 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
Speaking on the subject Prof. Jemini Kadu said that brahminism is still existing in a democratic country like India. In my book I had written that brahmins always try to retain their supremacy with the help of policy of robbing and false propagating, quarrelling and policy of splitting. On the basis of religion and in the name of reward, brahmins robbed us. With time, the corruption system has changed and Brahminism itself is corruption and criminalisation. The indigenous should not oppose to the supremacy of arya brahmins, for that they had tried their level best to restrict our entry in each and every field and also in education. Education is the platform where we acquire knowledge hence they restricted us. It was Rashtrapita Phuley (OBC) who revolted against this system and open the doors of education to the indigenous people.
India is a democratic country and through elections we are sending MPs to the parliament. But why we are not able to elect the bahujan representatives still after 53 years of independence. The reason is that we are not able to identify right representatives so that we can send them to parliament.
If we look into the election procedures and programs, we will notice that to win the election, arya brahmins had taken the support of crime and corruption. Almost 20 crimes charges are there on many of the BJP MPs but nothing is happening.
To impose supremacy on common man, brahmins usually spread fear in the society. Because they want to win the elections at any cost.
If elections are to be won, then money plays an important role. From where this money comes? Because the candidates don’t spend any money from their own pocket. This money comes from corruption through bofors and tahalka etc. After tahalka issue, congress intervened and stop the parliamentary session for seven days. After that there was some meeting between Sonia Gandhi and Atal Bihari who make out some common minimum program for implementation. But this was only an political adjacement.
To keep brahminism alive, today they are compelled to do force full agitations. There are two type of reactions on common man against this agitation’s. The first one is that he starts following the same path and secondly fear is created in the society. To create fear, brahmins took support of corruption and criminal persons. Due to the criminal persons society gets feared and vote as per their directions.
He further said that the bofors issue during the congress period and the tahalka issue during the BJP period both are related to defence area. Harshad Mehta had done corruption of thousand crore rupees. There was also corruption in communication department. But it was not in the news, but tahalka issue was made a hot issue why? Because defence area is directly linked to the common man and to utilise their mentality it was highlited.
Preamble of our constitution speaks of making a society based on liberty, fraternity, equality and justice. If for time being we assume that such type of society is created, then what will happen? There will be no differential power in this country. If we had accepted the democratic system then why dharma sansad is prevailing in the society and what is its necessity at all? In this democratic country any one can speak against democracy. Why is it so? Because through constitution an system based on equality can be created hence arya brahmins are opposing our every move.
|
| |
|
|
 |
|
 |
| |