no
doubt, was to make better and more elastic provision for the growing needs of the
provincialised services. But he had also another, and, as he conceived it, a far more
important reason in the substitution for assignments of assigned revenues. That economy
was the fruit of good management had by that time become a commonplace, but few were sure
as to what good management consisted in. It was Sir John Strachey who, for the first time,
defined in unmistakable language his notion of good management, which was since his time
applied in an ever increasing degree in the development of
Provincial Finance. To him good management of finance was to be had
" not by any action which gentlemen of the Financial
Department or by any other department of the supreme Government can take whilst sitting
hundreds or thousands of miles away in their offices in Calcutta or Simla; not by
examining figures or writing circulars, but by giving to the Local Governments... a direct and, so to speak, a personal interest in
efficient management"[f2]
And
in this he had the strong support of recent experience; for, taking the results of the
past stage the provinces not only managed the services at a lesser cost to the revenue
than was the case under the Imperial regime, but the services yielded increased revenue
under the more immediate and fostering care of the provinces than they did under the
remote, uninformed, and therefore impotent vigilance of the Imperial Government.
Sir
John Strachey had long held to the view that so long as the Provinces collected the
revenues for the Government
of India they did not care to check evasion, which they would have surely done if they had
collected them for their immediate benefit, or, as he put it,
"when
the Local Governments feel that good administration of branches of revenues will give them, and not to the Government of India alone,
increased income and increased means of carrying out the
improvements which they have at heart, then, and not till then, was to be had the good
administration that every one desired."
RECEIPTS
FROM INCORPORATED SERVICES
Allocated
Services |
Under
Imperial Management |
Under
Provincial Management |
||||||||
|
1865-6 |
1867-8 |
1868-9 |
1869-70 |
1870-1 |
1871-2 |
1872-3 |
1873-4 |
1874-5 |
1875-6 |
|
£ |
£ |
£ |
£ |
£ |
£ |
£ |
£ |
£ |
£ |
Jails |
89,260 |
96,910 |
141,218 |
133,806 |
128,773 |
149,888 |
195,755 |
271,915 |
297,198 |
326,023 |
Police |
140,166 |
231,859 |
277,179 |
287,529 |
270,855 |
203,624 |
97,735 |
90,708 |
80,509 |
89,895 |
Education |
53,256 |
66,869 |
67,207 |
72,848 |
60,740 |
76,789 |
80,869 |
101,306 |
99,537 |
101,909 |
Registration |
86,997 |
127,070 |
153,488 |
165,048 |
147,152 |
155,262 |
171,735 |
121,470 |
172,111 |
184,461 |
Printing |
3,333 |
3,282 |
2,803 |
3,718 |
9,244 |
10,923 |
14,383 |
21,174 |
18,220 |
18,066 |
Medical |
|
--- |
|
|
3,273 |
20,594 |
30,649 |
36,370 |
43,097 |
26,583 |
Miscellaneous |
4,070 |
5,666 |
4,076 |
4,489 |
6,116 |
20,991 |
31,345 |
32,396 |
39,666 |
36,234 |
Compiled
from the same source referred to above.
This
evidence of the expanding receipts of provincialised services were therefore a pleasant
surprise which went a great way in confirming the view he had advocated. It was therefore
for a double purpose, of augmenting the revenues and of introducing elasticity in
Provincial Finance, that Sir John Strachey substituted
assigned revenues for assignments as a mode of supply to the provinces.
The
plan adopted by Sir John Strachey was not new, neither was it brought forward for the
first time. It was present in the minds of the people who took part in the discussions of
Provincial Finance in 1870, and was actually advocated by Sir John Strachey as early as
1872. [f3]That
the Government of India did not look upon the plan with favour in 1870 was due to the fact
that it was afraid to permanently alienate the sources of revenue on the growth of which
its stability depended. By now, however, the financial position of the Government of India
had a bit improved, and the six years' trial of provincial management had also engendered
a greater confidence in the scheme in the minds of those who had never completely accepted
the administrative utility of the project. To this was added the prospect of the plan
being a means of increased productivity in their resources as it had been of increased
economy in expenditure. The force of all these factors combined to bring a new stage in
the evolution of Provincial Finance which, because of the distinct mode of supply adopted,
may be well designated as a stage of Budget by Assigned Revenues.
To
be sure, assignments still formed a part of the new system. But that was because of the
difficulty of assigning such revenues the yield of which would have been precisely equal
to the incorporated expenditure. Under any circumstances there was sure to be some
difference. It happened that the normal estimated yield of the ceded revenues fell short
of the requirements and the margin of difference had to be made up by some adjusting
assignment in the case of each province.
The
method of fixing the adjusting assignment for the different Provinces was on the whole a
little too complicated, and may therefore be conveniently explained before proceeding to
examine the constitution of the Provincial Budgets of the different Provinces as laid down
under the second stage of their growth. It must be borne in mind that the total resources
of the Provinces were made up under this system of (1) the receipts accruing from the
incorporated services, (2) the yield of the revenues assigned, and (3) the adjusting
assignment. How to fix upon an adjusting assignment for a particular Province was a
question involving nice calculations. Before arriving at a definite figure for the
adjusting assignments it was obviously necessary to have settled the normal yield of the
receipts of incorporated services and of the revenues made over. The assessment of the
normal yield was a contentious matter. As a rough and ready method the Government of India
took the average yield of each over a series of years as the normal yield, and made it the
basis from which to calculate the assignments. Similarly on the basis of the annual growth
of the revenues in the past years it assumed a certain normal rate of increase for each of
the sources, so that the normal for the succeeding years exceeded the normal for the
preceding year at the normal rate of annual progression assumed. And as the normal yield
of the assigned revenues increased at their assumed normal rate of growth the assignments
fixed for the subsequent years diminished in like proportion. This normal rate of growth assumed for the assigned revenues was
sometimes an assumption unjustified by their past productivity. At all events, as a higher
rate of increase meant lessened assignments, the Provinces questioned its magnitude. To
pacify the Provinces and to make due allowances for errors of estimating, the Government
of India made a very ingenious concession. It agreed that if the actual results showed
deviations from the estimated normal yield, either below or above, they should be equally divided between the provincial and Imperial Governments.
If the actual yield was greater than the normal the adjusting assignment from the Imperial
Government fixed for the year would be reduced by half the excess, and if it were less
than the normal the assignment would be increased by half the deficit.
All
this very delicate mechanism was adopted primarily for the advantageous manner in which it
enabled the Government of India to adjust the assignments without undue hardship being
inflicted on either party. But there was also another advantage which, though unperceived
at the time, was none the less effective. The consent secured from the Provinces to bear
half the burden of a possible deficit in the normal estimate directly put a premium on
economical and judicious administration of the ceded revenues. If the Government of India
had agreed to bear the whole of the deficit below the estimated normal, it is doubtful
whether the Provinces would have exerted themselves sufficiently to develop their
resources to such a degree as to bring their yield to the level of the normal. But the
fear that their obligation to bear half the deficit might assume a larger proportion,
which would undoubtedly be the case if there was a great falling off in the revenue,
compelled them to bestow greater vigilance than they would otherwise have done. Whilst an
effectual check on relaxation was thus provided the scheme was not wanting in a stimulus
to exertion. The prospect of gaining half the excess over the normal gave a more direct
stimulus to the Provinces to develop their resources beyond the normal than would have
been the case if the total excess had been entirely appropriated by the Imperial
Government. In short, the deterrent effect of a deficit to bear and the stimulating effect
of a gain to reap made the mechanism of Provincial Finance as perfect as it could be made
from the standpoint of economy in expenditure and productiveness in resources.
Having
noted the factors that led to the conception and execution of this new step in Provincial
Finance and the features which marked its novelty, we may now proceed to the study of the
constitution of Provincial Budgets and the revenue and charges that were incorporated into
them. Unfortunately it is impossible to present a conspectus of Provincial Budgets as a
whole, for the charges were not uniformly incorporated in all the Provincial Budgets. Each
Province was treated individually. This compels us to enter
upon the analysis of the Provincial Budgets as they were reconstituted in 1877-8
separately for each of the different provinces.
North-Western
Provinces and Oudh[f4]
The
budget of the Province was recast rather than enlarged by additions to the already
allocated items, as was the case with regard to some other Provinces. In its new form the
budget of the Province incorporated the following heads of expenditure and revenue:
Heads
of Charges |
Heads
of Revenue |
3.
Refunds of all Assigned Revenues. |
I.
Land Revenuecollections from the Terai |
4.
Land Revenue (excepting settlements, allowances to district and village officers, and
Bahbar estates and and special temporary compensations to covenanted civil servants in
N.W.P.) |
the Dudi estate in Mirzapore and from stone
quarries. |
6.
Excise 10.
Stamps. |
IV Excise. IX Stamps. |
14.
Administration (excepting Account and and Currency Officers). |
XIII Law and justice. |
16.
Law and Justice (excepting special temporary allowances to covenanted civil servants in
N.W.P.) |
|
17.
Police. 19.
Education |
XIV Police. XVI Education |
21.
Medical (excepting the pay of Medical Officers in charge of civil stations). |
|
22.
Stationery and Printing. |
|
28.
Miscellaneous (excepting remittance of treasure and any unenumerated item exceeding Rs.
10,000). |
XX Miscellaneous (excepting
"Gain by Exchange," "Premium on Bills," unclaimed Bills and
unenumerated items exceeding Rs. 10,000 each). Public Works Receipt such as appertained to
the Public Works charges incorporated into the Provincial Budget |
Public
Works Ordinary: Roads and miscellaneous public improvements, civil buildings (except
opium, post office and telegraph buildings) and tools and plants; also whole of the Public
Works establishment of the P.W.D. excepting that in the Military works and irrigation
branches; the imperial government paying towards their cost 20 per cent on the outlay from
the imperial funds and works and repairs executed by the establishment. |
|
In assigning the heads of revenue the Government of India added the proviso that "the Governments of North-Western Provinces and Oudh must surrender to the Imperial treasury half of any sum by which the net revenue from Excise, Stamps, and Law and Justice (omitting Jails and Registration), deducting Refunds under these heads and the charges under 6, Excise and 10, Stamps, exceeded Rs. 83,75,000 "
and
agreed to reimburse the province with a sum equal to half the deficit if the yield fell
below the above sum. This adjustment was effected by operating upon the balances of the
Province so that if the expenditure of the North-Western Provinces and Oudh upon the
incorporated services exceeded the enumerated revenues plus any Provincial contribution in
support of them by less than Rs. 83,75,000, the difference was to be added to; and if such
excess expenditure was more than Rs. 83,75,000 the difference was to be deducted from the
balances of the Government of the North-western Provinces and Oudh
in the Imperial treasury.
Items
of Expenditure incorporated in the Bengal Budget |
Grant
as existing in 1877-8 |
Retrenchment |
Proposed
Consolidated Grant |
3.
Refunds of Revenue from Excise, Stamps, Law and Justice, and of Deposits. |
4,91,000 |
|
4,91,000 |
4.
Land Revenue (Collectors, Deputy Commissioners, etc. Establishments and charges on account
of Land Revenue Collections). |
22,62,000 |
|
22,62,000 |
6.
Excise on spirits and drugs |
2,92,000 |
|
2,92,000 |
8.
Customs |
6,93,000 |
|
6,93,000 |
9. Salt |
39,000 |
|
39,000 |
11.
Stamps |
2,38,000 |
|
2,38,000 |
15.
Administration (excepting Account Office, Allowances to Presidency Banks, Stationery
Office at Presidency and stationery purchased in the country). |
12,61,000 |
|
12,61,000 |
16.
Minor Departments (excepting meteorological and archaeological departments, census and gazeteers). |
1,68,000 |
|
1,68,000 |
17.
Law and Justice (excepting Law Officers). |
63,97,000 |
1,00,000 |
62,97,000 |
18.
Marine |
10,92,000 |
|
10,92,000 |
7,000 |
|
7,000 |
|
26.
Miscellaneous (excepting remittance of treasure). |
25,000 |
|
25,000 |
Stationery
and Stamps |
4,98,000 |
50,000 |
4,48,000 |
27.
Provincial allotment as now existing |
1,10,59,000 |
4,40,000 |
1,06,19,000 |
Maintenance
of Bishop's Palace, etc. |
7,000 |
|
7,000 |
Total
|
2,45,29,000 |
5,90,000 |
2,39,39,000 |
The
budget of the Province of Bengal [f5]
was enlarged rather than recast by additions to the already
incorporated heads of revenue and expenditure. For the second stage of the scheme the
Government of Bengal was made responsible for the charges shown in the above table.
To
meet these charges the following revenues were handed over to Bengal for its use :
assigned
revenues (ooo
omitted)
|
Esti- |
Estimated
Yield at the assumed
|
||||
|
mated |
Rate
of Growth |
||||
Heads
of Revenue |
Yield |
|
||||
|
in
1876-7 |
1877-78 |
1878-79 |
1879-80 |
1880-81 |
1881-82 |
|
Rs. |
Rs. |
Rs. |
Rs. |
Rs. |
Rs. |
IV
Exercise in spirits and drugs |
6,300 |
6,400 |
6,500 |
6,600 |
6,700 |
6,800 |
VI
Customs (see, Customs Misc. and Warehouses and Wharf
rents). |
3,600 |
3,600 |
3,600 |
3,600 |
3,600 |
3,600 |
VII
Salt (Rents of Ware houses, fines and forfeitures and misc.). |
220 |
220 |
220 |
220 |
220 |
220 |
IX
Stamps } |
10,300 |
10,575 |
10,850 |
11,125 |
11,400 |
11,675 |
XIII
Law and Justice } |
|
|
|
|
|
|
XIV
Marine (pilotage receipts, registration and other fees and misc.). |
1,091 |
1,084 |
1,084 |
1,084 |
1,084 |
1,084 |
XVI
Misc. (all except premium on
bills, unclaimed bills, and any unenumerated item exceeding Rs.
10,000). |
771 |
792 |
792 |
792 |
792 |
792 |
Total |
|
22,671 |
23,076 |
23,421 |
23,596 |
24,171 |
Complied
from statements in the Gazette of India referred
to above.
But
as the revenues assigned were not sufficient for meeting the incorporated charges
transferred, after taking account of the excesses over normal to be paid to the Government
of India, the Government agreed to make the following assignments from the Imperial
treasury to the Government of Bengal :
Year |
Assignments |
|
Rs. |
1877-78 |
48,32,000 |
1878-79 |
44,57,000 |
1879-80 |
40,82,000 |
1880-81 |
37,07,000 |
1881-82 |
33,32,000 |
Central
Provinces[f6]
In
the case of the Central Provinces the following additional items were incorporated in its
budget :
Heads
of Charge |
Grants
as already fixed for 1877-78 |
Retrenchment |
Proposed
Net Consolidated Grants |
|
Rs. |
Rs. |
|
Refunds
of Excise, Stamp, Law and Justice and |
47,000 |
|
47,000 |
Miscellaneous. |
|
|
|
Excise |
52,000 |
|
52,000 |
Stamps |
14,000 |
|
14,000 |
Land
Revenue exclusive of settlement charges |
6,66,000 |
|
|
Administration
(exclusive of Account and Currency Office). |
3,39,000} |
|
|
Minor
Departments (exclusive of Meteorology |
4,000} |
|
|
and
Archaeology). |
|
90,000 |
17,74,000 |
Law
and Justice |
6,91,000} |
|
|
Stationery
and Stamps |
69,000
}. |
|
|
Miscellaneous
(excepting Remittance of |
5,000} |
|
|
Treasure
and Discount on Supply Bills. |
|
|
|
Add |
|
|
|
Existing
allotment for provincial services |
27,73,000 |
|
27,73,000 |
Total
Grant for Services to be borne upon the Central Provinces Budget. |
46,60,000 |
|
45,70,000 |
To
meet these charges the Government of Central Provinces was authorised to appropriate the
yield of the following sources of revenue :
Heads
of Revenue Assigned |
Estimated
Yield in |
Estimated
Yield at the Assumed Rate of Growth in |
||
|
1876-77 |
1877-78 |
1878-79 |
1979-80 |
|
Rs. |
Rs. |
Rs. |
Rs. |
Excise |
13,90,000 |
14,50,000 |
15,10,000 |
15,70,000 |
Stamps |
9,70,000 |
9,75,000 |
9,80,000 |
9,85,000 |
Law
and Justice |
1,67,000 |
1,75,000 |
1,83,000 |
1,91,000 |
Miscellaneous
(excepting Premium on Bills, undrawn Bills of Exchange and any unenumerated items
exceeding Rs. 10,000 each). |
7,000 |
7,000 |
7,000 |
7,000 |
Total
|
|
26,07,000 |
26,80,000 |
27,53,000 |
Compiled
from the Gazette referred to above.
As
these revenues were insufficient the Government of India undertook to supplement them by
the following assignments from the Imperial exchequer:
Year Assignments
Rs.
1877-78 - 19,63,000
1878-79 - 18,90,000
1879-80 - 18,17,000
These
assignments were, however, subject to change because of the proviso applying to the
assigned revenues. By virtue of that proviso the Government of India was to claim half the
net increase of their combined annual yield over the estimated normal and was to bear half
the deficit if their actual combined yield failed short of the normal. If there was an
increase above the normal the assignments were to be reduced by a sum equal to half the
increase, and if there was a decrease the assignments were to be increased by a sum equal
to half the decrease.
Bombay
Coming
to the Provincial Budget [f7]
of the Bombay Government we find the following charges were incorporated in it :
Heads of Charge
|
Grant
as already fixed for 1877-8 |
Retrenchment |
Consolidated
Grant |
|
Rs. |
Rs. |
Rs. |
3.
Refunds |
1,10,0001 |
|
|
4.
Land Revenue |
65,07,000
} |
|
|
6.
Excise |
80,000
|
|
|
7.
Customs |
8,09,000
} |
|
|
8.
Salt |
5,69,000
} |
|
|
14.
Administration |
11,43,0001 |
|
|
15.
Minor Departments |
1,13,000
} |
|
|
16.
Law and Justice |
43,12,000
} |
5,67,000 |
2,13,96,000 |
18.
Marine |
31,000
} |
|
|
20.
Ecclesiastical |
3,25,000
J |
|
|
21.
Medical |
2,68,0001 |
|
|
22.
Stationery and Stamp |
2,29,000
} |
|
|
24.
Allowances and Assignments |
64,81,000
} |
|
|
26.
Superannuation allowances |
8,00,000
}. |
|
|
28.
Miscellaneous |
28,000
J |
|
|
Add |
|
|
|
Existing
allotment for provincial services. |
1,04,54,000 |
|
1,04,54,000 |
Total |
3,24,17,000 |
5,67,000 |
3,18,50,000 |
Besides
the receipts accruing from the already incorporated services the Government of India
assigned to the Government of Bombay the following sources of revenue :
assigned
revenues (ooo
omitted)
|
|
|
||||
Heads
of revenue assigned |
Estimated yield in |
Estimated
Yield at the Assumed Rate of Growth
in |
||||
|
1876-77 |
1877-78 |
1978-79 |
1979-80 |
1880-18 |
1881-82 |
|
Rs. |
Rs. |
Rs. |
Rs. |
Rs. |
Rs. |
1
Land Revenue (receipts of Inamdari
adjustments and service commutations |
5,199 |
6,624 |
6,624 |
6,624 |
6,624 |
6,624 |
IV.
Excise |
3,946 |
4,000 |
4,100 |
4,200 |
4,300 |
4,400 |
Stamps |
4,186 |
4,300 |
4,350 |
4,500 |
4,550 |
4,600 |
Law
and Justice |
277 |
270 |
270 |
270 |
270 |
270 |
Total
|
|
8,570 |
8,720 |
8,970 |
9,120 |
9,270 |
Miscellaneous
(excepting gain by exchange, premium on Bills, and on
Money Orders, lapsed Money Orders, Sales, Proceeds of Durbar Presents and unenumerated itemsexceeding Rs. 10,000 each). |
52 |
70 |
70 |
70 |
70 |
70 |
Total
|
|
15,264 |
15,414 |
15,664 |
15,814 |
15,964 |
Compiled
from the Gazette of India.
The
adjusting assignments to cover the difference between the expenditure and revenue
incorporated in the Bombay Budget were as follows :
Year
Assignments
Rs.
1877-78 - 1,53,20,000
1878-79 - 1,51,70,000
1879-80 - 1,49,20,000
1880-81 - 1,47,70,000
1881-82 - 1,46,20,000
These
assignments, it must be noted, were subject to the same proviso as obtained in the case of
the Central Provinces.
Punjab
The
only remaining Provincial Budget that was framed on the principle of assigned revenues was
that of the Punjab.
The
heads of charge incorporated in this budget were as hereinafter specified
Heads
of Incorporated Expenditure |
Grant
as Settled for 1877-8 |
Retrenchment |
Proposed
Net Consolidated Grant |
|
Rs. |
Rs. |
|
Refunds |
65,0001 |
|
|
Land
Revenue, exclusing settlement charges |
16,21,000
} |
|
|
Excise |
58,000} |
|
|
Stamps
Administration (excluding Account and) |
72,000} |
|
|
Currency
Offices and settlement Secretary |
9,74,000} |
|
|
Minor
Departments |
16,00,000} |
2,24,000 |
51,38,000 |
Law
and Justice |
20,94,000} |
|
|
Superannuation
and Retired Allowances, |
3,38,000] |
|
|
Compasionate Allowances and Gratuities. |
} |
|
|
Miscellaneous,
excluding Remittances of |
41,000J |
|
|
Treasure. |
} |
|
|
Stationery
and Stamps Add |
83,000
} |
|
|
Existing
allotments for provincial services |
54,22,000 |
|
54,22,000 |
Total
|
1,07,84,300 |
2,24,000 |
1,05,60,000 |
To
defray these charges it was proposed to assign the following revenues to the Government of
the Punjab :
Heads
of Revenues Assigned |
Net
Revenue in 1876-7 |
|||
|
|
1877-78 |
1878-79 |
1879-80 |
|
Rs. |
Rs. |
Rs. |
Rs. |
Assessed
Taxes |
|
|
12,00,000 |
12,00,000 |
Stamps |
|
24,85,000 |
25,05,000 |
25,25,000 |
Law
and Justice |
|
4,15,000 |
4,15,000 |
4,15,000 |
Excise
|
|
10,30,000 |
10,50,000 |
10,70,000 |
|
|
39,30,000 |
39,70,000 |
40,10,000 |
Miscellaneous
((excluding gain by Exchange, premium on Bills, and unclaimed
Bills of Exchange). |
|
60,000 |
60,000 |
60,000 |
Total |
|
39,90,000 |
52,30,000 |
52,70,000 |
In
making over these revenues the Government of India had
reserved to itself a share of the improvement in the net
yield from Stamps, Law and Justice, and Excise.
The
estimated net yield having fallen short of the estimated expenditure the Government of
India agreed to make the following assignments to the Government of the Punjab in order to
restore balance in its budget :
|
|
Less
Share of |
|
Year |
Assignment |
Improvement
in Net Revenue from Excise, Stamp, Law and Justice |
Net
Assignment |
|
Rs. |
Rs. |
Rs. |
1877-78 |
107,000 |
||
1878-79 |
53,40,000 |
85,000 |
52,55,000 |
1879-80 |
53,10,000 |
|
53,10,000 |
It
should be noted that the Government of Madras refused to undertake the responsibility of a
provincial Budget based upon the new principle of assigned revenues. It preferred to
remain on the old basis. Provincial Budgets of Assam and Burma are not included in this
chapter. As the principle involved in their constitution appertains to the study
undertaken in the following chapter it is deemed expedient not to include them in the
present.
Before
closing the study of the second stage in the development of Provincial Budgets it is
advisable to take stock of the results achieved during its prevalence from the standpoint
of sufficiency to the Provincial Governments and gain to the Imperial exchequer. The
following is illustrative of the results of this stage from the standpoint of sufficiency to the provinces:
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1877-78 |
1878-79 |
1879-80 |
1880-81 |
1881-82 |
|
£ |
£ |
£ |
£ |
£ |
5,992 |
7,049 |
28,133 |
2,956 |
95,221 |
|
Bengal |
173,380 |
158,932 |
82,523 |
11,313 |
255,189 |
4,469 |
237,100 |
320,729 |
280,790 |
667,613 |
|
Punjab |
18,578 |
48,195 |
7,017 |
59,497 |
135,979 |
Bombay |
609,672 |
61,249 |
11,201 |
37,855 |
418,783 |
Compiled
from the Finance and Revenue Accounts of the Government of India.
From
this it is clear that except in Bombay the funds provided by the Imperial Government
proved not only sufficient for the purpose of carrying on the services incorporated in the
Provincial Budgets, but were such as to afford a safe margin of revenue over expenditure.
That the provinces had enough and to spare is clearly proved by the assistance which they
gave without much detriment to their finances to the Imperial Government in the years
1879-80 and 1880-1. In the year 1879 the financial position
of the Imperial Government had become rather critical. The fall in the value of the rupee
and the commencement of hostilities with the Afghans were expected to bring about a
deficit estimated in 1879-80 at £1,395.000. As the first line of defence the Government
of India urged on the several Local Governments and Administrations the necessity of
reducing the ordinary expenditure of the country within the narrowest possible limits and
directed that measures for suspending or postponing all optional expenditure, whether
Imperial, Provincial, or Local, should be adopted forthwith and that no proposals for
increase of salaries or establishments should be entertained without real necessity.[f8]
As a second line of defence the Government of India ordered that until further
"arrangements
could be settled with the Local Governments... no new work estimated to cost more than Rs. 2,500 shall be commenced at the cost of the Imperial or
Provincial Funds, even though it may already have received the sanction of the
Government"[f9]
and
decided to make large reductions in the expenditure on productive public works. When it
was discovered that these restraints on expenditure were not enough to bring about an
equilibrium in the Imperial Budget the Government of India adopted a plan of levying
benevolences on the provincial balances as a better alternative to increased taxation. It
was, of course, an abrogation of one of the most fundamental conditions of Provincial
Finance that the Provincial Balances, though in possession of the Imperial Government,
were a sacred trust to be released only when required by the provinces. But the solvency
of India was deemed to be more sacred than the sanctity of the terms of Provincial
Finance. Accordingly the following sums were appropriated by the Imperial Government from
the balances of the provincial Governments:
Province |
Contributions
to the Imperial Government |
||
|
1879-80 |
1880-81 |
Total
in Lakhs. |
|
Rs. |
Rs. |
|
10 |
10 |
20 |
|
N.W.P. . Bombay
Punjab
Burma |
7 ½ 4 3 3 |
7
½ 4 3 3 |
15 8 6 6 |
Central
Provinces Madras |
2
1/2 2 |
2
1/2 2 |
5 4 |
Assam
|
1
1/2 |
1
1/2 |
3 |
Total
|
33
1/2 |
33
1/2 |
67 |
These
contributions were repaid in 1882-3; but for the time being they were in effect a gain or
at least a relief to the Imperial treasury. The real gain to the Imperial treasury
consisted in the retrenchments made in assigning allotments for services transferred to
provincial management. The amount of retrechment secured in
the case of each of the provinces may be summarised as follows :
Province |
|
Retrenchment |
|
Rs. |
|
N.W. Provinces |
3,54,000 |
5
percent of the total allotment. |
Oudh |
73,000 |
" |
Bengal |
5,90,000
|
" |
Central
Provinces |
90,000 |
" |
Bombay |
73,000 |
" |
Punjab |
2,41,000 |
" |
This
does not exhaust the total gain reaped by the Imperial Government. Two other ways of gain
must also be mentioned along with this. It should be borne in mind that by taking the
standard yield of the assigned revenues at a level higher than what was justified by their
history, the Government of India was able to assign reduced sums for the provincial
services than what it would have been required to do if the standard yield had been fixed
at a lower level. This reduction in assignments owing to abnormal estimates of the ceded
revenues was a direct gain. The excesses above the standard also opened additional
possibilities of gain owing to the clause governing the cessation of revenues, although it
must be recognised that under the same clause the Government of India stood to lose in the
eventuality of the actual revenue falling below the standard. How much it gained from
these conditional channels of gain it is difficult to say. On the whole, it cannot be
denied that the gain to the Imperial treasury was substantial.
Thus
the results show that the scheme of Provincial Finance on the basis of assigned revenues
was a success both from the standpoint of the Provincial and Imperial Governments, so that
they agreed mutually to make a further move in the development of the scheme which
constitutes its third stage.
1
Annual financial statement for the official years 1860-1 to 1873-4, with Appendices :
Calcutta, Office of the Superintendent of Government Printing, 1873, p. 348.
[f7]1Gazette
of India,
Part I, dated August 4, 1877, p. 468
[f8]1
Resolution of the Financial Department, No. 4063, dated November 9, 1878.
[f9]2 Finance Department Resolution of May 1 1879, Gazette of India, Part I, May 3, 1879, p. 329