 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
Concluding special debate session No. 2 Mr. Waman Meshram said that normally people say that “We are against brahminism but not against brahmin”. This is not false if looked as principle, but is brahminism created by non-brahmin? Simple answer to this is that brahminism is created by none other than brahmins. Bahujans haven’t created brahminism but Bahujan mind are fully occupied with brahminism.
When brahmin is acting on brahminism, he is deliberately acting on it, but bahujan are acting indirectly on brahminism. Brahmin is the originator of brahminism. He is not only originator but protector of brahminism. Brahmins can give their lives for protecting brahminism, also for protecting it they can even take lives of others. For example the killing from Chakradhar to saint Tukaram and Gyaneshwar was done to protect brahminism. This means that brahmins deliberately act as per brahminism. Hence their can not be any change in brahmins but bahujans who are acting indirectly on brahminism, there minds can be changed.
In 1927 Dr. Ambedkar himself said that I am against brahminism and not against brahmin. But 1936 in the book of “Annihilation of caste” Dr. Ambedkar said that, the progressive brahmins and regressive brahmins are the two hands of body and further he said that in the last two thousand years brahmins can’t produce a single Voltaire. Voltaire was the same person who stood against the church, who had taken the responsibility of him, as he was without mother and father. Voltaire was able to agitate against church because he was faithful intelligent. He analysed that church is a place where wrong things propagates, hence he stood against those wrong things. Babasaheb Ambedkar had put a question before us. Is really such type of faithful intellegencia available with brahmins who can do revolt against brahaminism ? Dr. Ambedkar had said that brahmins today are worshipping Gautam Buddha, who was propagator of non-violence and peace also the same brahmin is worshiping kali mata, who was everyday killing somebody. He also worship Parshuram who had killed kshatriyas 21 times. Brahmin also worship Ram, who was kshatriya. If this all is true then who will rely that brahmins are faithful. As brahmins are deliberately acting like this no change can be made in them. Dr. Ambedkar further says that those who are collaborating the societies without any change in their ideology, they will end up with frustation and failure.
Whenever brahmin becomes Gandhian or Communist or a BJP man or a R.S.S. cadre or a congressian, he never change his objective though he updates the strategies as per the need of time. Hence samajwadi brahmins, communist Bbrahmins, Gandhian brahmins sanatani brahmins, sacred thread wearing brahmins, progressive and regressive brahmins, all brahmins are same. Their objective is same, though they are at different places with different names. For example the communist, samajwadi, congress and BJP, four types of brahmins are present in the parliament. All the four brahmins support the women reservation bill, but the same brahmin stand against OBC women’s reservation in the same bill. This means that out of 545 seats 181 will be reserved for their half hair cut high caste ladies, if there is no OBC reservation. Now the question arises, BJP people against congress, congress people against BJP and Communist against both BJP and Congress and Samajwadi’s against both, but still all are supporting the women’s bill but opposing OBC reservation in it. This proves that arya brahmins change their strategies but don’t change their objective, wherever they are. Our question is that why Tahalka, Bofors, Harshad Mehta share scam happens in India? To understand this one must know that India is a democratic country and in democracy majority rules. But in India, those (arya Brahmins) who are in minority are rulling the country. Why this happens so? Today the minority people are facing problems as people like Nehru who propagated the theory of dedication and sacrifice are not with them. Also elections can be fought on the basis of independence movement. Hence the main problem before brahmins is how to achieve the votes? They had utilised the brahmin-baniya press media to the fullest extent to make majority in favour of them. The press media propagates the false issues with greater attention. For example Indira Gandhi’s “Garibi Hatav Slogan” (Removal of Poverty). Today the poverty has not removed but Indian govt. had created another line “Kuposhan line”(famine) below poverty line. Most of wheat is exported through India but Indian people are starving. The poverty removal slogan converted the minority votes into majority votes and brahmins got the power. The press media help the rulling castes every time. Not only this but for getting majority votes the arya brahmins had also taken the help of crime. They supported some criminals for the same. Later those criminals came to know that due to us those pandits are electing, then why to elect them, we ourselves will fill the forms and will get elect. As soon as these persons started entering the parliament, the brahmin-baniya press of India started propagating that the politics had been changed into criminalisation. When brahmins were utilising these criminals, it was not criminalisation.
Brahmins are in minority and there population can’t be increased into majority. So the only way left with them is to fool the majority people and utilise their strength in favour of them. When with the help of criminals arya brahmins were not succeeding much, so they are now taking the help of money now. So money and mafia are the tools of arya brahmins of winning elections. Hence we must be cautions against every strategy of brahmins.
|
| |
|
|
 |
|
 |
| |