Dr. Ambedkar As The Member
of Executive Governor General Council
Questions and Answers
______________________________________________
PART III
81
[f.1]Scheme
for Cheap Grain Shops for Bengal and Bihar Colliery Labour
Mr.
K. C. Neogy : (a) Will the Honourable the Labour Member please state if it is a fact that in a communication to the Governments of Bengal and Bihar, the Labour Department of the Government of India proposed a scheme for the establishment of cheap grain shops in April 1942, for the benefit of colliery Labour ? If so, what response did the scheme meet with at the hands of the two Provincial
Governments and of the organisations of the coal industry ?
(b) Has any effective action been taken by either of the two Provincial Governments
as an alternative to the above scheme for ensuring a cheap supply of food grains to colliery
Labour ? If so, on what lines,
and when ?
(c) What action, if any, has been taken by the organisations of the coal industry or by individual collieries for the supply of cheap food grains
to Labour; and what help,
if any, has been rendered
by either of the two
Provincial Governments to
them in the matter ?
The
Honourable Dr. B. R. Ambedkar : (a) Yes. The Bihar Government
considered that other methods of dealing with the problem were preferable. No reply was received from the Bengal Government.
(b) So far as the Central Government's information goes both
the Provincial Governments
have through their total
officers taken all possible steps to ensure a supply of food grains at cheap rates to colliery Labour.
(c) It is not understood what
the Honourable Member means by cheap food grains. The principal Employers' Organisations in the
coal industry made arrangements to supply food grains at reasonable prices to their
Labour. The Provincial Governments assisted them in
obtaining food grains.
Mr. K. C. Neogy : I am
afraid I have not received a reply to the second part,
clause (b), of my question, viz.,
" Has any effective action been taken by either of
the two Provincial Governments : if so, on what lines and
when ?"
The
Honourable Dr. B. R. Ambedkar
:
As I said, they helped them to secure food supplies.
Mr. K. C. Neogy : But
exactly in what way ?
The Honourable Dr. B. R. Ambedkar: They helped them in getting them.
Mr.
K. C. Neogy : But in what way was that help rendered,
because we have instances in which there was actual hindrance ?
Dr. Sir Zia Uddin Ahmad : What steps have the colliery
owners taken to supply
food to their Labour ?
The
Honourable Dr. B. R. Ambedkar :
As I said, they maintained stocks and were also helped by the provincial Governments
to maintain them.
Mr.
K. C. Neogy : Has the
attention of the Honourable Member been drawn to an
instance in which certain stocks of rice which certain colliery owners acquired for their collieries were
actually commandeered by the Government and a complaint to that effect was made by them to the
Provincial Governments and here ?
The
Honourable Dr. B. R. Ambedkar :
I have no such information.
82
[f.2]The
War Injuries (Compensation Insurance) Bill Presentation of the Report of the Select
Committee
The
Honourable Dr. B. R. Ambedkar
(Labour Member) : Sir, I present
the Report of the Select Committee on the Bill to
impose on employers a liability to pay compensation to workmen sustaining war injuries and to provide for the insurance of employers against such liability.
83
[f.3]
The Indian Boilers (Amendment) Bill
The
Honourable Dr. B. R. Ambedkar
(Labour Member) : Sir, I move
for leave to introduce a Bill further to amend the Indian Boilers Act, 1923.
Mr. President (The Honourable Sir Abdul Rahim): The question is:
" That leave be granted
to introduce a Bill further to amend the Indian Boilers Act, 1923. " The Motion was adopted.
The
Honourable Dr. B. R. Ambedkar :
Sir, I introduce the Bill.
84
[f.4]
The Mines Maternity Benefit (Amendment) Bill
The Honourable Dr. B. R. Ambedkar
(Labour Member) : Sir, I
move for leave to introduce a Bill to amend the Mines Maternity Benefit Act. 1941.
Mr. President (The Honourable Sir Abdul Rahim): The question is:
" That leave be granted to introduce a Bill to amend the
Mines Maternity Benefit Act, 1941." The motion was adopted.
The
Honourable Dr. B. R. Ambedkar :
Sir, I introduce the Bill.
85
[f.5]The
Motor Vehicles (Drivers) Amendment Bill
The
Honourable Dr. B. R. Ambedkar
(Labour Member) : Sir, I
move for leave to introduce a Bill to amend the Motor
Vehicles (Drivers) Ordinance, 1942.
Mr. President (The Honourable Sir Abdul Rahim):
The question is:
" That leave be granted to introduce a Bill to amend the
Motor Vehicles (Drivers) Ordinance, 1942." The motion was adopted.
The
Honourable Dr. B. R. Ambedkar :
Sir, I introduce the Bill.
86
[f.6]
Unsatisfactory Arrangements for Accommodation of Assembly at Simla
61.
Mr. Amarendra Nath Chattopadhyaya: (a) Will the
Honourable the Labour Member be pleased to state if it is
not the duty of the Estate Officer, Central Public Works Department, to arrange for the
accommodation of the Member of the Assembly when they are
wanted temporarily at Simla for attending Committee meetings ?
(b) Is it not their duty to see
that the Members are not put to any inconvenience on
account of light or bad arrangements for accommodation ?
(c) Is the Honourable Member
aware of the fact that the
Cart Road quarters which were
set apart for the Assembly Members viz., 2, 3 and 11
during the Hindu Law Committee Sittings were more
inconveniently arranged in comparison with No. 20 ? Is the Honourable Member prepared to enquire into the matter of selecting these quarters for the Assembly Members by
the Estate Officer during
Committee meetings in May
and June ?
(d) Will the Honourable Member consider changes in the
arrangements in these quarters
after proper enquiries ?
The
Honourable Dr. B. R. Ambedkar
:
(a) The Estate Officer's duty is to allot such
accommodation to the Members of the Central Legislature as
is specified by Government in consultation with the House
Committee.
(b)
All the quarters are planned so as to avoid, as far as
possible, any inconvenience to Members.
(c)
The quarters on the Cart Road were built according to approved plans. Quarters Nos. 2 and 3 are on the
highest level and were reserved
for the Members in
consultation with the House
Committee of the Legislature, as they were considered to be very conveniently situated. The arrangement of the rooms in Nos. 2 and 3 differs slightly from that
of the rooms in No. 20. Some Members consider a particular
arrangement of the rooms in a house convenient irrespective of the level of the
house, while others may
prefer quarters at a
higher level irrespective of the arrangement of the rooms. It cannot therefore, be said that quarters Nos. 2 and 3 are more inconveniently arranged than No.
20. No. 11 was not occupied by any Member of the Legislature, as it was exchanged
for No. 20. In the circumstances
explained, no special enquiry is called for.
(d) As already stated, the
quarters for the Members
of the Legislature were reserved in consultation with
the House Committee of the Legislature. No changes seem
necessary unless the House Committee expresses a desire for them.
Sir
Muhammad Yamin Khan :
May I ask if the Members who attended the Sub-Committee meetings in Simla were asked to deposit a sum of Rs. 75 as security before they could get electricity
and water ?
The
Honourable Dr. B. R. Ambedkar : I
must have notice of that question.
Sir
Muhammad Yamin Khan: Does the Honourable Member know that Members have been asked to
deposit money here in
Delhi ?
The
Honourable Dr. B. R. Ambedkar : I
have no idea.
Mr.
Lalchand Navalrai : May I ask if there is any officer
appointed to go round these quarters and look to the comforts
of the Members ?
The
Honourable Dr. B. R. Ambedkar: I have no idea.
Mr.
Lalchand Navalrai: Will the Honourable Member then appoint some officer?
The
Honourable Dr. B. R. Ambedkar : I
will make inquiries in the matter.
Dr.
P. N. Banerjea :
How many meetings of the
House Committee are held during every Session ?
The
Honourable Dr. B. R. Ambedkar:
It is for the House Committee to decide how many times they should meet.
Dr.
P. N. Banerjea :
Have you any information on the subject ?
The
Honourable Dr. B. R. Ambedkar : I
remember there was a meeting of the
House Committee during the last Session.
Mr. Lalchand Navalrai :
May I know if some of the Members of the House Committee
have died and have they been replaced by some other Members?
The
Honourable Dr. B.R. Ambedkar :
I
am very sorry to hear the
news but I am sure the house will take such steps as are necessary to fill the vacancy.
87
[f.7]Provision
of a Rickshaw Stand at the Cart Road Quarters, Simla
62. Mr. Amarendra Nath Chattopadhyaya : Will the Honourable Member for Labour be pleased to state
if Cart Road quarters in Simla are kept for occupation by
the Members of the Central Legislature ? If so, does he propose to ask the
Municipal Committee of Simla (i) to set up a Rickshaw Adda
near about the quarters for the convenience of the Members ; and (ii) not to charge security deposit for temporary occupation
of the quarters by the Assembly
Members for electric light ?
The
Honourable Dr. B. R. Ambedkar :
As the Members occupy a very limited number of quarters on
the Cart Road for short periods at a time, Government do not feel justified
in approaching the Simla Municipal Committee for the
provision of a rickshaw stand in the totality. The supply
of electric energy in Simla is the concern
of the Simla Municipal Committee and Government regret they are unable to interfere
with the Municipal arrangements
in this respect.
88
[f.8]
Water Supply in New Delhi and Delhi
66.
Mr. Lalchand Navalrai ; (a)
Will the Honourable the Labour Member be pleased to state
the arrangements that have been made for the supply of sufficient water for all purposes in New Delhi and Delhi itself to remove the inconvenience caused by the scarcity of water in these very hot days ?
(b) Is it a fact that the Jumna
river bed was being straightened to get water to the pumps ? If so, how far has that scheme progressed, and will the water brought therefrom be sufficient for all
purposes in both Delhi and New Delhi ?
(c) What arrangements are proposed
to be made to cool the water which in these summer days gets too hot in the pipes ?
The
Honourable Dr. B. R. Ambedkar :
(a) In order to improve the supply of filtered water, five additional filters were installed this summer, and two
large pumping sets have been ordered from England and are
expected in India in October. The scarcity of unfiltered water was due to a sudden
fall in the level of the Jumna. In order to raise the level of the water, a series of bunds was put up across the channel. The
situation has since improved and there is now no shortage.
(b) Experiments for training
the river so as to divert its dry weather channel along the right bank, on which the pumping station is situated, are being conducted at the Central Hydro-dynamic Research Station, Poona. A committee of experts
recently appointed to investigate the matter have
submitted their report which is being examined.
(c) No arrangements
for cooling the water are feasible.
Mr. Lalchand Navalrai : Why is it not feasible ? Is it because it is too cold
here?
The
Honourable Dr. B. R. Ambedkar : The Honourable Member is entitled
to draw his own conclusions.
Mr.
Lalchand Navalrai : Is it unusually cold here ?
The
Honourable Dr. B. R. Ambedkar: I leave my Honourable
friend to draw his own conclusions.
Pandit
Lakshmi Kanta Maitra :
Why don't you utilise the Defence of India Act for this purpose.
89
[f.9]
Muslim
Assistant Estate Officers in Central Public Works Department
71.
Mr. Nabi Baksh Illahi Baksh Bhutto : (a) Will the Honourable Member for Labour be pleased to state the number of Assistant Estate Officers in the Central Public Works Department ? (b) How many of
them are Musalmans ? (c) Is the ratio of Muslims
maintained ?
The
Honourable Dr. B. R. Ambedkar :
(a) Four; one post being vacant at present.
(b)
None.
(c)
Not at present, but the ratio of Muslims will soon be adjusted
as the Federal Public
Service Commission has been asked to recruit a Muslim for the Vacant post.
90
[f.10]Construction
of New Buildings at Ghaziabad
72. Sardar Sant Singh: (a) Will
the Honourable Member for Labour be pleased to state if his attention has been drawn to the leading article in Dawn of the 29th June, 1943, under the caption " Thick Waste "? If so, what is the reason for building these houses at Ghaziabad and
not near about New Delhi?
(b)
Is it a fact that, these
houses will be temporary
constructions for the period of war ? If so, is he aware that accommodation
for the Gazetted personnel of the Government of India
is inadequate in New Delhi? If so, why do not Government propose to construct houses
which may be of use to the Gazetted staff after the war ?
(c)
What use will Government make of the houses at Ghaziabad if these are
not required by the Defence Department after the war ?
The
Honourable Dr. B. R. Ambedkar
:
(a) Yes. But the facts stated in the article are not entirely correct.
(b)
and (c). The matter is under
consideration, and no definite
decision has been reached.
91
[f.11]
Scheme of Sickness Insurance for Industrial Workers
127. Mr. Nabi Baksh Illahi Baksh Bhutto : (a) Will the Honourable Member
for Labour be pleased to slate if the Scheme of Sickness Insurance for Industrial Workers has been completed ?
(b)
When is the Scheme expected to come into operation ?
(c) Does the Honourable Member propose to lay on the
table a copy of the Scheme ?
(d) Is it also proposed to
lay on the table the opinions expressed by Provincial Governments on the Scheme ?
The
Honourable Dr. B. R. Ambedkar :
(a) No.
(b) The Government of India have appointed a Special Officer to prepare a draft scheme of Sickness Insurance for
workers in selected industries. The scheme is now under preparation but it is not possible at
this stage to say when it will come into operation.
(c)
and (d) These points will be considered later on. Legislation will be necessary, and the House will of
course be fully informed of the details of the scheme.
Mr. Lalchand Navalrai :
How far has the scheme been completed ?
The
Honourable Dr. B. R. Ambedkar : A preliminary report has been
received.
Mr.
Lalchand Navalrai : When approximately is this going to be completed
?
The
Honourable Dr. B. R. Ambedkar : I
cannot say anything about it.
Mr. Lalchand
Navalrai : Say
two years or one year ?
The
Honourable Dr. B. R. Ambedkar : Within two months' time.
Mr. Lalchand
Navalrai :
Thank you.
92
[f.12]
Fixing Rents Lower than Pre-war Rental Value in Babar Road
Area
132.
Sardar Sant Singh: (a) Is the Honourable the Labour Member aware:
(i) that rents for middle class tenement houses in the Babar Road Area
have been fixed by the Rent Controller at Rs. 42-8-0 per mensem from the 1st July, 1942 ;
and
(ii) that this rent is less
than the rental value of
Rs. 560 per annum assessed
by the New Delhi Municipal
Committee for levying house-tax on these houses ever since 1938-39 ?
(b)
What are the grounds for fixing the rents lower than the pre-war rental value as assessed by the New Delhi Municipal Committee in
1938-39 ?
(c) How do Government justify
the levy of house-tax at
an excessive rate for all these years ?
(d) If the assessment was not excessive, how do Government justify the order of the Rent Controller ?
(e) Is he aware that the house-owners in this area are mostly
middle class people who have been hit hard by this arbitrary decision
of the Rent Controller ?
(f) What rents are fixed by
the Rent Controller for houses having approximately a similar residential accommodation near the
Pusa Road in Qarol bagh Area, and in any other composite area in New Delhi ?
(g) Is he aware that while controlling rents of houses in Calcutta, the Bengal Government have allowed an increase of ten per cent. in rents over
the rents prevailing in 1941 ?
(h) Does he propose to allow
a similar increase in rents in New Delhi ? If not, why ?
The
Honourable Dr. B. R. Ambedkar
:
(a) (i). There are several different classes of tenements in the Babar Road Area carrying
different rents. The rent of Rs.
42-8-0 is for one class tenements only. (ii) Yes.
(b)
The rents are fixed under clause 8 of the Delhi House Rent
Control Order, 1939, under which the Rent Controller has to fix
the fair rent of a house having regard to the prevailing rates of rents
for the same or similar accommodation in similar circumstances
during the twelve months prior to the 1st September, 1939. (c) This is not a matter
for Government.
(c) In
view of the reply to part (b) above, the question
does not arise.
(e)
Yes, but Government have no reason to believe that
the house-owners have been hit hard.
(f)
There are no houses in Qarol bagh having the same or similar accommodation.
(g) I
have no official information on the point.
(h)
No, Government do not see any justification for it.
Sardar
Sant Singh : Will the Honourable Member
make inquiries as to the difference in rental value assessed by the New Delhi Municipal Committee and the rent which is allowed to the
owner and see that some justice is done to the landlords and the rents are increased ?
The
Honourable Dr. B. R. Ambedkar : I
cannot do that, because the fair rent is fixed by the officer. There is no reason to
suppose that his judgement is in any way miscarried by any circumstances which he ought
not to take into account.
93
[f.13]Prohibition
of Constructions Involving Use of Cement, Steel and Timber
135.
Sir Abdul Halim Ghuznavi : (a)
In view of the Government order announced in some places by beat of drums prohibiting
constructions of all descriptions involving the use of cement, steel and timber, will the
Honourable Member for Labour be pleased to state whether
this order applies to constructions which are nearing completion and do not require
cement, steel and teak wood ?
(b) If the answer to (a) is in the negative, will the owners
of such premises be granted permission for making and fitting the requisite panels for
doors and wood-sashes for windows out of mango wood and other materials already in their possession, provided that the
authorities are satisfied after verification that all the materials required are already
in their stock ?
(c) If the answer to (b) is
in the affirmative, do Government propose to issue instructions to that effect to all provinces ? If
not, will all constructions, irrespective of whether they
involve the use of cement, steel and timber, be kept in abeyance now ?
The
Honourable Dr. B. R. Ambedkar
: (a) to (c) In order to curtail the demand for Labour and
materials and to check inflationary tendencies, the Government of India have asked the Provincial Governments to do what
they can to discourage the construction of buildings, etc., by total bodies and private
persons. These are general instructions and the Provincial Governments are at liberty to
give effect to them in whatever manner they consider suitable having regard to the
conditions prevailing in the Province. I would therefore suggest
that the Member approaches the Provincial Government whose
orders he desires to have
clarified.
Mr. Lalchand Navalrai :
May I know if these things have been prohibited because they are being supplied for war purposes or they have been prohibited for some other reason ?
The
Honourable Dr. B. R. Ambedkar
: For war purposes.
Sir
Abdul Halim Ghuznavi : May I inform the Honourable Member that the District Magistrate of Mathra has refused permission
to an Honourable Member of this House to complete his house. He wanted to put in only 22 panels of mango and 22 panels for doors.
That was the only thing to be done, but the District
Magistrate refused to give the permission.
Mr.
Chairman (Syed Ghulam Bhik Nairang) : That is a statement of facts and not a question.
The
Honourable Dr. B. R. Ambedkar :
I am glad to receive the information.
Sir
Abdul Halim Ghuznavi
: Is it a fact that the Commissioner of Agra Division was approached in this connection and he said that if the gentleman
concerned could convince the District Magistrate that he
already had in his possession the necessary wood to complete the house, he would give him
the sanction. He convinced the District Magistrate that he
had the necessary wood in
his possession and yet he refused
to give him the permission.
Mr.
Chairman (Syed Ghulam Bhik Nairang): Again it is a
statement and not a question.
Mr.
Lalchand Navalrai : May I know if the half-completed house or three-fourths completed houses have also been prohibited from being built?
The
Honourable Dr. B. R. Ambedkar :
I
have no information on the point.
Mr.
Lalchand Navalrai: Have any exceptions been
made in this matter?
The
Honourable Dr. B. R. Ambedkar:
We have given general instructions to the provinces.
Mr.
Lalchand Navalrai :
They have not been given any discretion ?
The
Honourable Dr. B. R. Ambedkar
: I am sure the discretion will be exercised with due care.
Mr.
Lalchand Navalrai : Then the Central Government has not given any instructions yet ?
The
Honourable Dr. B. R. Ambedkar :
I cannot say at this stage.
94
[f.14]
Cost of Raising Buildings in New Delhi and Simla Connected with War Activities
144.
Sardar Sant Singh: Will the Honourable the Labour Member please state
the total cost incurred by the Government of India in
raising buildings in New Delhi
and Simla, separately, connected with the War activities
since September 1939 ? Was any expense
incurred on behalf of Americans
? If so, how much, and who met it ?
The
Honourable Dr. B. R. Ambedkar :
The following expenditure
had been incurred up to the end of March 1943 : (i) New
DelhiRs.
1,55,14,629. (ii) SimlaRs. 24,65,137. (iii) On behalf of AmericansRs. 38,47,916. (This has been debited to Defence Services Estimates under Reciprocal Lease/Lend arrangements.)
Maulana Zafar Ali Khan : May I
know if after the war all these
temporary buildings will be
demolished ?
The
Honourable Dr. B. R. Ambedkar: Yes.
Sardar
Sant Singh
: Which Government meets
the expenditure of Rs.38,47,916 on Americans ?
The
Honourable Dr. B. R. Ambedkar :
The government of India under
the reciprocal Lease/Lend arrangements.
Sardar Sant
Singh : Will this expenditure on the tax-payers of India be
later on debited to the accounts ?
The
Honourable Dr. B. R. Ambedkar: Notice.
95
[f.15]
Factories Adversely Affected by the Former Standard Time
[f.16]151. Qazi Muhammad Ahmad Kazmi : (a) Will the Honourable the Labour Member please state
which factories (and in which part of the country) were adversely affected by the former
standard time which used to be observed in India ?
(b) What is the number of such factories, and what is the
estimated amount of toss to those factories caused by the keeping up of the standard time ?
(c) Do Government propose to
consider the advisability of restoring the old standard
time ? If so, why not ?
The
Honourable Dr. B. R. Ambedkar
: (a) Government have no information that factories in any
part of India were adversely affected by the former standard time.
(b)
Does not arise.
(c)
The reply to the first part is in the negative. The
reasons for the advance of time have been explained by Government in a Press communique a
copy of which is laid on the table of the House. No grounds have been shown for a
restoration of the old standard time.
Press
Communique
The
existence of two different standards of time in India is for purposes of defence undesirable and since the 15th May this year a uniform standard
time has been observed throughout the country. In deciding
what that standard should be the Government have had to
consider on the one hand the convenience of that portion of India which lies to the West
of meridian 82 1/2 and already enjoys sufficient daylight saving and on the other the
requirements of the eastern Provinces where it is
essential to avoid any electricity overload due to overlap of factory demands with those
of domestic, office and street lighting and where extra daylight may be needed to mitigate
the effect of obstruction. Since in the summer months there is an adequate margin of
daylight in the eastern areas, it was considered that by
an adjustment of office and factory hours the requirements
of those areas during the summer could be adequately met if Standard Time were fixed at 5
1/2 hours ahead of Greenwich Mean Time throughout India and a uniform time was introduced
accordingly as from the 15th May. The Government of India undertook, however, to consider
the question of a further change before the winter season
commenced. It has now been decided that to insure the continuance of sufficient daylight in the eastern
Provinces it is necessary to make such a change in the near future, and that Indian
Standard Time throughout the country should be 6 1/2 hours
ahead of Greenwich Mean Time. The change will take effect from midnight or the 31st August1st September
from which date clocks will be advanced by one hour. It is fully realised that the advance
of clocks by one hour must inevitably cause some inconvenience
to areas lying west of meridian 82 1/2 but it is believed that by an adjustment of hours of work, this
inconvenience can be overcome and that when the public becomes accustomed to the new time no great difficulty will be experienced.
96
[f.17]
Fall in Output of Coal
28.
Mr. K. C. Neogy : (a)
Will the Honourable Member for Labour please state if it is a fact that since January,
1943, the output of coal in British India has gone down ?
If so, did Government make any enquiry about the reason for this fall in output, and what
practical steps do Government propose to take to improve the situation ?
(b) Is it a fact that the stock of coal was much less at
collieries in British India on the 31st of May, 1943, than the stock that was reported to
exist on the 31st of December, 1942 ? If so, what are the reasons for such a deterioration ?
(c)Is
it a fact that sufficient number of wagons was riot available between the 1st January,
1943, and 31st of May, 1943, even to carry away the raisings
of that particular period ? If so, what is the explanation
for the reduction in the
stock ?
(d) Is it a fact that about 30 collieries in the Kajora field in the Province
of Bengal with a raising of approximately over ten lakhs of tons a year, are going to be shut down for want
of wagon facilities due to the military authorities using
the portion of the line serving these collieries, although it is possible to carry the military goods from the Ondal
Junction by the military lorries ?
The
Honourable Dr. B. R. Ambedkar :
(a) No. The second part of the question does not arise.
(b) The stock figures reported to exist on the 31st December, 1942, are not
reliable. Improved methods
of collecting figures of
stocks have since been introduced.
It is believed that stocks
have not deteriorated but increased between 31st December, 1942, and 31st May, 1943.
(c) Answer to the first part is in the affirmative. Answer to
the second part is in the negative.
(d)
No. Kajora field is worked by several pilots. It is presumed
that the question refers particularly to the area worked by Okhra Nos. I and 2 Pilots.
Approximately 30 collieries
are worked by these two Pilots. The capacity for coal of these
two Pilots is 100 wagons which represents approximately
2,000 tons of coal per day or 7,20,000 tons per annum. Both these Pilots
have been getting preferential supplies of wagons as they
have large orders from B
and A Railway. With the wagon position as at present prevailing in the Bengal and Bihar
fields, it is extremely unlikely that even if the capacities of these Pilots were increased the collieries would get
more than 100 wagons a day. For the Military Depot 20 wagons in the capacity of Okhra No.
2 Pilots have been provided,
but as explained above this arrangement is not likely to cause these collieries to shut down. The Government of India are not
aware whether the military can carry goods from Ondal Junction by
military lorries.
97
[f.18]
Concessions re Oil Resources in British India to
British or American Firms
30.
Mr. K. C.
Neogy : Will the Honourable Member for
Labour be pleased to refer to starred question No. 441, dated the 30th March, 1943, and lay
on the table a statement
giving the names of
British or American firms that may have secured
concessions (including exploration or prospecting licences) in respect of the potential
oil sources in any part of British India, together with a summary of the principal terms
and conditions thereof in each case ?
The
Honourable Dr. B. R. Ambedkar:
The attention of the Honourable Member is invited to the
statement placed on the table of the House today giving
the information promised in answer to the supplementary on question No. 441, dated the
30th March, 1943.
98
[f.19]
Summary of Proceedings of the Third Meeting of the Standing Labour Committee
The
Honourable Dr. B. R. Ambedkar
(Labour Member) : Sir, I
lay on the table a copy[f.20]
of the Summary of Proceedings of the third meeting of the Standing Labour Committee held
on the 7th and 8th May, 1943.
99
[f.21]
Sikhs in High Salaried Posts in the Central Public Works Department
209.
Sardar Sant Singh: Will the Honourable Member for
Labour please state the
number of posts carrying salaries of Rs. 400 per mensem or over in the Central Public Works Department
and in Sections other than the
Central Public Works Department
? How many of these posts are held
by Sikhs ?
The
Honourable Dr. B. R. Ambedkar: There are 60 posts on salaries
rising to Rs. 400 or more and 82 posts on salaries of Rs.
400 and upwards. Of the total of 142 posts, 6 are held by Sikhs.
It
is not understood to which office the Member refers by the
words ' Sections other than the Central Public Works Department.
100
[f.22]
Establishment Branch of the Office of the Chief Engineer, Central Public Works Department
[f.23]210.
Sardar Sant Singh : (a) Will the Honourable the Labour Member kindly state if
it is a fact that a separate Branch to deal with establishment matters and to facilitate
the work of selection board in the office or the Chief
Engineer, Central Public Works Department, was set up recently ?
(b) What is the total number
of staff working in this Branch, and how many of them are Hindus, Muslims and Sikhs ?
(c) Is it a fact that none of the members of the staff including
the Superintendent has any experience of establishment matters ?
(d) Why were not experienced
people already working in the Establishment Branch considered suitable for employment in this Branch ?
(e) Is it a fact that establishment matters of the Muslim
personnel are dealt with quickly while those of other communities lie unattended
to for an indefinite period ?
(f) Do Government propose to investigate an
enquiry into the communal work done by this Branch?
The
Honourable Dr. B. R. Ambedkar:
(a) Yes.
(b)
Total No. of staff 12
Hindus |
5 |
Muslims
|
6 |
Sikhs
|
Nil |
Indian
ChristiansI |
1 |
(c)
No ; two assistants and three
clerks were taken from the
Establishment
Branches.
(d)
More staff could not be removed from the Establishment
Branches without detriment
to the work there.
(d) No.
(f)
No.
101
[f.24]
Representations Against the Appointment of One Bakshi Madan Singh in the Central
Public Works Department
[f.25]211.
Sardar Sant Singh: (a) Will the Honourable the Labour Member
please state if it is a fact that one Bakshi Madan Singh was appointed as an Assistant in
the Works Section, Central Public Works Department,
against a vacancy reserved for ' other minorities ' ?
(b) Was he asked at the time of recruitment to produce a
certificate as to the bonafides
of his being a Sikh in accordance with the procedure laid
down by the Home Department ? If not, why not ?
(c) Are Government aware that Bakshi Madan Singh has been
" Petit " 3 or 4 times before he joined service, and that he kept hair to deceive the Government to get a job reserved for the
Sikh Community ?
(d) Is it a fact that a number
of representations were made to the Additional Chief
Engineer and the administrative Officer by the total Sikh
organisations and none of these
has even been acknowledged so far?
(e) Do Government propose to replace this person by a bonafide Sikh?
The
Honourable Dr. B. R. Ambedkar:
(a) Yes.
(b)
No. The Department had no
doubts as to his bonafide at the time of his appointment.
(c) No.
Government had no information to this effect.
(d)
Yes. They are being
acknowledged.
(e)
Only, if it is established that he embraced Sikhism within a year of his application for employment, or being a Keshdhari had
become palit before his employment.
102
[f.26]Commercial
Aspects of Indian Spring-Waters
50. Mr. K. C. Neogy : Will the Honourable Member for
Labour be pleased to refer to the unstirred question No.
92, dated the 30th March 1943, and make a statement:
(a)
explaining whether the
commercial aspects of the
Indian spring-waters referred
to therein have been examined, and whether the arrangements to bottle the waters for trial have been completed ; and
(b) indicating the location of the
different springs which have so far been tried and found
satisfactory ?
The
Honourable Dr. B. R. Ambedkar:
(a) The commercial aspects of Indian spring-waters are still under
examination. The arrangements
to bottle the waters for trial are complete.
(b)
The springs occur on private land, as negotiations are still in progress with the proprietor of the land. Government do not consider it desirable to disclose the location of the springs at this stage.
103
[f.27]
Survey of Hydro-Electric
Possibilities in India
274. Mr. T. T. Krishnamachari (on
behalf of Mr. R. R. Gupta) :(a) Will the Honourable member for Labour be pleased to state if Government have directed a survey of Hydro-electric possibilities in this country ? If so, when was the survey last carried out, and by
whom ?
(b)
Do not Government consider that,
in view of the generally accepted policy of conservation of
India's better class coal resources,
hydro-electric developments should be actively
encouraged, particularly in the United Provinces, the Punjab and the Central
Indian States, which are situated away from the sources of India's coal
supply ? If so, in what form do Government propose to encourage such development ?
(c)
What is the installed generating
capacity of the State Hydroelectric schemes developed by the United Provinces
and the Punjab Governments,
Native States like Mysore and Travancore,
and the Tatas in Bombay, and what is the unabsorbed load available
from these schemes at present?
(d) Does the Honourable Member propose to lay on the
table a statement showing from their latest data the possible head works site of the new hydro-electric schemes in India, together with the power likely to be obtained from each of the generation schemes ?
(e) Have Government thought
out any possibility of converting Railways to be driven electrically in those totalities where cheap power can be obtained ?
The
Honourable Dr. B. R. Ambedkar :
(a) A brief survey of major hydro-electric possibilities
throughout India was made about the end of 1941 by the Electrical Commissioner with the Government
of India ;
(b) Promotion of hydro-electric schemes is primarily the concern of Provincial Governments and States. The
Central Government is, however, fully alive to the desirability
of hydro-electric development and the post-war organisation of the electricity supply industry including hydro-electric development is engaging the attention of the Reconstruction Committee of Council.
(c)
and (d) During war-time it is not in the public interest to publish the
information asked for. In any case, as already stated, the promotion of
hydro-electric schemes is primarily the concern of the Provincial
Government and States.
(e)
Yes, the question has been
considered from time to time and is always kept
in view, but the availability or cheap power is only one
of the factors which would determine the conversion of a particular section to electric traction.
104
[f.28]
Inclusion of certain Details in the Working of the Payment of Wages Act
289.
Mr. Muhammad Azhar
Ali: (a) Will the Honourable Member for Labour please state if it is a fact that the Report on the working of the Payment
of Wages Act on Railways does not indicate the particulars
of the applications presented
to and disposed of by the authorities appointed under the
Payment of Wages Act ?
(b) If the reply to part (a) be
in the affirmative, does he propose to take steps for the inclusion of the particulars of
the applications with a review thereon in the next reports ?
If not, why not ?
The
Honourable Dr. B. R. Ambedkar
:
(a) At present what the
Honourable Member
suggests is a fact.
(b)
I shall consider the suggestion.
105
[f.29]
Sulphur Mined in Baluchistan and Firms Supplied with
Sulphuric Acid Manufacturing Plants
290.
Mr. T. T. Krishnamachari (On behalf of Mr. R. R. Gupta) : (a) Will the
Honourable the Labour Member be pleased to state the
quantity of sulphur mined in Baluchistan by the
Utilisation Branch of the Geological Survey of India, and the total amount so far spent in
such mining operations ?
(b)
Is it a fact that the deposit of sulphur in the present site of mining in Baluchistan, available for
further exploration, is small ?
In any case, what is the estimated tonnage of the unworked deposit at the moment?
(c) Is it a fact that the Department of Supply has notified
the sugar mill concerns in India that no supply of sulphur
can be arranged for the mills in connection with the next crushing season ? If so, what is the reason for such a notice being given to the sugar mills ?
If no such notice has been given, how were supplies of
sulphur secured for the sugar mills in the last two crushing seasons, and how is it proposed to
arrange the supply during the next
?
(d) Is it a fact that a large quantity of sulphur-dioxide (SO2
) gas is wasted as a
by-product in connection with the operation of copper
smelling furnace in India ? If so, is it a fact that such
gaseous waste can be easily
converted into sulphuric
acid ? Did Government examine the possibility
or such a source of supply of sulphuric acid, and, if so,
with what result ?
(e)
Is it a fact that since the outbreak of the war, the Department of Supply imported a number of sulphuric acid manufacturing plants ? If so, what is the number of such plants, and how have
they been disposed of ? Do
Government propose to lay
on the table a statement
showing the firms to whom such plants, if any, have been
made available, and the special
reason for which the plants were
supplied to them in each case ?
The
Honourable Dr. B. R. Ambedkar :
(a) It is not in the public interest to state the quantity of
sulphur mined. The total
amount so far spent on Baluchistan Sulphur Operations is Rs. 11,85,000.
(b) No. It is not in the
public interest to
disclose the estimated
tonnage of unworked deposits.
(c)
No. Supplies of sulphur for the
sugar industry during the
last crushing season were met partly from American imports and partly by depletion of reserve stocks. Sugar mills are
being supplied with
Baluchistan sulphur ore which they will refine individually
or alternatively have refined at a central plant set up with Government sanction and the resultant pure sulphur will be used in the sugar mills
during the crushing season.
Any deficit on estimated requirements will be met from American imports
arranged by the Supply
Department.
(d) Sulphur dioxide is produced as a by-product during the smelting
of copper in India. It occurs in the flue gases in a highly
diluted form with other gases and its efficient conversion into sulphuric acid is
difficult. The possibility of using this source
of supply for production of sulphuric acid and sulphur was examined
very early in the war but was not proceeded with as the processes called for the import of complicated and expensive machinery with technical
personnel and even then successful recovery was
problematic.
(e)
No. Full information regarding
the proposed import of plants from America was given by the Honourable the Supply Member in answer to unstarted question No. 47 on
4th August 1943.
106
[f.30]
Lead Mine in Jawar in Udaipur
State
291.
Mr. T. T. Krishnamachari (on behalf of Mr. R.
R. Gupta) : (a) Will the Honourable the
Labour Member please state if it is a fact that a lead mine is being worked in Jawar in the Udaipur State by the
Utilisation Branch of the Geological Survey of India ? If
so, what is the amount of money spent so far in the
working of this mine, and what is the average percentage of lead and zinc occurring in the
ores extracted from this mine ?
(b) Have Government any
information or lead deposits occurring in any
other part of India, and, if not, what fraction of India's lead requirements is likely to be met
from Jawar source alone ?
The
Honourable Dr. B. R.
Ambedkar: (a)
Yes. A sum of Rs.
6 1/2 lakhs has been spent upto the end of June 1943.
The average percentage found in exploration up to date is
2 percent lead and 8 per cent zinc.
(b)
Yes, the most likely occurrences known at present are at Chauth-ka-Barwara in Jaipur State.
107
[f.31]
Wolfram Deposits Discovered in a Bengal District
292. Mr. T. T. Krishnamachari (on behalf of Mr. R. R. Gupta) : Will
the Honourable the Labour Member
be pleased to state if it is a fact that some wolfram
deposits have been discovered by the Geological survey of
India in a Bengal District ?
If so, what is the quantity of wolfram so far won from this source, and how has it been disposed of?
The
Honourable Dr. B. R. Ambedkar :
Yes. During war-time it is not in the public interests to disclose the quantity of wolfram
won. The ore is disposed of through the Supply Department (Directorate-General, Munitions
Production).
108
[f.32]
Functions of the Labour Welfare Advisers and Labour Advisers
297.
Mr. Amarendra Nath Chattopadhyaya: (a) Will the Honourable the Labour Member
please state the functions of the Labour Welfare Advisers and Labour Advisers appointed in
the Labour Department ?
(b) How many such officers have been
appointed so far ?
The
Honourable Dr. B. R. Ambedkar
:
(a) The functions of the Labour Welfare Advisor and his Deputy and Assistants are to report to Government and advise
on all such matters relating to the welfare of industrial
Labour in India as Government may direct.
The
duties of the Labour Adviser were to advise on all important matters of Labour legislation and administration, and in particular the manner in which Labour problems that were under consideration or
might arise had been or were
being dealt with in England.
(b)
There is one Labour Welfare
Adviser, one Deputy Labour Welfare Adviser and 7 Assistant Labour Welfare
Officers.
One
Labour Adviser was appointed
from December 1942 to June 1943.
There
is at present no Labour Adviser.
Mr.
Amarendra
Nath Chattopadhyaya: Will they advise on dearness allowance ?
The
Honourable Dr. B. R. Ambedkar:
No. Sir.
Mr. T. T. Krishnamachari: Does the Labour Adviser, of the Honourable
Member, as distinct from
the Labour Welfare Adviser,
represent the employees' interests.
The
Honourable Dr. B. R. Ambedkar :
Not at all. Sir.
109
[f.33]Steps
for Eliminating Immediate Causes of Industrial Disputes
298. Mr. Amarendra Nath Chattopadhyaya: (a) Will the Honourable the Labour Member please state what effective steps for eliminating the immediate causes of industrial disputes to ensure the unhampered war production have been taken so far, both in the Government's own war-factories and in private factories engaged wholly or partly on war-orders ?
(b) Have Government decided to adopt an all round policy of having all disputes referred to the adjudication before workers are compelled to go
on a strike ?
(c) Do they propose to advise
all Provincial Governments to do so?
The
Honourable Dr. B. R. Ambedkar
:
(a) Government have attempted to secure fair conditions for Labour both in their own factories and in
private employment. Where disputes arise the methods of conciliation and adjudication are available.
(b)
and (c) No. The general
policy of Government is to
resort to adjudication if
and when the method of conciliation has
failed. The present machinery for the settlement or disputes has been evolved in consultation with Provincial Governments and general uniformity of practice has already been achieved.
110
[f.34]
Demolition of a Mosque on Ashoka
Road, New Delhi
Mr. President (The
Honourable Sir Abdul Rahim) :
I have received notice of motion of adjournment from Maulvi Abdul Ghani who wants to
discuss a definite matter of urgent public importance,
namely, the demolition of
a mosque in the premises of quarter No. 9, Asoka Road, by the Government Officers and men of the
Public Works Department. When did this take place ?
Maulvi
Muhammad Abdul Ghani
(Tirhut Division : Muhamma-dan) : It was done about ten days ago but I
got information about it only last night.
Mr.
President
(The Honourable Sir Abdul Rahim) : The Honourable Member is not the only person interested. If it is an urgent
public matter it is for every one to lake notice of it
immediately. Why was no
notice taken before ?
Sir
Muhammad Yamin Khan (Agra
Division: Muhammadan Rural)
: Sir, it did not come to
the notice of any Member of the House until yesterday, because it was done in one of the Government quarters.
Mr. President (The
Honourable Sir Abdul Rahim) :
Then how did the
Honourable Member come to know at all about it ?
Sir
Muhammad Yamin Khan :
Some passers-by came and informed some Members and made a complaint.
Mr.
President (The Honourable Sir Abdul Rahim) : Have Government anything to say about this
?
The
Honourable Dr. B. R. Ambedkar
(Labour Member): Sir, I
have had no notice of this
motion. Evidently my Honourable friend wrote a letter giving notice of this adjournment motion
to the Department of Education,
Health and Lands, which has been just now handed over to me.
Mr.
President (The Honourable Sir Abdul Rahim) : I want to know the facts.
The
Honourable Dr. B. R. Ambedkar : I have made inquiries from my Department and I am told that they do not know of any
such incident at all. As I said, I have not had sufficient time to
make inquiries in the matter, and I have no reason to suppose that
any such demolition has taken
place. However, if my Honourable friend
chooses to put a short notice question. I will make inquiries and let him have the information he wants.
Mr. President (The
Honourable Sir Abdul Rahim) : I think that will be the best course.
Mr.
H. A. Sathar H. Essak Sail (West Coast and Nilgiris: Muhammadan) : Then this motion can be held over.
Mr. President (The Honourable Sir Abdul Rahim) : If a short notice question is put I will consider it later.
Sir
Muhammad Yamin Khan: In any case
the short notice question cannot be put today and can
only be asked on Tuesday if the Assembly sits till then.
Mr. President (The
Honourable Sir Abdul Rahim) : Better
ask a short notice question.
[f.35]
Demolition of a Mosque on Asoka Road, New Delhi
Maulvi Muhammad Abdul Ghani: Will the Honourable the Labour Member be pleased to state :
(a)
Whether he is aware of the existence of a Mosque in
Asoka Road in Government Quarter No. 9 ;
(b) Whether the said Mosque has partly been demolished by Public Works Department men at the instance of a Public Works Department Official;
(c) Whether the demolition work was stopped due to the agitation by Muslims;
(d) What steps the Government
have taken to prevent such demolition and whether they have taken steps against the
person at fault ; if so, with what result ; and
(e) What steps Government are going to take to remedy
the harm done to the building ?
The
Honourable Dr. B. R. Ambedkar:
(a) Yesof an old, dilapidated and unused mosque.
(b)
No. One of the arches on the
northern wing of the mosque accidentally collapsed while felling a tree against
which it was leaning. The request for the removal of the tree came
from the present occupant
of the house-Major Anwar who complained that the
tree was obstructing the light.
(c)
No.
(d)
There was no demolition by the
Central Public Works Department, and so this question does
not arise.
(e)
It is an old dilapidated building, and no harm to it has, therefore, been caused.
Sir
Muhammad Yamin Khan :
When the tree was cut, why the precaution was not taken to see that the area which was leaning against the tree
might be kept in a safe condition ?
The
Honourable Dr. B. R. Ambedkar
: I have no reason to suppose that due
precaution was not taken against such an accident.
Sir
Muhammad Yamin Khan :
Even the efficient Engineers of the P. W.
D. could not protect one arch ?
Am I to take it with all due precaution, they were unable to protect one arch ?
The
Honourable Dr. B. R. Ambedkar:
Such an accident may happen notwithstanding the due care and attention.
Sir
Muhammad Yamin Khan: When the mosque exists in a quarter which is occupied by the Government and which was open to the public before the Government built their quarter, is
it not the duty of the Government to see that it is properly repaired
and kept in proper order?
The
Honourable Dr. B. R. Ambedkar :
I do not suppose there is any reason to believe that this mosque
was in actual use either before or after the quiuier was
built.
Maulana Zafar Ali Khan : Will Government give us an assurance that the
demolished portion of the mosque
will be restored by necessary repairs ?
The
Honourable Dr. B. R. Ambedkar : It
is quite unnecessary to do it because it was not used as a mosque nor is it a protected
monument.
Sir
Muhammad Yamin Khan : Will the
Honourable Member make a way for the public to get into this mosque ?
The
Honourable Dr. B. R. Ambedkar :
As I said, it is no longer in use as a mosque.
Sir
Muhammad Yamin Khan : May I know the reason why it is not
in use as a mosque ?
Mr. President (The Honourable Sir Abdul Rahim) : The Honourable Member is arguing.
Sir
Muhammad Yamin Khan: I want to know whether the Government
is going to make it accessible to the public so that it can be used as a mosque ?
The
Honourable Dr. B. R. Ambedkar :
It has never been in use as a mosque.
Maulana
Zafar Ali Khan
: Has the Government any objection if I carry out the repair at my expense ?
The
Honourable Dr. B. R. Ambedkar : The Honourable Member may
make an application and the Department will consider it.
Seth
Yusuf Abdoola Haroon :
Is it not a fact that the occupant of this quarter did object
to the cutting of the tree
?
The
Honourable Dr. B. R. Ambedkar :
The position is just the reverse. The tree was cut at the instance of the occupant of the
quarter.
Seth
Yusuf Abdoola Haroon :
Will the Honourable Member make a reference to the occupant of the quarter ?
The
Honourable Dr. B. R. Ambedkar :
I
have no reason to suppose that the information I have given is not correct.
Nawabzada Muhammad Liaquat Ali Khan : What reason has the Honourable Member to suppose that the information given by an Honourable Member of tills House is not correct ? Mr. President (The Honourable Sir Abdul Rahim)
: That is arguing.
The
Honourable Dr. B. R. Ambedkar : I have official
information. I don't know how reliable is the source of the Hon. Member's information.
112
[f.36]
The Indian Trade Unions (Amendment) Bill
The
Honourable Dr. B. R. Ambedkar
(Labour Member) : Sir, I beg to move for leave to introduce a Bill further to amend the Indian Trade Unions
Act, 1926.
Mr.
President (The Honourable Sir Abdul Rahim): The question is:
" That leave be granted to introduce a Bill further to amend the Indian Trade Unions Act,
1926 " The Motion was
adopted.
The
Honourable Dr. B. R. Ambedkar :
Sir, I introduce the Bill.
113
[f.37]Equalisation
of Rates of Allowance for Men and Women under the Indian
War Injuries Scheme
47.
Mr. N. M. Joshi : (a) Has the attention of the
Honourable the Labour
Member been drawn to the fact that the difference made between the rates of allowances paid to men and women under the War
Injuries Schemes in Great
Britain has been removed
some time back so that men and women receive allowances at the
same rates ?
(b)
If the reply to the above be in the affirmative, do the Government of India propose to
make a similar change in the Indian War Injuries schemes,
and to bring the rates of allowances paid to men and women on the same level ?
The
Honourable Dr. B. R.
Ambedkar: (a) Since notice
of this question was received, I have ascertained the position in Great Britain. It is a fact that the
distinction between rates
for relief for men and women has been abolished in Great Britain.
(b)
The question will be
considered.
114
[f.38]
Insertion in Government Contracts of Condition for Fair Treatment of Labour
48.
Mr. N. M. Joshi : Will the Honourable the Labour Member be pleased to stale whether the subject of the need for insertion in Government contracts
of a condition regarding fair treatment of
Labour was discussed at one
of the Tripartite Labour Meetings ? If so, what action do the
Government of India propose
to take on the subject ?
The
Honourable Dr. B. R. Ambedkar:
Yes, it was at the third
meeting of the Standing Labour Committee. To be precise the subject discussed
was need for insertion of a condition regarding
fair wages for Labour in Government
contracts, and not fair " treatment " of Labour. Government have already accepted the principle so far as the Central
Public Works Department is concerned and the necessary preliminary steps for enforcing such a provision are under
active consideration. The question or the
introduction of such a clause
in the contracts of other Government Departments will be taken up soon after the scheme has been introduced in respect of Central Public Works Department Labour.
Mr.
Hooseinbhoy A. Lalljee:
What is the meaning of " active consideration " ? Is there any lime limit involved ?
The
Honourable Dr. B. R. Ambedkar : Yes; I see quite clearly the difference between a matter being under consideration and under active consideration.
Mr.
Hooseinbhoy A. Lalljee : Is there any difference of time ?
The
Honourable Dr. B. R. Ambedkar : That means that the matter is really nearing completion.
115
[f.39]Rules
Concerning " Out of Class " Allottees in New Delhi
49. Maulvi Muhammad Abdul Ghani : (a) Will the Honourable
the Labour Member please state whether it is a fact that before
the introduction of the revised rules for allotment of residences
in New Delhi during the war, persons who were allotted quarters were allowed as a
concession to remain in occupation of those quarters after they became out of class, when no accommodation of the class to which they were entitled was
available ?
(b) If the answer to (a) is
in the affirmative, what
are the reasons for penalising the same occupants by the introduction of the proviso below rule 7 (2) (b) by relegating them to a junior position by treating the dates on which they became out of class as the
dates of their posting ?
(c) Is it not a fact that by the operation of the proviso referred
to in (b) above, the persons remain
longer in occupation of the lower
class of quarters and thus great hardship is caused to persons who are entitled to those quarters under revised rule 4 by compelling them
to wait longer than it would be necessary had the proviso not been in operation?
(d) Does the Honourable Member propose
to reconsider, and to
remove the grievances of
all concerned by deleting
the proviso below rule 7 (b) under lists II and III.
(e)
Does the Honourable Member realise that by the
introduction of the new policy viz, determination of seniority as regards the claim
for quarters by the total length of service, practically all new entrants to whatever class of quarters they were entitled will have to go without
quarters and be put to great
hardship ?
(f) With a view to redressing their grievance, does he propose to
consider the feasibility of amending the rule so as to allow the counting of seniority from the date of posting in the case of
new entrants who have not
been allotted any quarter
so far and in the case of
others from the date on which they became out of class ?
(g)
If the amendments suggested were accepted, will they be given immediate effect?
The
Honourable Dr. B. R. Ambedkar :
(a) Yes.
(b) The penalising
arises more from the shortage of accommodation than from
the proviso to rule 7(2)xx(b).
(c) Yes,
but this cannot be helped
under the existing circumstances.
(d) No. Nothing can remove the grievances unless
there is increased accommodation at the disposal of Government, which does not seem to be possible so long as the war lasts.
(e)I
do not consider that this is the case, but so long as the
accommodation available is short of requirements, whatever rules are made, some persons are bound to be put to hardship.
(e) This
is already provided for in
the rules.
(g)
Does not arise.
116
[f.40]Supply
of Foodgrains to Employees of the Labour Department in
Bengal at Concession Rates
5.
Mr. K. C. Neogy : (a) Will the Honourable Member for Labour be pleased
to state the different classes of employees under
the control of his Department and employed in Bengal that are in the enjoyment of a concession under which foodgrains
are supplied to them at controlled or reduced prices ?
(b) What is the total number of such employees and what quantities of rice, wheat and
other foodgrains have been supplied to them at
controlled or reduced
prices, month by month, since January last ?
(c)
Who are charged in Bengal
with the duty of furnishing
supplies for the benefit
of these employees and
what is the approximate extent of the stocks that they had to maintain from time to time to enable them to discharge their obligation, and through
what agencies in Bengal have these
stocks been acquired, and
at what prices on an average, month by month ?
The Honourable Dr. B. R. Ambedkar:
The attention of the Honourable
Member is invited to reply given by the Honourable the Food Member to starred question No. 55 on the 9th November 1943.
117
[f.41]Certain
Irregularities in the Working of the Payment of Wages Act
130.
Mr. Laldiand Navalrai : (a) Will the Honourable
Member for Labour be pleased
to slate the number of irregularities detected by the Conciliation Officer (Railways) and Supervisor of
Railway Labour, during the years
1939-40 and 1940-41, in the working of the Payment of Wages Act ? If there is an increase during the latter year, what steps do Government propose to take besides reporting to Railway
administrations concerned to remedy this ? If none, why ?
(b) Will the Honourable Member please
give a reference to the specific provision of the
Payment of Wages Act, or rules
framed thereunder,
sanctioning the course of reporting irregularities to Railway
administration instead of the
authorities set up under Section 15 of the Act ?
(c) If there is no such provision, why
is not action taken under Section 15(3) of the
Payment of Wages Act by Labour Inspectors ?
The
Honourable Dr. B. R. Ambedkar :
(a) The number of irregularities detected during 1939-40
and 1940-41 were 3,012 and
4,158, respectively, Railway Administrations have recently been directed to lake suitable stops to
obviate the recurrence of these irregularities. If the
irregularities continue to increase, the question of making formal
applications under Section 15 of the Act will be
considered. Government does not consider it necessary to proceed formality under the provisions of
that Section when satisfactory settlement in the individual cases can be otherwise achieved.
(b)
There is no such provision in the Payment of Wages Act or the
rules framed thereunder.
(c)
The provisions of Section 15(3) are not mandatory and there
is nothing in the Act to prevent
an Inspector from making
reports to Railway Administration and getting any claims settled amicably.
Mr. Lalchand Navalrai : Have these Inspectors enough power to make recommendations
?
The
Honourable Dr. B. R. Ambedkar :
Yes.
Mr.
N. M. Joshi : May I ask if these irregularities are found on
the Company-managed railways or even on the State-managed railways ?
The
Honourable Dr. B. R. Ambedkar: I must have notice of that
question.
118
[f.42]
Activities of the Conciliation Officer (Railways)
131.
Mr. Lalchand Navalrai : (a) Will the Honourable Member for Labour be pleased to refer to his reply to Mr. N. M. Joshi in regard to starred question No. 147 asked by
me on the 19th February,
1943, stating that he would consider extending the field of activities of the Conciliation Officer
(Railways), and state whether
any action has been taken
in the matter ? If so, is it proposed to make a brief statement on the subject?
The
Honourable Dr. B. R. Ambedkar :
The question is still under consideration and I am not
at present in a position
to make any statement.
Mr. Lalchand Navalrai :
What is delaying the consideration
so much?
The Honourable Dr. B. R. Ambedkar :
I
said that the matter is under consideration.
Mr.
Lalchand
Navalrai : Why is it taking so long ?
The
Honourable Dr. B. R. Ambedkar : I
do not think it has taken a long time.
Mr.
Hooseinbhoy A. Lalljee : When will it reach
the stage of active consideration?
The
Honourable Dr. B. R. Ambedkar : The stage of consideration is
now complete.
Mr. Govind V. Deshmukh : Since when has the matter been under consideration ?
The
Honourable Dr. B. R. Ambedkar: For a long
time and particularly since the time when Mr. Joshi asked his question.
119
[f.43]Institution
of Engineers
136.
Mr. Ananga Mohan Dam : Will the Honourable the Labour Member
be pleased to state :
(a)
whether the Institution of Engineers is an examining body
whose diploma of A.M.I.E. is recognised by the Government of India as being equivalent to degree standard in Engineering;
(b) whether the Government (Central or Provincial)
financially help this Institution ; if so, the amount of
aid granted ;
(c) whether it is not a fact that the Institution
has for its patrons and Honourary Members, Their Excellencies the Viceroy and the Provincial Governors;
(d) whether Government are aware that this Institution has obtained the Royal
Charter;
(e) whether it is a fact that
sister Institutions in England, e.g., the Institute of Mechanical
Engineers, the Institute of Civil Engineers, the Institute
of Electrical Engineers,
have not yet recognised the examinations conducted by
the Institute of Engineers, India
; and
(f) if
the Government of India propose to move His Majesty's
Government to request these British institutions to accord
recognition to this Indian Institution ? The Honourable Dr. B. R. Ambedkar: (a) Yes.
(b) The
Central Government do not
render any financial help
to the Institution, but I have no information whether Provincial Governments do so or not.
(c) His
Excellency the Viceroy and
provincial Governors are Honorary Members of the Institution.
(d)
Yes.
(e)
Government have no information.
(f)
It is for the Indian institution itself to raise the question, if necessary. I would, therefore, suggest to my
Honourable friend that he addresses that Institution in
the matter.
1.. A. DEBATES (CENTRAL) QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS
120
[f.44]
Constructing a Large Hotel for Indian Clerks in New Delhi
[f.45]145.
Sardar Sant Singh : {a) Will the Honourable the Labour Member please state whether Government have considered the
advisability of constructing a large several storeyed building in New
Delhi in the form of a big hotel in order to provide lodging and boarding facilities for Indian clerks who are otherwise put to considerable difficulties in obtaining these at present
?
(b) Is it a fact that many buildings
have been constructed for the accommodation of European single non-commissioned Officers,
etc., and that these are being run as hostels ?
(c) Are Government prepared
to provide similar facilities for the Indian single clerks ? If not, why not ?
The
Honourable Dr. B. R. Ambedkar:
(a) Government are considering
the possibility of erecting a hostel for clerks.
(b)
Yes.
(c)
Government have already provided chummries of Orthodox and Un-orthodox
types for Indian single clerks and they are considering whether there will be an adequate demand to justify the erection of a hostel.
121
[f.46]Delay
in Attending to the Complaints Made to Minto Road and Havetock Square Enquiry Offices, New Delhi
[f.47]147.
Sardar Sant Singh : (a)
Will the Honourable the Labour Member please state whether
Government are aware that
complaints made to the Enquiry Offices at Minto Road and
Havetock Square regarding repairs, etc., to orthodox clerks quarters in those
neighbourhoods are attended to generally after considerable delay ?
(i) that some of these complaints are not attended to at all ; and (ii) that letters sent on the subject to the Executive Engineer, Construction III
Division, or to other
authorities in ' B ' Division, remain unacknowledged and without any action being taken on them?
(c) Are
Government prepared to issue
instructions to the authorities concerned to acknowledge all letters sent to them, and to take appropriate action thereon ? If not, why not ?
(i)
that a tot of inconvenience is being caused to their tenants by the irregular rnethod adopted by the contractors regarding whitewashing, etc.;
(ii)
that they send men round
to the quarters and the tenants are asked
to keep their rooms clear
of furniture on a certain
day, and then white-washing Labour is not sent for several days later; and
(iii) that when while-washing
is finished the cleaning of doors and glass panes is not
done at once, and the tenants are unable to arrange their houses for several days ?
(e) Are Government prepared to take action to redress these grievances of their tenants ? If not, why not ?
The
Honourable Dr. B. R. Ambedkar
:
(a) No.
(b)
(i) No.
(ii)
Action on letters received by Executive Engineers is taken at
once and necessity is not
felt of acknowledging all letters.
(c) Yes.
(d)
(i), (ii) and (iii) No.
(e)
Yes, Government intend
issuing instructions to Executive Engineers to make frequent personal inspections.
122
[f.48]Newly-Constructed E-Type Orthodox Quarters in
the Open Space Between Baird Square East and Irwin Road in New Delhi
[f.49]148.
Sardar Sant Singh: (a) Is the Honourable
the Labour Member aware that a number of E-Type orthodox quarters have been constructed in the open space lying between Baird Square, East and Irwin
Road in New Delhi ? (b) Is
he aware
(i) that this area now looks
very much like a congested portion of the city
containing small gallies and lanes; and
(ii) that the present
officials of the Central
Public Works Department
have totally ignored the
original idea of the
layout of New Delhi, and
have made the said area very congested ?
(c) Is it a fact that it is
proposed to construct more E-type
orthodox quarters ?
(d) Are Government prepared to consider the advisability of
constructing new quarters in such a manner that the " Clerks' residential areas " do not become more congested than they are at present, and that provision is
made for lawns and open
spaces near these quarters ?
The
Honourable Dr. B. R. Ambedkar:
(a) Yes.
(b)
(i) and (ii) No.
(c) Yes.
(d)
Government have always acted in this manner.
123
[f.50]Desirability of Closing Certain Passages in Havetock anil Baird Squares New Delhi
[f.51]149.
Sardar Sant Singh : (a) Will the
Honourable the Labour Member please state whether it is a fact that all the squares of D-type orthodox clerks
quarters in the D.I.Z. Area of New Delhi had
their four corners open as
passage ?
(b)
Is it a fact that these passages were closed later ?
(c)
Was one of the reasons to
protect the lawns in front
of the quarters in those
squares ?
(d)
Are Government aware
(i)
that in Havelock and Baird
Squares, B and C-type of quarters, there are
passages after every two quarters except at the comers ; and
(ii)
that coolies and Labourers
use these passages regularly,
and cross the lawns at
different places with the result that the lawns in these two
squares are disfigured by
foot tracks ?
(e) Are Government prepared to have these passages
closed and grass relaid on these tracks ? If not, why not ?
The
Honourable Dr. B. R. Ambedkar:
(a) and (b) Yes.
(d) Yes.
(e)
Government will examine the suggestion.
124
[f.52]Growing
of More Vegetables in Orthodox Quarters in New Delhi
[f.53]150.
Sardar Sant Singh: (a) With reference to the general appeal of Government to grow more food and vegetables, will the Honourable Member for Labour please state whether the Government of India staff
living in New Delhi at orthodox type of quarters can grow vegetables in large quantities ?
(b) Is it a fact that the courtyards of D-type particularly, and of E, C and B-type
orthodox quarters generally,
are very small in size, and cannot be used to produce any large
quantity of vegetables, etc. ?
(c)
Are Government prepared to
allot some extra land outside
their quarters to such members of their orthodox staff who may ask for it for the purpose of growing vegetables, etc., and to have such land
duly enclosed ? If not,
why not ?
The
Honourable Dr. B. R. Ambedkar:
(a) Vegetables may be grown in small quantities
for the domestic
consumption of the staff occupying these quarters.
(b) Yes.
(c)
No. The proposal if accepted would soon result in
destruction of lawns. Fencing is expensive and cannot be provided by Government, and it is unlikely that
the staff living in these quarters will be able to
make adequate use of such extra land.
125
[f.54]
Commissioned Officers in Civil Pioneer Force, United Provinces
29.
Mr. Piare Lall Kureel: Will the
Honourable Member for
Labour be pleased to state :
(a)
the total number of
commissioned officers (different ranks) so far recruited
in the Civil Pioneer Force, United Provinces ;
(b) how many of them are Hindus, Muslims and members of the Scheduled Castes;
(c) how many of these commissioned officers have been promoted to higher ranks ;
(d) if any scheduled caste commissioned officer has so far been promoted to the higher
rank ; and
(e)
if the answer to (d) be in the negative, if Government propose to make such
promotion now ?
The
Honourable Dr. B. R. Ambedkar:
(a) and (b) Twenty-five officers
of commissioned rank have
been appointed. The ranks and communities of the officers
are
|
Muslims |
Scheduled
Castes |
Others |
Commandants |
|
|
2
One Christian |
Captains |
|
|
2
One Christian |
Lieutenants |
|
|
7
Two Christian |
2nd
Lieutenants |
4 |
3 |
7 |
(c)Two
Commandants and two Captains were appointed in those ranks on first commission. Seven 2nd
Lieutenants have been promoted to the posts of Lieutenants.
(d)
No.
(e)
Promotion to higher rank can only be made within the authorised establishment of those
ranks as vacancies become available. Subject to the authority of the Central Government,
the power to make promotions is entrusted to the provincial Government. Except to prevent
positive injustice it is not considered desirable to interfere with the discretion of the
Provincial Government in this matter, particularly as regards the higher posts. Promotions
are regulated by two considerations (1) Efficiency and (2) Seniority. Since efficiency of
the Unit must depend on the efficiency of its officers, efficiency must be the basis of
promotion. But in case where efficiency is equal, seniority of service in the Force is
also taken into account in making promotions.
126
[f.55]
Counting of Services of Commissioned Officers in Civil Pioneer Force as War Services
30.
Mr. Piare Lall Kureel: Will the Honourable Member for Labour be pleased to state :
(a)
whether the services of the commissioned officers in the Civil Pioneer Force will be
counted as war services ; if not, why not ; and
(b)
if the answer to (a) above be in the negative, if Government propose to revise their
decision ?
The
Honourable Dr. B. R. Ambedkar :
(a) Yes.
(b)
Does not arise.
127
[f.56]Beveridge
Report for Post War Social Security
229. Khan Bahadur Mian Ghulam Kadir Muhammad Shahban:
Will the Honourable the Labour Member be pleased to state:
(a)
whether Government have considered the Beveridge Report for post-war social security ;
(b)
whether they have any social security plan in view for India after the cessation of
hostilities;
(c)
whether, if the matter has not yet engaged their attention, they will take it up now with
a view to evolving a plan similar to what is known as " Beveridge Plan " for
this country ; and
(d) on what lines, if any, the Post-War
Reconstruction Committee is working ?
The
Honourable Dr. B. R. Ambedkar:
(a) It is not for the Government of India to consider the Beveridge Report submitted to
the Government in the United Kingdom. The Government of India are, however, aware of the
Report.
(b)
and (c). I would invite the attention of the Honourable Member to the resolution on this
subject passed at the last meeting in September, 1943,. of the Tripartite Labour
Conference. Copies of the resolution are placed on the table of the house. The Government
of India is giving active consideration to the question of implementing the resolution.
(d)
I would invite the Honourable Member's attention to the statement laid on the table of the
Council of State on the 4th August, 1943, by the Honourable Sir Jwala Prasad Srivastava in
reply to question No. 74 by the Honourable Pandit H. N. Kunazru.
Resolution
passed at the Tripartite Plenary Labour Conference held at New Delhi on the 6th and 7th
September, 1943.
This
Tripartite Labour Conference recommends that with a view to provide adequate materials on
which to plan a policy of social security for Labour the Central Government in
co-operation with the Governments of the Provinces of British India, the Indian States and
the Chamber of Princes should immediately set up machinery to investigate questions of
wages and earnings, employment and housing and social conditions generally, and that as
soon as possible after receipt of the required statistics and data the Central Government
should appoint a mixed Committee to formulate plans of social security.
128
[f.57]Neglect
of Lawns in Front of Orthodox Clerks' Quarters in D.I.Z. Area, New Delhi
232.
Sardar Sant Singh: (a) Will the Honourable the Labour Member please state whether it is a
fact that the lawns in front of orthodox clerks' quarters in the D.I.Z. area of New Delhi
are not properly maintained ?
(b)
Is it a fact that most of the ground is covered with dried up stunted grass ?
(c)
Is it a fact that the roads bordering these lawns have almost in all cases lost their
alignment, and that some portions of the road are covered with grass, while in other cases
the grass has completely disappeared and is covered by bajri and soil?
(d)
Is it a fact that there are malis regularly employed by the Horticultural Division to look
after these lawns ?
(e)
Is the Honourable Member aware that these malis water the lawns only once or twice a month
and do not pay any attention to anything else ?
(f)
Are Government prepared to take action to sec that these lawns are properly maintained ?
The
Honourable Dr. B. R. Ambedkar:
(a) No.
(b)
No.
(c)
No.
(d)
Yes.
(e)
The malis not only water the lawns but also keep them in proper order.
(f)
The question does not arise, but Government will be prepared to enquire into any bonafide
complaints on this subject.
Sardar
Sant Singh : Has the Honourable Member simply given the reply on the note prepared by the
Department or has he taken pains to see the conditions of these quarters to satisfy
himself whether the allegations made in the question are correct or not ?
The
Honourable Dr. B. R. Ambedkar : I
have no reason to suppose that the information supplied to me is not correct.
129
[f.58]
Operation of the Payment of Wages Act on East
Indian Railway
236.
Nawab Siddique Ali Khan (on behalf of Qazi Muhammad Ahmad Kazmi): Will the Honourable the
Labour Member be pleased to state:
(a)
the number of cases of contravention of the Payment of Wages Act (Act IV of 1936),
detected on the East Indian Railway during each of the years 1941, 1942 and upto the 15th
October, 1943 ;
(b)
the number of applications made to the authority appointed under section 15(1) of the
Payment of Wages Act by the Inspectors for offences committed by the East Indian Railway
authorities since the Act was brought into force in 1937; and
(c)
the number of cases in which penalties were imposed under section 20 against the East
Indian Railway Officers ?
The
Honourable Dr. B. R. Ambedkar :
(a) The number of cases of contraventions of the Payment of Wages Act on the East Indian
Railway were 334 during 1941-42, 481 during 1942-43 and 123 from 1st April to 15th October
1943.
(b)
Nil.
(c)
Nil.
130
[f.59]Operation
of the Payment of Wages Act on East Indian Railway
237.
Nawab Siddique Ali Khan (on behalf of Qazi Muhammad Ahmad Kazmi) : (a) Will the Honourable
the Labour Member please state if it is or it is not a fact that the Inspectors of Railway
Labour have to obtain prior sanction from the Supervisor of Railway Labour for any action
they may intend to take against offenders under the Payment of Wages Act ?
(b)
If the reply to (a) above be in the affirmative, what is the number of instances when such
permission was sought and sanction accorded relating to cases of contravention of the
Payment of Wages Act on the East Indian Railway year by year from 1937 ?
The
Honourable Dr. B. R. Ambedkar :
(a) It is only the Supervisor of Railway Labour and his Deputy who have been appointed
Inspectors under Section 14 of the Payment of Wages Act, 1936, any formal action under the
Act has therefore necessarily to be taken by these two officers and the question of taking
their prior sanction does not arise.
(b)
In view of the reply to part (a), this does not arise.
131
[f.60]
Operation of the Payment of Wages Act on East Indian Railway
238.
Nawab Siddique Ali Khan (on behalf of Qazi Muhammad Ahmad Kazmi) : (a) Will the Honourable
the Labour Member please state if it is or it is not a fact that lack of effective and
proper supervision of the conduct of the Payment of wages Act is responsible for such
frequent contravention of the Payment of Wages Act on the East Indian Railway ?
(b)
Do Government propose to consider the advisability of making changes in the existing
machinery with a view to affording proper and effective check on such contraventions of
the Payment of wages Act by the Railway officers ?
The
Honourable Dr. B. R. Ambedkar :
(a) What the Honourable Member suggests is not a fact. The very fact that such a large
number of irregularities are brought to light every year and rectified at the instance of
the Supervisor of Railway Labour proves the effectiveness of the Machinery which now
exists for this purpose.
(b)
Does not arise.
132
[f.61]
Representation from Mr. V. G. Balwaik re War
Bonus to Workers
239.
Mr. Govind V. Deshmukh : Will the Honourable
Member for Labour please state:
(a)
if he has received a representation from Mr. V. G. Balwaik, President, Central Provinces
and Berar Provincial Workers' Federation, Nagpur, in the month of October, 1943, in
connection with war bonus to workers;
(b)
if Government have arrived at any decision regarding the condition attached to the
additional war bonus by the Empress and Model mills, viz., the Government of India to
decide whether more than two months' wages as war bonus can be treated as expenditure on
which the company will have to pay no tax ; if so, what their decision is; and
(c)
if he is aware of the decision of the Working Committee of the Central Provinces and Berar
Textile Workers' Federation to go on strike from the 15th November, 1943, if the
mill-owners in the Province will not pay this additional or second instalment of the war
bonus by the 14th November 1943 ?
The
Honourable Dr.B. R. Ambedkar:
(a) No.
(b)
No. The general question of limitation of bonuses admissible as revenue expenditure is
under consideration and it will not be expedient to give further details at the present
stage.
(c)
Yes.
Mr. Govind V.
Deshimikh : May I know the reasons why it would not be possible to arrive at a
conclusion at an earlier date and give details ?
The
Honourable Dr. B. R. Ambedkar :
We are doing our best to arrive at a conclusion as early as possible.
Mr. Govind V. Deshmukh: What time it will take,
because the withdrawal of the strike has been made under my instructions that the
Government of India will decide this question and the strike had better be postponed ?
The
Honourable Dr. B. R. Ambedkar :
I am unable to give any detail.
Mr.
N. M. Joshi : May I ask whether the Government of India is aware that there is very great
discontent among the textile workers of Central Provinces on account of the fact that the
Government of India have not decided this question early ?
The
Honourable Dr. B. R. Ambedkar : I have no information on the point.
133
[f.62]Students
Admitted to Dhanbad School of Mines
242.
Maulvi Muhammad Abdul Ghani : Will the Honourable the Labour Member please state :
(a) the
number of students admitted to the Dhanbad School of Mines, and the number of Muslims
therein during 1941, 1942 and 943;
(b) whether any quota is fixed for the admission of
Muslims ; and
(c) the total number of Muslims who applied for
admission during the last three years ?
The
Honourable Dr. B. R. Ambedkar:
(a) 24 students were admitted during each of the years 1941, 1942 and 1943. No Muslim
student was admitted in 1941 and 1942. In 1943 two were admitted but one did not join the
School.
(b) No
; and
(c)
34.
Dr, Sir Zia Uddin Ahmad: What is the reason for
the non-admission of Muslim students ?
The
Honourable Dr. B. R. Ambedkar
: That is because they do not qualify themselves at the entrance examination,
Dr.
Sir Zia Uddin Ahmad ; As for academic qualifications I can prove that there are any number
of Muslims who are fit to join that institution. But is it not a fact that scholarships
are not given to Muslims ?
The
Honourable Dr. B. R. Ambedkar ; I cannot say ; I shall want notice of that.
Maulvi
Muhammad Abdul Ghani; Is it a fact that last year qualified Muslims applied but they were
rejected outright?
The
Honourable Dr, B. R. Ambedkar : No. If I may explain to the Honourable member, the method
of admission to the school is that first of all 50 per cent. of the places are filled as a
result of an entrance examination which is open to all students. After that a certain
quota is filled for the purpose of representing each province according to a quota that
has been fixed. After that the balance of students is taken purely on the basis of merit.
At this school there is no reservation with regard to any particular community at all.
[f.1]Legislative
Assembly Debates (Central), Vol. II of 1943, 2nd April 1943, p. 1735.
[f.2]Legislative
Assembly Debates (Central), Vol. III of 1943, 26th July 1943, pp. 42-43.
[f.3]
Legislative Assembly Debates (Central), Vol. III of 1943, 26th July 1943, p. 43.
[f.4]
lbid., p. 43.
[f.5]lbid., p. 43.
[f.6]Legislative
Assembly Debates (Central), Vol. III of 1943, 28th July 1943, p. 129.
[f.7]Legislative
Assembly Debates (Central). Vol. III of 1943, 28th July 1943, p. 130.
[f.8]lbid.,pp.
134-35.
[f.9]
Legislative Assembly Debates (Central), Vol. III of 1943, 28th July 1943, p. 139.
[f.10]
Legislative Assembly Debates (Central), Vol. III of 1943, 28th July 1943. p. 139.
[f.11]
lbid., 2nd August 1943, p. 268.
[f.12]
Legislative Assembly Debates (Central), Vol. III of 1943, 2nd August 1943, p. 271.
[f.13]Legislative
Assembly Debates (Central), Vol.III of 1943, 2nd August 1943, pp. 273-74.
[f.14]Legislative
Assembly Debates (Central), Vol. III of 1943, 2nd August 1943, p. 282.
[f.15]
Legislative Assembly Debates (Central), Vol. 11 of 1943, 2nd August 1943, p. 285.
[f.16]Answer
to this question laid on the table, the questioner being absent.
[f.17]Legislative
Assembly Debates (Central), Vol. III 1943, 2nd August 1943, p. 286.
[f.18]
Legislative Assembly Debates (Central), Vol. III of 1943, 2nd August 1943, p. 287.
[f.19]
Legislative Assembly Debates (Central), Vol. III of 1943, 2nd August 1943, p. 292.
[f.20]
Not included in these Debates, but a copy has been
placed in the Library of the House.Ed. of D.
[f.21]
Legislative Assembly Debates (Central), Vol. III of 1943, 5th August 1943, p. 426.
[f.22]
Legislative Assembly Debates (Central), Vol. III of 1943, 5th August 1943, p. 426.
[f.23]
Answer to this question laid on the table, the questioner having exhausted his quota.
[f.24]Legislative
Assembly Debates (Central), Vol. III of 1943, 2nd August 1943, pp. 426-27.
[f.25]
Answer to this question laid on the table, the questioner having exhausted his quota.
[f.26]
Legislative Assembly Debates (Central), Vol. III of 1943, 5th August 1943, p. 434.
[f.27]
Ibid., 12th August 1943, p. 642.
[f.28]
Legislative Assembly Debates (Central), Vol. III of 1943, 12th August 1943, p. 654.
[f.29]Legislative
Assembly Debates (Central), Vol.III of 1943, 12th August 1943, pp. 654-55.
[f.30]
Legislative Assembly Debates (Central), Vol. III of 1943, 12th August 1943, p. 655.
[f.31]
Ibid., p. 655.
[f.32]
Legislative Assembly Debates (Central), Vol. III of 1943. 12th August 1943, p. 657.
[f.33]
lbid., pp. 657-58.
[f.34]Legislative
Assembly Debates (Central), Vol. III of 1943, 21st August 1943, p. 897.
[f.35]
Legislative Assembly Debates (Central), Vol. III of 1943, 25th August 1943, p. 980.
[f.36]
Legislative Assembly Debates (Central), Vol. IV of 1943, 8th November 1943, p. 30.
[f.37]
Ibid.. 9th November 1943, p. 68.
[f.38]
Legislative Assembly Debates (Central), Vol. IV of 1943, 9th November 1943, p. 68.
[f.39]
Legislative Assembly Debates (Central), Vol. IV of 1943, 9th November 1943, pp. 68- 69.
[f.40]
Legislative Assembly Debates (Central), Vol. IV of 1943, 9th November 1943, p. 81.
[f.41]
Legislative Assembly Debates (Central), Vol. IV of 1943, 13th November 1943, pp. 230-31.
[f.42]Legislative
Assembly Debates(Central), Vol. IV of 1943, 13th November 1943, p. 231.
[f.43]Legislative
Assembly Debates (Central), Vol. IV of 1943, 13th November 1943, pp. 233-34.
[f.44]Legislative
Assembly Debates (Central), Vol. IV of 1943, 13th November 1943, pp. 242-43.
[f.45]
Answer to this question laid on the table, the questioner being absent.
[f.46]
Ibid.. pp. 243-44.
[f.47]
Answer to this question laid on the table, the questioner being absent.
[f.48]
Legislative Assembly Debates (Central), Vol. IV of 1943, 13th November 1943, p. 244.
[f.49] Answer
to this question laid on the table, the questioner being absent.
[f.50]Legislative
Assembly Debates (Central), Vol. IV of 1943, 13th November 1943, pp. 244-45.
[f.51]
Answer to this question laid on the table, the questioner being absent.
[f.52]
Legislative Assembly Debates (Central), Vol. IV of 1943, l3th November 1943, p. 245.
[f.53]
Answer to this question laid on the table, the questioner being absent.
[f.54]
Legislative Assembly Debates (Central), Vol. IV of 1943, 13th November 1943, pp. 24849.
[f.55]
Legislative Assembly Debates (Central), Vol. IV of 1943, 13th November 1943, p. 249.
[f.56]
lbid.,
17th November 1943, pp. 410-11.
[f.57]Legislative
Assembly Debates (Central), Vol. IV of 1943, 17th November 1943, p. 412.
[f.58]
Legislative Assembly Debates (Central), Vol. IV of 1943, l7th November 1943, p. 414.
[f.59]Legislative
Assembly Debates (Central), Vol. IV of 1943, 17th November 1943, p. 414.
[f.60]
Legislative Assembly Debates (Central), Vol. IV of 1943, 17th November 1943, pp. 414-15.
[f.61]
Ibid., p. 415.
[f.62]
Legislative Assembly Debates (Central), Vol. IV of 1943, 17th November 1943, p. 416.